The WW-HECT protein Smurf2 interacts with the Docking Protein NEDD9/HEF1 for Aurora A activation
- Finola E Moore†1,
- Evan C Osmundson†1,
- Jennifer Koblinski2, 3,
- Elena Pugacheva4,
- Erica A Golemis5,
- Dipankar Ray1, 6Email author and
- Hiroaki Kiyokawa1, 3Email author
© Moore et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 15 June 2010
Accepted: 8 September 2010
Published: 8 September 2010
The multi-functional adaptor protein NEDD9/HEF1/Cas-L regulates cell motility, invasion and cell cycle progression, and plays key roles in cancer progression and metastasis. NEDD9 is localized to the centrosome and is required for activation of Aurora A kinase in mitosis. Here we demonstrate that the HECT-WW protein Smurf2 physically associates with NEDD9 and is required for the stability of NEDD9 protein. Smurf2 depletion results in a marked decrease in NEDD9 protein levels, by facilitating polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of NEDD9. Conversely, forced overexpression of Smurf2 results in upregulation of endogenous NEDD9 protein, confirming the role for Smurf2 in NEDD9 stability. Cells with Smurf2 depletion fail to activate Aurora A at the G2/M boundary, leading to a marked delay in mitotic entry. These observations suggest that the stable complex of Smurf2 and NEDD9 is required for timely entry into mitosis via Aurora A activation.
Smurf2 (Smad ubiquitination regulatory factor 2) is a HECT-E3 ligase that negatively regulates TGF-β signaling . Smurf2 targets TGF-β type I receptor, Smad1, Smad2, Smad7, and the transcriptional repressor SnoN for degradation by the proteasome [1–4]. In addition to its role in TGF-β signaling, Smurf2 functions in diverse biological pathways, including those controlling the cell cycle and cell polarity/cytoskeletal remodeling [5–9]. Previous work from our laboratory demonstrated that Smurf2 protein levels vary during the cell cycle, peaking during mitosis . The localization of Smurf2 also undergoes dynamic regulation. Smurf2 is at the centrosome from G1 through prophase, then localizes to the spindle midzone during anaphase, and the midbody during cytokinesis . To date, the best-defined role of Smurf2 in mitosis involves its binding to and stabilization of Mad2, which is required for the spindle assembly checkpoint .
Smurf2 contains WW domains, which mediate interactions with proteins that have PPxY motifs , while Mad2 does not possess any PPxY motif, suggesting other mitosis-relevant partners might exist for Smurf2. For further insight into the cell cycle-regulatory role of Smurf2, we used a candidate-based approach to select for potential Smurf2 interactors, examining those proteins that both contain a PPxY-motif and exhibit a similar subcellular localization pattern. NEDD9 (neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 9, also called HEF1, human enhancer of filamentation 1 and Cas-L Crk-associated substrate related, lymphocyte-type) is a scaffold protein that contains a PPxY motif . NEDD9 displays similar protein expression and localization pattern as Smurf2, rising in G2 and decreasing after mitosis, localizing to the centrosome, midzone, and midbody . The localization of NEDD9 to the centrosome is required for proper mitotic entry . The cell cycle-regulatory function of NEDD9 is mediated, at least partly, by its role for the activation of Aurora A kinase. Centrosomal Aurora A activity is a critical step for mitotic entry from the G2 phase, required for the initial activation of Cyclin B-CDK1 at the centrosome . Among the elements recruited to the centrosome at the G2/M boundary are the activators of Aurora A, such as Ajuba, TPX2 and NEDD9. Thus, NEDD9 plays a significant role in triggering coordinated activation of the mitotic kinase cascade from Aurora A to Cyclin B-CDK1 and perhaps other mitotic kinases required for proper progression of mitosis .
To date, the upstream mechanisms that control the level of NEDD9 protein during mitotic progression have been poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that Smurf2 regulates NEDD9 levels by preventing its proteasomal degradation and this control is rate-limiting for Aurora A activation and mitotic entry. Our data indicate a novel regulatory pathway critical for timely mitotic entry.
Smurf2 and NEDD9 interact
Depletion of Smurf2 destabilizes NEDD9
Regulation of NEDD9 by Smurf2 is mediated by the proteasome
Overexpression of Smurf2 stabilizes NEDD9 in a ligase-independent manner
Smurf2 depletion results in delayed mitotic entry with impaired Aurora A activation
In the present study we have demonstrated the novel regulation of the multi-functional scaffold protein NEDD9 by the WW-HECT protein Smurf2. Physical interaction with Smurf2 leads to stabilization of NEDD9 protein via suppression of polyubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation. Interestingly, stabilization does not appear to depend on the E3 ligase activity of Smurf2. Depletion of Smurf2, as well as NEDD9 depletion, results in impaired activation of Aurora A at the G2/M boundary. These results support the notion that Smurf2 is a critical regulator of entry into mitosis, extending our recent study on the role for Smurf2 in Mad2 regulation and the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint.
Aurora A activation during late G2 is a critical step for commitment to mitosis, and prerequisite for proper activation of Cyclin B-CDK1 and other mitotic kinases . Centrosomal Aurora A activity governs the timing of mitotic entry, triggering nuclear envelop breakdown at prophase . Recent studies demonstrated the requirement for NEDD9 in Aurora A activation and suggested that this scaffold protein is a critical component of mitosis regulation [12, 14]. NEDD9 expression is regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner and peaks in G2 and M, when it accumulates at the centrosome together with Aurora A. NEDD9 together with other Aurora A activators such as TPX2 and Ajuba stimulates autophosphorylation of Aurora A at Thr288, which is required for full activation of the kinase. Aurora A then phosphorylates NEDD9 at Ser296, leading to dissociation of the complex and allowing Aurora A to interact with other substrates. Our finding that Smurf2 promotes Aurora A activation does not exclude possible effects of Smurf2 on other Aurora A regulators such as TPX2 and Ajuba. The mitotic function of NEDD9 could be related to its key role in focal adhesion-dependent migration [reviewed in [19, 20]]. NEDD9 associates with focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and a Src family kinase. Subsequent Src-mediated phosphorylation of NEDD9 creates active SH2 sites, which bind to the adaptor protein Crk. Crk association subsequently recruits DOCK180 and C3G, eliciting signals to the GTPases Rac and Rap, respectively. A number of recent studies suggested the presence of crosstalk between the focal adhesion attachment signaling and the centrosome-based mitosis signaling [21–23]. Multiple components of integrin-mediated migratory signaling including NEDD9 and Pak have been shown to associate with and activate Aurora A at the centrosome. Another centrosomal protein GIT1, which is required for Pak localization to the centrosome, binds to the focal adhesion protein Paxillin. Furthermore, the mitotic LATS1 kinase in complex with the focal adhesion protein Zyxin localizes to microtubules proximal to the centrosome and regulates mitotic initiation . It is noteworthy that LATS1 also possesses a PPxY motif for potential association with the WW domains of Smurf2, although its significance remains to be determined.
Smurf2 also plays multiple roles in cell migration and mitotic regulation [5, 25]. Among the substrates for Smurf2-mediated polyubiquitination are TGF-β type 1 receptor, the GTPase Rap1B, and its closely related homolog, Smurf1 [1, 8, 26]. Smurf1 polyubiquitinates RhoA, talin head domain and hPEM2 [27, 28]. These proteins are all involved in the control of cell migration. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that Smurf2 and Smurf1 are critical regulators of planar cell polarity. Mice deficient for Smurf1 and Smurf2 display defects in planar cell polarity that leads to perturbed stereocilia alignment in neurosensory cells of the cochlea and failed closure of the neural tube . Our recent work provided evidence that Smurf2 is also a regulator of mitosis . Smurf2 expression fluctuates during the cell cycle, with a peak around the G2/M boundary. Smurf2 localizes to the centrosome from interphase until late mitosis, when it moves to the mitotic midbody together with the chromosome passenger complex. Smurf2-depleted cells exhibit multiple defects associated with impaired spindle assembly checkpoint such as premature activation of the anaphase promoting complex (APC) in prometaphase, misaligned and lagging chromosomes during the metaphase to anaphase transition, and failed cytokinesis. These defects are attributable partly to a marked decrease in the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2, as a consequence of accelerated proteasomal degradation. The present study demonstrates that Smurf2 depletion also downregulates NEDD9, which results in impaired Aurora A activation and delayed mitotic entry. The integrin signaling including NEDD9, which governs the basal cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix, determines the orientation of the cell division plane together with the cadherin-mediated planar adhesion signaling. Thus, the crosstalk involving Smurf2, NEDD9 and Aurora A may function as effectors of attachment-sensing mitotic checkpoint. Also, Smurf2 and NEDD9 may collaborate in RhoA activation critical for not only migration but also cytokinesis [26, 29]. Taken together, these data imply that in proliferating cell types Smurf2 controls various protein complexes that are critical for different phases of mitosis, i.e., the NEDD9-Aurora A centrosomal complex in G2 and prophase, the Mad2 spindle checkpoint complex in prometaphase, and the RhoA complex in cytokinesis. Since Smurf2 is known to play diverse roles in the biology of non-proliferative differentiated cells, it will be important to determine whether the mitosis-promoting function of Smurf2 is one of cell type-specific events or a more conserved mechanism of proliferation.
The mechanism with which Smurf2 controls NEDD9 stability remains to be elucidated. The stability of NEDD9 protein is regulated by phosphorylation and subsequent polyubiquitination . In response to TGF-β signals, NEDD9 undergoes polyubiquitination facilitated by physical interaction with Smad3 [17, 31]. Additionally, another member of the WW-HECT family, AIP4 (atrophin 1 interacting protein 4)/Itch, can also target NEDD9 for degradation in a TGF-β-dependent manner . Further, APC/CCdh1 targets NEDD9 for degradation at the end of mitosis . We found that phosphorylated and hyperphosphorylated NEDD9 are stabilized by Smurf2. Though Smurf2 is known as a negative regulator of TGF-β signaling, the NEDD9-stabilizing action of Smurf2 seems unlikely to depend on altered TGF-β signaling. HeLa cells are not typically responsive to TGF-β signals . Further, we found that depletion of Smad3, Smurf1, or AIP4/Itch failed to rescue NEDD9 levels in cells with Smurf2 depletion (data not shown). We believe that the Smurf2 regulation of NEDD9 in mitotic entry occurs through a different mechanism from Smurf2 regulation of Mad2 in the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint. It is likely that Smurf2 interacts with Mad2 and NEDD9 at distinct subcellular locations during mitosis. At the kinetochore and its proximity, Smurf2 may target an intermediary E3 ligase for degradation to stabilize Mad2. In contrast, Smurf2 at the centrosome binds and stabilizes NEDD9 apparently in a ligase-independent fashion. Currently several hypotheses are being evaluated regarding NEDD9 stabilization by Smurf2. Our observation that the catalytically inactive mutant of Smurf2 could also stabilize NEDD9 levels excludes the possibility that Smurf2 targets an intermediary ligase for NEDD9 degradation. Consistent with the ligase-independent function of Smurf2 is a previous report that overexpression of wild-type or ligase-dead Smurf2 induces senescence . Further, AIP4/Itch stabilizes Smad7/TGFβRI complex independently of its ligase activity . Smurf2 also interacts with Smad7, and does not immediately induce its degradation . Interestingly, NEDD9 has been shown to interact with Smad7 . These data also exclude a model in which NEDD9 is stabilized by monoubiquitination. Smurf2 may sequester NEDD9 away from locations in the cell where it could encounter its E3 ligase. Alternatively, Smurf2 may instead mask regulatory epitopes for ubiquitination. Smurf2 may serve as an adaptor for an unidentified regulator that counteracts with another E3 ligase promoting NEDD9 degradation. The ongoing studies are expected to identify the E3 ligase that targets NEDD9 for degradation in response to Smurf2 depletion, and to reveal missing components of the Smurf2-dependent mitosis-regulatory pathway.
Both Smurf2 and NEDD9 are overexpressed in multiple types of cancers. Smurf2 upregulation has been associated with poor prognosis in cancers including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma [37, 38]. Smurf2 has also been found to be upregulated in breast cancer tissue and cell lines as well as ovarian and prostate cancer cell lines . Jin and colleagues found that depletion of Smurf2 by siRNA inhibited migration and invasion, overexpression of Smurf2 led to enhanced migration and invasion . Together, these data suggest that Smurf2 promotes tumor cell migration and invasion. Increased levels of NEDD9 have been found in lung adenocarcinoma , glioblastoma , and melanoma . NEDD9 was identified as one of a few critical genes that mediate metastasis in melanoma  and breast cancer . Mice null for Nedd9 are resistant to MMTV-polyoma T-induced tumorigenesis , recapitulating the significant role for NEDD9 in tumor development. It will be important to determine whether Smurf2 and NEDD9 levels correlate with each other in human cancers. Future studies using human cancer specimens should provide insight into the putative oncogenic interaction of these two proteins in the regulation of cell cycle progression and genomic instability of cancer cells.
The present work demonstrates that Smurf2 positively regulates NEDD9, which is required for Aurora A activation and proper mitotic entry. These data suggest that Smurf2 plays diverse roles in mitotic regulation.
Cell lines and reagents
HeLa human cervical carcinoma cells (ATCC) were cultures under standard conditions of complete medium containing DMEM, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml Penicillin/Streptomycin. CN34 breast cancer cells were cultured as described in . Antibodies used in this study are NEDD9/HEF1/Cas-L (2G9), Ubiquitin (P4D1), normal rabbit IgG, normal mouse IgG from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, California); Smurf2 from Upstate/Millipore (Lake Placid, NY); FLAG M2 and β-Actin (Clone AC-15) from Sigma Aldrich; and Myc from Invitrogen.
Plasmids and siRNA reagents
siRNA was ordered from Dharmacon/Thermo Fisher Scientific for Smurf2 (#1), NEDD9 (smartpool) and control (#3). The sequence for siSm2 was 5'-GAUGAGAACACUCCAAUUAUU-3'. NEDD9 and its mutants were sub-cloned into Myc vector from Sigma Aldrich. FLAG-Smurf2WT and FLAG-Smurf2(C716A) in pCs2+ vector were kindly provided by Gerald Thomsen at Stony Brook University. Smurf2 was sub-cloned into mCherry vector from Clontech. Smurf2si-resistant was created by site-directed mutagenesis (Quickchange from Stratagene) of FLAG-Smurf2 at 4 nucleotides within the region targeted by siSmurf2#1: T631C, G634A, T640G, A643G. For protein and RNA extractions, cells were reverse transfected with 50 nM siRNA using RNAiMax from Invitrogen, then harvested 48 h later. When DNA was transfected, 1 μg of each plasmid per 6D dish was transfected with Lipofectamine2000 from Invitrogen.
For immunoblotting or immunoprecipitation, cells were lysted by sonication in lysis buffer as described previously . Unless otherwise noted, 30 μg total protein lysate was loaded onto gel. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed in HeLa cells that were either asynchronous synchronized at mitosis by 2 mM thymidine 18 h, release for 9 h, 400 ng/μl nocodazole for 14 h. 400 μg total protein was incubated with 1.5 μg of antibody overnight at 4°C. Protein A (for rabbit Smurf2 IPs) or G (for mouse NEDD9 IPs, both from Zymogen) beads were added for 1 h 4°C. Immunoprecipitated materials were loaded onto 2 different gels and probed by Western blot accordingly. For immunoprecipitation with NEDD9 antibody, lysates were pre-cleared with protein G beads for 30 minutes 4°C before incubation with NEDD9 antibody. For NEDD9 immunoprecipitation for ubiquitination, cells were treated for 4 h with 2 μM MG132 44 h post-transfection. Entire immunoprecipitates were loaded onto one gel, gel was transferred onto PVDF membrane as usual, then prepared for Ubiquitin blotting by treatment with 6 M guanidium chloride, 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 mM PMSF (fresh), 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol (fresh) for 30 minutes, 4°C.
RNA was extracted with Agilent kit, 2 μg RNA was used to synthesize cDNA with the Invitrogen Superscript II kit, PCR was performed with 2 μl of cDNA, 27 cycles, Tm or 50°C.
HeLa cells were grown on coverslips and fixed in ice cold methanol for 20 minutes to overnight. Centrosome staining was followed as described previously .
Neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 9, also called HEF1: Human enhancer of filamentation 1, and Cas-L: Crk-associated substrate related, lymphocyte-type
Transforming growth factor
Target protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2
Cyclin dependent kinase 1
LATS2: Large tumor suppressor
green fluorescent protein
short interfering RNA
We thank Qingshen Gao, Kenji Fukasawa, Thomas McGarry, Navdeep Chandel for their critical suggestions, Joan Massague for CN34 cells, and Limin Sun, Brian Zwecker, Thomas O'Grady and Gina Kirsammer for their technical expertise. The work was supported in part by grants provided to H. K. from the National Institutes of Health (CA112282, CA100204, and HD38085), the Northwestern Memorial Foundation, the Searle Leadership Fund, the Zell Fund, the H Foundation, the Lynn Sage Cancer Research Foundation, and the Phi Beta Psi Sorority. The work of EG is supported by grant from the National Institutes of Health (CA63366).
- Kavsak P, Rasmussen RK, Causing CG, Bonni S, Zhu H, Thomsen GH, Wrana JL: Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF beta receptor for degradation. Mol Cell 2000, 6: 1365–1375. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00134-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonni S, Wang HR, Causing CG, Kavsak P, Stroschein SL, Luo K, Wrana JL: TGF-beta induces assembly of a Smad2-Smurf2 ubiquitin ligase complex that targets SnoN for degradation. Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3: 587–595. 10.1038/35078562View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Chang C, Gehling DJ, Hemmati-Brivanlou A, Derynck R: Regulation of Smad degradation and activity by Smurf2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98: 974–979. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.974PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin X, Liang M, Feng XH: Smurf2 is a ubiquitin E3 ligase mediating proteasome-dependent degradation of Smad2 in transforming growth factor-beta signaling. J Biol Chem 2000, 275: 36818–36822. 10.1074/jbc.C000580200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osmundson EC, Ray D, Moore FE, Kiyokawa H: Smurf2 as a novel mitotic regulator: From the spindle assembly checkpoint to tumorigenesis. Cell Div 2009, 4: 14. 10.1186/1747-1028-4-14PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osmundson EC, Ray D, Moore FE, Gao Q, Thomsen GH, Kiyokawa H: The HECT E3 ligase Smurf2 is required for Mad2-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2008, 183: 267–277. 10.1083/jcb.200801049PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Narimatsu M, Bose R, Pye M, Zhang L, Miller B, Ching P, Sakuma R, Luga V, Roncari L, Attisano L, Wrana JL: Regulation of planar cell polarity by Smurf ubiquitin ligases. Cell 2009, 137: 295–307. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.025View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwamborn JC, Muller M, Becker AH, Puschel AW: Ubiquitination of the GTPase Rap1B by the ubiquitin ligase Smurf2 is required for the establishment of neuronal polarity. EMBO J 2007, 26: 1410–1422. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601580PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Q, Huang JH, Sampson ER, Kim KO, Zuscik MJ, O'Keefe RJ, Chen D, Rosier RN: Smurf2 induces degradation of GSK-3beta and upregulates beta-catenin in chondrocytes: a potential mechanism for Smurf2-induced degeneration of articular cartilage. Exp Cell Res 2009, 315: 2386–2398. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.05.019PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ingham RJ, Gish G, Pawson T: The Nedd4 family of E3 ubiquitin ligases: functional diversity within a common modular architecture. Oncogene 2004, 23: 1972–1984. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207436View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Law SF, Estojak J, Wang B, Mysliwiec T, Kruh G, Golemis EA: Human enhancer of filamentation 1, a novel p130cas-like docking protein, associates with focal adhesion kinase and induces pseudohyphal growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16: 3327–3337.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pugacheva EN, Golemis EA: The focal adhesion scaffolding protein HEF1 regulates activation of the Aurora-A and Nek2 kinases at the centrosome. Nat Cell Biol 2005, 7: 937–946. 10.1038/ncb1309PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karthigeyan D, Prasad SB, Shandilya J, Agrawal S, Kundu TK: Biology of Aurora A kinase: Implications in cancer manifestation and therapy. Med Res Rev, in press.
- Pugacheva EN, Golemis EA: HEF1-aurora A interactions: points of dialog between the cell cycle and cell attachment signaling networks. Cell Cycle 2006, 5: 384–391. 10.4161/cc.5.4.2439PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu PJ, Zhou XZ, Shen M, Lu KP: Function of WW domains as phosphoserine- or phosphothreonine-binding modules. Science 1999, 283: 1325–1328. 10.1126/science.283.5406.1325View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Law SF, Zhang YZ, Klein-Szanto AJ, Golemis EA: Cell cycle-regulated processing of HEF1 to multiple protein forms differentially targeted to multiple subcellular compartments. Mol Cell Biol 1998, 18: 3540–3551.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu X, Elia AE, Law SF, Golemis EA, Farley J, Wang T: A novel ability of Smad3 to regulate proteasomal degradation of a Cas family member HEF1. EMBO J 2000, 19: 6759–6769. 10.1093/emboj/19.24.6759PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Portier N, Audhya A, Maddox PS, Green RA, Dammermann A, Desai A, Oegema K: A microtubule-independent role for centrosomes and aurora a in nuclear envelope breakdown. Dev Cell 2007, 12: 515–529. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.019PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Neill GM, Seo S, Serebriiskii IG, Lessin SR, Golemis EA: A new central scaffold for metastasis: parsing HEF1/Cas-L/NEDD9. Cancer Res 2007, 67: 8975–8979. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1328PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Neill GM, Golemis EA: Proteolysis of the docking protein HEF1 and implications for focal adhesion dynamics. Mol Cell Biol 2001, 21: 5094–5108. 10.1128/MCB.21.15.5094-5108.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao ZS, Lim JP, Ng YW, Lim L, Manser E: The GIT-associated kinase PAK targets to the centrosome and regulates Aurora-A. Mol Cell 2005, 20: 237–249. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.08.035View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cotteret S, Chernoff J: Pak GITs to Aurora-A. Dev Cell 2005, 9: 573–574. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.10.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turner CE, West KA, Brown MC: Paxillin-ARF GAP signaling and the cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001, 13: 593–599. 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00256-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirota T, Morisaki T, Nishiyama Y, Marumoto T, Tada K, Hara T, Masuko N, Inagaki M, Hatakeyama K, Saya H: Zyxin, a regulator of actin filament assembly, targets the mitotic apparatus by interacting with h-warts/LATS1 tumor suppressor. J Cell Biol 2000, 149: 1073–1086. 10.1083/jcb.149.5.1073PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Matesic LE: The Nedd4-like family of E3 ubiquitin ligases and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2007, 26: 587–604. 10.1007/s10555-007-9091-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukunaga E, Inoue Y, Komiya S, Horiguchi K, Goto K, Saitoh M, Miyazawa K, Koinuma D, Hanyu A, Imamura T: Smurf2 induces ubiquitin-dependent degradation of Smurf1 to prevent migration of breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2008, 283: 35660–35667. 10.1074/jbc.M710496200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang HR, Ogunjimi AA, Zhang Y, Ozdamar B, Bose R, Wrana JL: Degradation of RhoA by Smurf1 ubiquitin ligase. Methods Enzymol 2006, 406: 437–447. 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)06032-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang C: Roles of E3 ubiquitin ligases in cell adhesion and migration. Cell Adh Migr 4: 10–18. 10.4161/cam.4.1.9834
- Dadke D, Jarnik M, Pugacheva EN, Singh MK, Golemis EA: Deregulation of HEF1 impairs M-phase progression by disrupting the RhoA activation cycle. Mol Biol Cell 2006, 17: 1204–1217. 10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0237PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng M, McKeown-Longo PJ: Regulation of HEF1 expression and phosphorylation by TGF-beta 1 and cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 2002, 277: 39599–39608. 10.1074/jbc.M202263200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nourry C, Maksumova L, Pang M, Liu X, Wang T: Direct interaction between Smad3, APC10, CDH1 and HEF1 in proteasomal degradation of HEF1. BMC Cell Biol 2004, 5: 20. 10.1186/1471-2121-5-20PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feng L, Guedes S, Wang T: Atrophin-1-interacting protein 4/human Itch is a ubiquitin E3 ligase for human enhancer of filamentation 1 in transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 29681–29690. 10.1074/jbc.M403221200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maliekal TT, Anto RJ, Karunagaran D: Differential activation of Smads in HeLa and SiHa cells that differ in their response to transforming growth factor-beta. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 36287–36292. 10.1074/jbc.M404568200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang H, Cohen SN: Smurf2 up-regulation activates telomere-dependent senescence. Genes Dev 2004, 18: 3028–3040. 10.1101/gad.1253004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lallemand F, Seo SR, Ferrand N, Pessah M, L'Hoste S, Rawadi G, Roman-Roman S, Camonis J, Atfi A: AIP4 restricts transforming growth factor-beta signaling through a ubiquitination-independent mechanism. J Biol Chem 2005, 280: 27645–27653. 10.1074/jbc.M500188200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inamoto S, Iwata S, Inamoto T, Nomura S, Sasaki T, Urasaki Y, Hosono O, Kawasaki H, Tanaka H, Dang NH, Morimoto C: Crk-associated substrate lymphocyte type regulates transforming growth factor-beta signaling by inhibiting Smad6 and Smad7. Oncogene 2007, 26: 893–904. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209848View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukuchi M, Fukai Y, Masuda N, Miyazaki T, Nakajima M, Sohda M, Manda R, Tsukada K, Kato H, Kuwano H: High-level expression of the Smad ubiquitin ligase Smurf2 correlates with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 2002, 62: 7162–7165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukasawa H, Yamamoto T, Fujigaki Y, Misaki T, Ohashi N, Takayama T, Suzuki S, Mugiya S, Oda T, Uchida C, et al.: Reduction of transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor is caused by the enhanced ubiquitin-dependent degradation in human renal cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2010, 127: 1517–1525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jin C, Yang YA, Anver MR, Morris N, Wang X, Zhang YE: Smad ubiquitination regulatory factor 2 promotes metastasis of breast cancer cells by enhancing migration and invasiveness. Cancer Res 2009, 69: 735–740. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1463PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Izumchenko E, Singh MK, Plotnikova OV, Tikhmyanova N, Little JL, Serebriiskii IG, Seo S, Kurokawa M, Egleston BL, Klein-Szanto A, et al.: NEDD9 promotes oncogenic signaling in mammary tumor development. Cancer Res 2009, 69: 7198–7206. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0795PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Natarajan M, Stewart JE, Golemis EA, Pugacheva EN, Alexandropoulos K, Cox BD, Wang W, Grammer JR, Gladson CL: HEF1 is a necessary and specific downstream effector of FAK that promotes the migration of glioblastoma cells. Oncogene 2006, 25: 1721–1732. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209199View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim M, Gans JD, Nogueira C, Wang A, Paik JH, Feng B, Brennan C, Hahn WC, Cordon-Cardo C, Wagner SN, et al.: Comparative oncogenomics identifies NEDD9 as a melanoma metastasis gene. Cell 2006, 125: 1269–1281. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minn AJ, Gupta GP, Siegel PM, Bos PD, Shu W, Giri DD, Viale A, Olshen AB, Gerald WL, Massague J: Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature 2005, 436: 518–524. 10.1038/nature03799PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bos PD, Zhang XH, Nadal C, Shu W, Gomis RR, Nguyen DX, Minn AJ, van de Vijver MJ, Gerald WL, Foekens JA, Massague J: Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Nature 2009, 459: 1005–1009. 10.1038/nature08021PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.