Cell division is positively regulated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) partnered with cyclins and negatively regulated by CDK inhibitors. In the frog, Xenopus laevis, three types of CDK inhibitors have been described: p27Xic1 (Xic1) which shares sequence homology with both p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 from mammals, p16Xic2 (Xic2) which shares sequence homology with p21Cip1, and p17Xic3 (Xic3) which shares sequence homology with p27Kip1. While past studies have demonstrated that during DNA polymerase switching, Xic1 is targeted for protein turnover dependent upon DNA, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA), and the ubiquitin ligase CRL4Cdt2, little is known about the processes that regulate Xic2 or Xic3.
We used the Xenopus interphase egg extract as a model system to examine the regulation of Xic2 by proteolysis and phosphorylation.
Our studies indicated that following primer synthesis during the initiation of DNA replication, Xic2 is targeted for DNA- and PCNA-dependent ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis and that Cdt2 can promote Xic2 turnover. Additionally, during interphase, Xic2 is phosphorylated by CDK2 at Ser-98 and Ser-131 in a DNA-independent manner, inhibiting Xic2 turnover. In the presence of double-stranded DNA ends, Xic2 is also phosphorylated at Ser-78 and Ser-81 by a caffeine-sensitive kinase, but this phosphorylation does not alter Xic2 turnover. Conversely, in the presence or absence of DNA, Xic3 was stable in the Xenopus interphase egg extract and did not exhibit a shift indicative of phosphorylation.
During interphase, Xic2 is targeted for DNA- and PCNA-dependent proteolysis that is negatively regulated by CDK2 phosphorylation. During a response to DNA damage, Xic2 may be alternatively regulated by phosphorylation by a caffeine-sensitive kinase. Our studies suggest that the three types of Xenopus CDK inhibitors, Xic1, Xic2, and Xic3 appear to be uniquely regulated which may reflect their specialized roles during cell division or early development in the frog.
The vertebrate cell cycle is positively regulated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and negatively regulated by CDK inhibitors . Vertebrate CDK inhibitors of the Cip/Kip-type bind to and negatively regulate CDK2-cyclins E/A and the onset of DNA replication . Cip-type CDK inhibitors also bind to and negatively regulate the replication protein, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) . Studies have indicated that mammalian Cip/Kip-type CDK inhibitors are frequently targeted for ubiquitin-mediated protein turnover during the G1 to S phase transition resulting in the activation of CDK2-cyclins and the progression into S phase [4–8].
In the frog, Xenopus laevis, three Cip/Kip-type CDK inhibitors have been identified that share sequence homology with mammalian p21Cip1 (p21), p27Kip1 (p27), and p57Kip2 (p57) [9–11]. p27Xic1/p28Kix1 (Xic1/Kix1) shares homology with all three of the mammalian Cip/Kip-type CDK inhibitors while p16Xic2 (Xic2) is more closely related to p21 and p17Xic3 (Xic3) is more closely related to p27 [9–11]. Developmental studies suggest that Xic1 is the only CDK inhibitor that is expressed in the early embryo and studies indicate that Xic1 is required for both the differentiation of nerve and muscles cells [11–18]. The expression of both Xic2 and Xic3 appears to be more tissue-specific in nature with Xic2 found in somites, the tail bud, lens, and the cement gland while Xic3 is expressed primarily in the central nervous system . While overexpression of Xic2 and Xic3 in the developing embryo results in an arrest in cell division due to an inhibition of CDK2 activity, little is known about the possible regulatory pathways that may control the activities of Xic2 or Xic3 .
Using the Xenopus interphase egg extract as a model biochemical system to study DNA replication initiation and CDK inhibitor regulation, studies have demonstrated that Xic1 is targeted for ubiquitination by the ubiquitin ligase, CRL4Cdt2, in a DNA- and PCNA-dependent manner during DNA polymerase switching resulting in its degradation [19–21]. In an effort to understand the possible molecular mechanisms that may regulate Xic2 and Xic3, we have taken a similar approach and used the Xenopus interphase egg extract as a biochemical model system to study Xic2 and Xic3. Our results suggest that while Xic3 appears to be stable in the Xenopus extract, Xic2 is targeted for ubiquitination and phosphorylation in the extract in a manner that is dependent upon specific DNA templates.
Xenopus Cip/Kip-type CDK inhibitors are differentially modified in the interphase egg extract
To study the regulation of the Xenopus CDK inhibitor, Xic1, we have previously used the biochemically tractable egg extract as a model system . In these studies, we have dissected the molecular mechanism of Xic1 turnover and have found that Xic1 is degraded in the egg extract during DNA polymerase switching in a DNA-, PCNA-, and CRL4Cdt2-dependent manner [19–23]. CRL4Cdt2 is a member of the Cullin-RING-type ubiquitin ligases which includes CRL1Skp2, previously shown to ubiquitinate Xic1 in vitro . Using the interphase egg extract, we found that Xic3 was completely stable in the egg extract, Xic2 was partially degraded and partially modified in a manner resembling ubiquitination and/or phosphorylation (Figure 1A), and Xic1 was readily degraded as shown in previous studies . The Xic2 modification resembling ubiquitination appeared to be DNA-dependent while the putative phosphorylation of Xic2 (band migrating at ~22 kDa) was not dependent upon the presence of DNA (Figure 1A). To further examine the modified species of Xic2, we added methyl ubiquitin to stabilize monoubiquitination and prevent polyubiquitination  and found that the higher molecular weight forms of Xic2 were stabilized indicating that they represent monoubiquitinated Xic2 species (Figure 1B). We also noticed that while the unmodified form of Xic2 decreased as the ubiquitinated forms of Xic2 increased, the modified form of Xic2 which may represent phosphorylated Xic2 remained stable (Figure 1B). Cellular localization studies indicated that both the ubiquitinated forms and the putative phosphorylated form of Xic2 were localized predominantly to the nucleus (Figure 1C) . These studies suggest that the unmodified form of Xic2 can be degraded by a DNA and ubiquitin-dependent pathway in the interphase egg extract while the putative phosphorylated form of Xic1 may be resistant to ubiquitination and degradation.
To examine Xic2 in a more physiological manner, we generated an antibody to Xic2 and immunoblotted the Xic2 protein in the Xenopus interphase egg extract and in Xenopus Tissue Culture (XTC) cells. We found that Xic2 was present at very low levels in the interphase egg extract following immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting (Figure 1D, left panel), while in XTC cells, Xic2 was readily detectable as a single protein band (Figure 1D, left panel). Moreover, we found that following ionizing irradiation (IR) of XTC cells, the expression of Xic2 was greatly increased and was easily detectable by direct immunoblotting (Figure 1D, right panel). This result suggests that Xic2 is not highly expressed in the early embryo, but becomes more highly expressed in somatic cells. Additionally, this result suggests that like mammalian p21 , Xic2 is highly induced following exposure to IR.
Xic2 is uniquely phosphorylated during the cell cycle and in response to single-stranded DNA
To characterize the nature of the DNA-independent modified Xic2 species, we examined Xic2 in the membrane-free interphase high speed supernatant (HSS), the membrane-containing interphase LSS, and a stable mitotic extract (Δ90 extract) generated by supplementing interphase extract with non-degradable cyclin B [19, 21]. In the absence of DNA, we observed a putative phosphoform of Xic2 in both the HSS and LSS that was reversed by phosphatase treatment (Figure 2A). Moreover, multiple Xic2 phosphoforms observed to be diminished by phosphatase were present in the mitotic extract suggesting potentially multiple sites of Xic2 phosphorylation during mitosis (Figure 2A). Similar studies resulted in no detectable shift of the Xic3 protein band in either interphase or mitotic egg extracts (data not shown) while previous studies have demonstrated that Xic1 is phosphorylated in the mitotic extract [9, 19]. To further examine the phosphorylation of Xic2 and the DNA-dependent turnover of Xic2, we examined Xic2 in different extract systems with alternative DNA templates. In the membrane-containing LSS, Xic2 was stable in the absence of DNA and in the presence of super-coiled plasmid DNA, but was roughly 50% degraded in the presence of single-stranded DNA and sperm chromatin (Figure 2B). As noted above, Xic2 exhibited a single DNA-independent phosphoform in the interphase extract which we term “phosphoform 1” (Figure 2B and D). Curiously, in addition to phosphoform 1, Xic2 exhibited at least two additional shifts we term “phosphoforms 2” in both the LSS and HSS only in the presence of single-stranded DNA (Figure 2B, C, and D). To determine if any of the modified forms of Xic2 altered Xic2’s ability to associate with cyclin E in the egg extract, we performed an immunoprecipitation reaction using anti-cyclin E antibody and found that all the modified forms of Xic2 could readily associate with cyclin E (Figure 2E).
Xic2 turnover is dependent upon PCNA and PCNA binding
Previous studies identified a requirement for PCNA and PCNA binding for Xic1 turnover and determined the timing of Xic1 turnover was during the DNA polymerase switching step of DNA replication initiation . To examine the timing of Xic2 turnover, we added aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerases . Our studies indicated that Xic2 turnover was inhibited by the addition of aphidicolin suggesting Xic2 proteolysis likely requires the activity of DNA polymerase α and the timing of Xic2 degradation occurs following the synthesis of a DNA primer, similar to Xic1 (Figure 3A) . We next identified a consensus P CNA-i nteracting p rotein (PIP) box motif (117QKLITDFY124) within the C-terminus of Xic2 with shared sequence homology to both human p21 and Xenopus Xic1 (Figure 3B, left top panel). When we tested the ability of Xic2 to associate with PCNA in the Xenopus egg extract, we found that wildtype Xic2 could readily associate with PCNA (Figure 3B, left bottom panel, lane 1). To study a requirement for PCNA binding in Xic2 proteolysis, we mutated a conserved hydrophobic residue of Xic2 within the PIP box (F123) (Figure 3B left panels) and examined this mutant in a degradation assay (Figure 3B, middle and right panels). Past studies have indicated that key conserved hydrophobic residues within the PIP box of p21 and Xic1 are critical for binding to PCNA and consistent with this finding, mutation of Xic2 F123 completely disrupted its ability to bind PCNA in the egg extract (Figure 3B, left bottom panel) [21, 27, 28]. We found that at the 1.5 and 3 hour time points, the Xic2-F123A point mutant was significantly reduced for ubiquitination compared to wildtype Xic2 (Figure 3C, middle and right panels), suggesting that PCNA binding to Xic2 plays an important role in Xic2 ubiquitination. We also noted a moderate effect on Xic2 turnover (Figure 3B, middle panel). To explore the role of PCNA in Xic2 turnover further, we depleted PCNA from the Xenopus extract and studied Xic2 turnover (Figure 3C). The results showed that in the absence of PCNA, Xic2 ubiquitination and turnover were inhibited, again suggesting that PCNA plays an important role in Xic2 proteolysis (Figure 3C, middle and right panels).
The addition of Cdt2, but not Skp2, promotes the turnover of Xic2
Past studies have indicated that many substrates of the ubiquitin pathway that require PCNA and PCNA binding for their proteolysis are frequently targeted for ubiquitination by the CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin ligase [29, 30]. CRL4Cdt2 has been shown to ubiquitinate several substrates in a PCNA-dependent manner including Xic1, p21, and Cdt1 [29, 30]. Because our studies suggest that the ubiquitination of Xic2 is dependent upon PCNA, we examined whether Xic2 could associate with Cdt2, the substrate binding component of CRL4. Surprisingly, using a GST pull-down assay, our studies indicated that Xic2 did not readily bind to in vitro translated Cdt2 compared to Xic1 and p21 (Figure 4A). To further explore a possible role for CRL4Cdt2 in Xic2 turnover, we supplemented the extract with Cdt2 to determine whether this could promote the turnover of Xic2. Our previous studies have shown that for Xic1 turnover, Cdt2 is limiting in the egg extract . Our studies showed that the addition of unlabeled in vitro translated Cdt2 promoted the degradation of Xic2 compared to the addition of unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate, while the addition of in vitro translated Skp2 did not (Figure 4B). Moreover, the concurrent addition of both the CDK inhibitor p27 to prevent Xic2 phosphorylation and Cdt2, significantly promoted the turnover of Xic2, beyond the promotion observed by adding either component individually (Figure 4B). These studies suggest that Cdt2 plays a role in Xic2 ubiquitination and that Xic2 may only associate tightly with Cdt2 in the context of replicating DNA as has been proposed for Xenopus Cdt1 .
Xic2 phosphorylation by CDK2 inhibits its proteolysis during interphase
Upon examination of Xic2 in the presence of XSC in the Xenopus LSS, it is apparent that Xic2 is simultaneously targeted for phosphorylation and proteolysis. However, the proteolysis of Xic2 in the interphase extract is not highly efficient, especially when compared to the proteolysis of Xic1 under the same conditions (Figure 1A). We hypothesized that perhaps the phosphorylation of Xic2 may be negatively regulating the turnover of Xic2. A well-characterized active kinase in the Xenopus interphase extract is CDK2-cyclin E [13, 31] and to explore whether CDK2 activity may inhibit Xic2 turnover, we examined the effect of CDK2 inhibitors on Xic2 stability. Because CDK2 activity is required for DNA replication initiation in the LSS and Xic2 is degraded during DNA polymerase switching following the CDK2 requirement (Figure 3A), for these studies, it was necessary to use the HSS with single-stranded DNA which supports DNA polymerase switching and Xic2 turnover, but does not require CDK activity . In the presence of either roscovitine or the CDK inhibitor p27, Xic2 turnover in the extract was significantly accelerated compared to the negative controls (DMSO and GST) (Figure 5A). Additionally, in the presence of CDK inhibitors and in absence of DNA, the Xic2 protein bands remained unshifted indicating that the phosphoforms of Xic2 observed in the absence of DNA and CDK inhibitors is due to CDK2 phosphorylation (Figure 5A).
To directly test the role of CDK2 phosphorylation on Xic2 stability, we mutated the three possible CDK consensus sites within Xic2 individually and in combination to alanine to prevent phosphorylation (Figure 5B, C, D). Mutation of residue Thr-58 (T58) had little effect on Xic2 turnover, while mutation of residues Ser-98 (S98) or Ser-131 (S131) both resulted in more efficient proteolysis of Xic2 (Figure 5C). Additionally, mutation of S98 abolished phosphoform 1 of Xic2 suggesting that phosphorylation of Xic2 at residue 98 is responsible for the shifted phosphoform 1 of Xic2 in the interphase extract (Figure 5C). Simultaneous triple mutation of Xic2 at residues T58, S98, and S131 resulted in a Xic2 mutant that did not exhibit a shift and was efficiently degraded in the interphase extract compared to wildtype Xic2 (18% Xic2 remaining for the T58A, S98A, S131A mutant compared to 75% remaining for WT Xic2) (Figure 5D). We further generated glutamic acid mutations of Xic2 at residues S98 and S131 to mimic constitutive phosphorylation and tested these Xic2 mutants for turnover. Our studies indicated that the Xic2-S98E, S131E double mutant and the S98E and S131E single point mutants were all degraded similarly or less efficiently than the wildtype Xic2 that is phosphorylated in the extract (Xic2 WT and the E mutants are degraded to approximately 50% of Xic2 remaining, Figure 5E, versus 18% for the Xic2 triple alanine mutant that is not phosphorylated, Figure 5D). This result is consistent with our hypothesis that Xic2 phosphorylation in the extract inhibits its turnover. Taken together, these studies suggest that CDK2-dependent phosphorylation of Xic2 at residues S98 and S131 negatively regulates its ubiquitination and degradation during interphase.
Xic2 is hyperphosphorylated at residues S78/S81 in a manner dependent upon single-stranded DNA and a caffeine-sensitive kinase
In the interphase egg extract, in addition to the DNA-independent phosphorylation of Xic2 by CDK2-cyclin (Figures 2 and 5, phosphoform 1), we have also observed an additional DNA-dependent shift in the presence of single-stranded DNA (Figure 2, B and C, phosphoforms 2). The DNA-dependent phosphorylation of Xic2 causes a doublet of Xic2 to appear in the presence of single-stranded DNA with a slower migration than phosphoform 1 resulting from CDK2 phosphorylation of residue S98 (Figure 2B, C, D and Figure 5). Previous studies have indicated that single-stranded DNA in the interphase egg extract is replicated to form double-stranded DNA ends which trigger activation of the checkpoint kinase, Ataxia Telangiectasia-related protein (ATR), and induce the phosphorylation of Chk2 [32, 33]. Consistent with these previous findings, we observed that the timing of the ssDNA-dependent mobility shift of Xic2 coincided with the appearance of a Chk2 shift in the presence of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) ends (Figure 6A). Moreover, the Xic2 shifts observed in the presence of ssDNA or replicated dsDNA ends (phosphoforms 2) was prevented by the addition of caffeine, a known inhibitor of Class IV Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI 3-kinases or PI3Ks) such as ATR [32, 33], suggesting that an ATM/ATR-like kinase may be responsible for phosphorylating Xic2 in the presence of ssDNA (Figure 6B). We also noted a modest increase in Xic2 turnover in the presence of caffeine perhaps indicating that the phosphorylation of Xic2 in the presence of ssDNA may be partially stabilizing (Figure 6B). To further characterize the modification of Xic2 in the presence of ssDNA, we examined Xic2 in the presence of a variety of DNA templates in the Xenopus interphase egg extract. Our studies showed that Xic2 did not exhibit the “phosphoforms 2” modification in the presence of buffer, XSC, or uncut plasmid DNA (Figure 6C). In contrast, Xic2 phosphoforms 2 were observed to varying degrees in the presence of ssDNA, nicked dsDNA, UV-damaged DNA, and linearized plasmid DNA (Figure 6C). These studies suggest that damaged DNA templates or DNA templates which mimic damaged DNA activate a caffeine-sensitive kinase that phosphorylates Xic2. Notably, in the presence of aphidicolin, these caffeine-sensitive modifications of Xic2 are inhibited (Figure 3A).
An examination of the potential sites targeted for phosphorylation of Xic2 in the presence of ssDNA revealed two residues at S78 and S81 that matched the S/T-Q consensus site for ATM-ATR-like kinases (Figure 6D, top). Mutation of these two residues to alanine (S78A, S81A) completely eliminated the Xic2 phosphoforms 2 in the presence of ssDNA compared to wildtype Xic2 (Figure 6D, bottom, samples for “S78A, S81A” and “S78A, S81A, S98A”). Phosphorylation of Xic2 by the caffeine-sensitive kinase in the presence of ssDNA does not appear to be dependent upon prior or concurrent phosphorylation of Xic2 by CDK2-cyclin as shown by the shift of a Xic2-S98A mutant (Figure 6D) and by the ability of Xic2 to be phosphorylated in an ssDNA-dependent manner in the presence of roscovitine (data not shown). This suggests that the interphase phosphorylation of Xic2 by CDK2 and the caffeine-sensitive kinase function along independent pathways.
In the initial description of Xic2, the expression of Xic2 RNA was described to be initially low during stages 10–11, increasing at stage 18, with the highest expression at stage 25 with staining appearing predominantly in the developing somite, tail bud, lens, and cement gland suggesting a role in developmental patterning (Figure 7B, top) . This is in contrast to the expression of Xic1 which is observed earlier during development and increases significantly following gastrulation (Figure 7B, top) or the expression of Xic3 that is very low until after stage 28 with a peak at stage 38 indicating that Xic3 functions during late embryonic patterning (Figure 7B, top) [11, 12, 14, 16, 24]. Xic3 was found to be stable in the interphase egg extract suggesting that the machinery or regulators that control Xic3 stability may not be appreciably expressed or activated in the Xenopus egg.
Our studies suggest that like mammalian p21, Xic2 protein levels appear to be induced upon treatment with IR . This result suggests that in addition to a role in development, Xic2 may also play a role in a DNA damage checkpoint with Xic2 levels increasing during DNA damage, similar to Xic1, to presumably halt entry into S phase to allow DNA repair to occur (Figure 7B, bottom right) . Consistent with this hypothesis, Xic2 appears to be phosphorylated by a caffeine-sensitive kinase in the presence of double-stranded DNA ends, a signal shown to activate a DNA damage checkpoint in the interphase egg extract [32, 33] (Figure 7A). Under the same conditions, XCds1 (Xenopus Chk2) has been shown to be phosphorylated and this phosphorylation is inhibited by a block to DNA replication and by caffeine suggesting Xic2 may be modulated by the same checkpoint pathway as XCds1 . How the phosphorylation of Xic2 at residues S78 and S81 may influence its CDK2 inhibitory activity or binding to CDK2 and PCNA are currently under further investigation.
The fact that Xic2 is readily ubiquitinated and degraded in the interphase egg extract when CDK2 phosphorylation is inhibited suggests that the ubiquitination machinery that targets Xic2 for degradation is present in the egg. Our past studies of the Xenopus interphase egg extract suggest that the CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin ligase is active in the extract while the SCFSkp2 ubiquitin ligase is not due to very low expression of Skp2 in the egg [20, 24]. Our results demonstrating the dependence of Xic2 proteolysis on PCNA and DNA, the timing of Xic2 ubiquitination and degradation, and the ability of Cdt2 to promote Xic2 turnover are all consistent with CRL4Cdt2 being the ubiquitin ligase of Xic2 in the egg extract. It is then somewhat puzzling that Xic2 does not readily bind to Cdt2 under conditions that efficiently support Xic1 and Cdt2 binding. Similar to p21 and Xic1, Xic2 bears the “specialized PIP box” described by Havens and Walters [29, 35] which contains a PIP box that binds PCNA with high affinity (contains the TD motif) followed by a basic residue at the +4 position relative to the PIP box. Our findings suggest that Xic2 may more closely resemble the replication protein and CRL4Cdt2 substrate, Cdt1, in requiring the presence of DNA to appreciably bind to Cdt2. However, unlike Cdt1, Xic2 readily binds PCNA in the absence of DNA. It is also possible that Xic2 is only indirectly targeted by Cdt2 or that Xic2 is additionally targeted by an alternative E3 in the egg extract, although our studies indicated that the addition of Skp2 did not promote Xic2 turnover. It is interesting to note that sequence analyses revealed a KEN box present in both Xic2 (83KENQCQD89) and Xic1 (138KENAEKI144) suggesting that Xic2 and Xic1 may be targeted for ubiquitination by the ubiquitin ligase, APCCdh1. However, Cdh1 expression in the Xenopus egg is very low and it is not appreciably expressed until after gastrulation .
Using the Xenopus model extract system, we have evidence to support that Xic2 is phosphorylated in a CDK2 dependent manner, most likely by CDK2-cyclin E, the predominant CDK activity in the interphase egg extract  (Figure 7A). The phosphorylation of Xic2 at residues S98 and S131 appear to equally inhibit the ubiquitination and degradation of Xic2 in the extract. The inhibition of Xic2 turnover by CDK2 phosphorylation may be due to a change in the cell localization of Xic2 upon phosphorylation although this is unlikely to be the predominant contributing factor since our degradation studies using the HSS extract which does not contain nuclear membrane precursors and does not support nuclei formation  still showed that CDK2 phosphorylated Xic2 was inhibited for degradation. Alternatively, Xic2 phosphorylation by CDK2 may influence the binding of Xic2 to PCNA, DNA, or the ubiquitination machinery. The finding that CDK2 phosphorylation of Xic2 inhibits its PCNA-dependent turnover suggests that Xic2 phosphorylation may be an important regulator of Xic2 stability and function.
In this study, we provide the first biochemical examination of the regulation of the Xenopus CDK inhibitors, p16Xic2 and p17Xic3, using the egg extract model system. Our studies indicate that Xic2 is targeted for DNA- and PCNA-dependent ubiquitination and degradation in the interphase egg extract and that this turnover of Xic2 is promoted by Cdt2 and inhibited by CDK2-dependent phosphorylation of Xic2 at residues Ser-98 and Ser-131. Additionally, it appears that during conditions mimicking a DNA damage checkpoint, Xic2 is targeted for phosphorylation by a caffeine-sensitive kinase at residues Ser-78 and Ser-81, although the consequence of this phosphorylation is still unclear. Xic3 appears to be stable in the interphase egg extract in the presence or absence of DNA.
In their initial discovery of Xic2, Daniels et al.  described Xic2 as an ortholog of mammalian p21 which is known to be transcriptionally induced by p53 upon DNA damage. p21 has also been shown to be a substrate of both CRL4Cdt2 and SCFSkp2
[38–40]. The RNA expression pattern of Xic2 in somites, the tail bud, the lens, and the cement gland suggest that Xic2 protein is expressed during late embryonic development , but how Xic2 protein may be regulated by proteolysis during development remains unknown. It will be important to study how Xic2 may be regulated by PCNA, CRL4Cdt2, or CDK2 during developmental patterning. It will also be necessary to study Xic1, Xic2, and Xic3 and their regulators in the context of the developing embryo and the somatic cell to fully understand how these three Xenopus CDK inhibitors mediate the events of early development and cell cycle control in the frog.
Preparation of Xenopus extracts and demembranated sperm chromatin
Xenopus interphase extracts [low speed supernatant (LSS) and high speed supernatant (HSS)] , stable Δ90 mitotic extract (LSS supplemented with Δ90 non-degradable cyclin B), and demembranated Xenopus sperm chromatin (XSC) [19, 41, 42] were prepared as previously described. All studies involving animals were conducted according to the rules established by the Universities of Federation for Animal Welfare, the World Society for the Protection of Animals Working Party, and the American Veterinary Medical Association. This work was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio which is accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care under protocols 99045I-04-06-A and 11073x.
Xenopus Tissue Culture (XTC) cells were propagated at room temperature in L-15 medium with L-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco-BRL) and 50 ug/ml of penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco-BRL). Cells were irradiated with 10 Gy using a 137Cesium source Mark I Model 68A irradiator and harvested 4 and 8 hours later in RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 1mM EDTA, 0.15 M NaCl, 1% Np-40 and 1% Sodium Deoxycholate) containing protease inhibitors (Sigma, P8340).
Generation of Xic2 mutants and other constructs
All point mutants of Xic2 in pCS2+ were generated by using pCS2+-Xic2 as the template and the QuickChange™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) followed by DNA sequencing to confirm the mutagenesis. Mutagenesis primer sequences are available upon request. pGEX4T-Xic2 was generated by subcloning a PCR fragment of Xic2 using pCS2+-Xic2 as the template into the BamHI and SalI restriction sites of pGEX4T-1.
Production of Xic2 antibody and other antibodies
GST-Xic2 expressed in BL21Star (DE3) was purified using Glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Rabbit polyclonal antibody against GST-Xic2 was generated by the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio SACI antibody core facility. Anti-PCNA mouse monoclonal antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz (P-10) and anti-GST-XCyclin E antibody was a gift from Peter K. Jackson and Marc W. Kirschner.
In vitro transcription and translation
In vitro transcription and translation reactions were performed using the SP6 TNT coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) and 35S-methionine from New England Nuclear.
Dephosphorylation and inhibition assays
Dephosphorylation of protein samples was performed using lambda phosphatase (λ-PPase) (New England Biolab, P0753S). Reactions were incubated at 30°C for 30 min in the presence of 80 or 200 units of λ-PPase, terminated by the addition of protein loading dye, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimager. Roscovitine (A. G. Scientific Inc, R-1016) was used as previously described to inhibit CDK2 activity . Caffeine (Sigma) was used at a final concentration of 10 mM from fresh stocks of 75 mM in XB- (100 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.7).
GST pull down assays, immunoblotting, and immunoprecipiation
GST pull down assays using egg extract and immunoblotting were performed as previously described except the binding reactions were conducted at 4°C for 2 hours [21, 22]. Rabbit serum against Xic2 was used to immunoprecipitate and immunoblot Xic2 in extracts. Anti-cyclin E antibody was used to immunoprecipiate cyclin E from extracts while anti-PCNA antibody was used for immunoblots. Normal rabbit serum was used as a control for immunoprecipitations.
Degradation assay, nuclei spin down assay, and phosphorylation shift assay
Degradation assays were performed as previously described  with the following modifications. Proteins labeled with 35S-methionine were added to extracts at a final dilution of 1:15 in the presence or absence of 10 ng/ul demembranated XSC or ΦX174 single-stranded DNA (New England Biolab, N3023S). The reactions were analyzed by PhosphorImager and quantitation was performed using ImageQuant™ software (Molecular Dynamics). The percentage of protein remaining for each sample was determined by normalizing the amount of protein at the 0 hr time point to 100%. Nuclei spin down assays were performed as previously described [23, 24] with the following minor modifications. LSS was incubated with ubiquitin (3 ug/ul), 35S-methionine labeled Xic2 at a final dilution of 1:15, and XSC (10 ng/ul) for 90 min at 23°C. When indicated, methyl ubiquitin was added to a final concentration of 3 ug/ul. Ubiquitin (Sigma) was methylated as previously described . In vitro translated Chk2 (XCds1-pCS2+) or Xic2 was added to HSS and incubated for 0 to 3 hours in the presence or absence of double-stranded DNA ends that were generated from annealed oligonucleotides .
Low speed supernatant
High speed supernatant
Xenopus sperm chromatin
Polymerase chain reaction
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
Calf intestinal phosphatase
Rabbit reticulocyte lysate
In vitro translated.
We are grateful to all the past and present members of the Yew lab for helpful discussions, in particular, Li-Chiou Chuang and Horng-Ru Lin; Shin-ichi Ohnuma for kindly providing pCS2+-Xic2 and pCS2+-Xic3 plasmids; Peter K. Jackson and Marc W. Kirschner for anti-GST-XCyclin E antibodies; Li-Chiou Chuang for purified His6-XPCNA and GST-human p27; Ethan Lee for the MBP-Δ90 cyclin B1 expression construct; Jason Spaeth for GST-Xic1(161–190) bacterial lysate; Todd Stukenberg for XTC cells and culture conditions; The San Antonio Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA54174 for Xic2 antibody production; Carlos R. Herrera for MBP-Δ90 Cyclin B protein; and Michael J. Parker and Carlos R. Herrera for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (RO1-GM066226) (PRY).
Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Department of Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio
Department of Infectious Diseases, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research
MD Anderson Cancer, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas
Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Biotechnology, Mail Code 8257, South Texas Research Facility, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Morgan DO: Principles of CDK regulation.Nature 1995, 374: 131–134. 10.1038/374131a0View ArticlePubMed
Sherr CJ, Roberts JM: Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases.Genes Dev 1995, 9: 1149–1163. 10.1101/gad.9.10.1149View ArticlePubMed
Waga S, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Stillman B: The p21 inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases controls DNA replication by interaction with PCNA [see comments].Nature 1994, 369: 574–578. 10.1038/369574a0View ArticlePubMed
Tsvetkov LM, Yeh KH, Lee SJ, Sun H, Zhang H: p27(Kip1) ubiquitination and degradation is regulated by the SCF(Skp2) complex through phosphorylated Thr187 in p27.Curr Biol 1999, 9: 661–664.View ArticlePubMed
Bornstein G, Bloom J, Sitry-Shevah D, Nakayama K, Pagano M, Hershko A: Role of the SCFSkp2 ubiquitin ligase in the degradation of p21Cip1 in S phase.J Biol Chem 2003, 278: 25752–25757. 10.1074/jbc.M301774200View ArticlePubMed
Kamura T, Hara T, Kotoshiba S, Yada M, Ishida N, Imaki H, Hatakeyama S, Nakayama K, Nakayama KI: Degradation of p57Kip2 mediated by SCFSkp2-dependent ubiquitylation.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100: 10231–10236. 10.1073/pnas.1831009100View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Sutterluty H, Chatelain E, Marti A, Wirbelauer C, Senften M, Muller U, Krek W: p45SKP2 promotes p27Kip1 degradation and induces S phase in quiescent cells.Nat Cell Biol 1999, 1: 207–214. 10.1038/12027View ArticlePubMed
Carrano AC, Eytan E, Hershko A, Pagano M: SKP2 is required for ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27.Nat Cell Biol 1999, 1: 193–199. 10.1038/12013View ArticlePubMed
Su JY, Rempel RE, Erikson E, Maller JL: Cloning and characterization of the Xenopus cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27XIC1.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92: 10187–10191. 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10187View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Shou W, Dunphy WG: Cell cycle control by Xenopus p28Kix1, a developmentally regulated inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases.Mol Biol Cell 1996, 7: 457–469.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Daniels M, Dhokia V, Richard-Parpaillon L, Ohnuma S: Identification of Xenopus cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p16Xic2 and p17Xic3.Gene 2004, 342: 41–47. 10.1016/j.gene.2004.07.038View ArticlePubMed
Ohnuma S, Philpott A, Wang K, Holt CE, Harris WA: p27Xic1, a Cdk inhibitor, promotes the determination of glial cells in Xenopus retina.Cell 1999, 99: 499–510. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81538-XView ArticlePubMed
Philpott A, Yew PR: The Xenopus cell cycle: an overview.Mol Biotechnol 2008, 39: 9–19. 10.1007/s12033-008-9033-zView ArticlePubMed
Vernon AE, Devine C, Philpott A: The cdk inhibitor p27Xic1 is required for differentiation of primary neurones in Xenopus.Development 2003, 130: 85–92. 10.1242/dev.00193View ArticlePubMed
Vernon AE, Movassagh M, Horan I, Wise H, Ohnuma S, Philpott A: Notch targets the Cdk inhibitor Xic1 to regulate differentiation but not the cell cycle in neurons.EMBO Rep 2006, 7: 643–648.PubMed CentralPubMed
Vernon AE, Philpott A: A single cdk inhibitor, p27Xic1, functions beyond cell cycle regulation to promote muscle differentiation in Xenopus.Development 2003, 130: 71–83. 10.1242/dev.00180View ArticlePubMed
Carruthers S, Mason J, Papalopulu N: Depletion of the cell-cycle inhibitor p27(Xic1) impairs neuronal differentiation and increases the number of ElrC(+) progenitor cells in Xenopus tropicalis.Mech Dev 2003, 120: 607–616. 10.1016/S0925-4773(03)00010-8View ArticlePubMed
Hardcastle Z, Papalopulu N: Distinct effects of XBF-1 in regulating the cell cycle inhibitor p27(XIC1) and imparting a neural fate.Development 2000, 127: 1303–1314.PubMed
Yew PR, Kirschner MW: Proteolysis and DNA replication: the CDC34 requirement in the Xenopus egg cell cycle.Science 1997, 277: 1672–1676. 10.1126/science.277.5332.1672View ArticlePubMed
Kim DH, Budhavarapu VN, Herrera CR, Nam HW, Kim YS, Yew PR: The CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin ligase mediates the proteolysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Xic1 through a direct association with PCNA.Mol Cell Biol 2010, 30: 4120–4133. 10.1128/MCB.01135-09View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Chuang LC, Yew PR: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen recruits cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Xic1 to DNA and couples its proteolysis to DNA polymerase switching.J Biol Chem 2005, 280: 35299–35309. 10.1074/jbc.M506429200View ArticlePubMed
Chuang LC, Zhu XN, Herrera CR, Tseng HM, Pfleger CM, Block K, Yew PR: The C-terminal domain of the Xenopus cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p27Xic1, is both necessary and sufficient for phosphorylation-independent proteolysis.J Biol Chem 2005, 280: 35290–35298. 10.1074/jbc.M506430200View ArticlePubMed
Chuang LC, Yew PR: Regulation of nuclear transport and degradation of the xenopus cyclin-dependent Kinase inhibitor, p27Xic1.J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 1610–1617. 10.1074/jbc.M008896200View ArticlePubMed
Lin HR, Chuang LC, Boix-Perales H, Philpott A, Yew PR: Ubiquitination of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, Xic1, is mediated by the Xenopus F-box protein xSkp2.Cell Cycle 2006, 5: 304–314. 10.4161/cc.5.3.2394View ArticlePubMed
Hershko A, Heller H: Occurrence of a polyubiquitin structure in ubiquitin-protein conjugates.Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1985, 128: 1079–1086. 10.1016/0006-291X(85)91050-2View ArticlePubMed
El-Deiry WS, Harper JW, O’Connor PM, Velculescu VE, Canman CE, Jackman J, Pietenpol JA, Burrell M, Hill DE, Wang Y: WAF1/CIP1 is induced in p53-mediated G1 arrest and apoptosis.Cancer Res 1994, 54: 1169–1174.PubMed
Gulbis JM, Kelman Z, Hurwitz J, O’Donnell M, Kuriyan J: Structure of the C-terminal region of p21(WAF1/CIP1) complexed with human PCNA.Cell 1996, 87: 297–306. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81347-1View ArticlePubMed
Warbrick E, Lane DP, Glover DM, Cox LS: A small peptide inhibitor of DNA replication defines the site of interaction between the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen.Curr Biol 1995, 5: 275–282. 10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00058-3View ArticlePubMed
Havens CG, Walter JC: Mechanism of CRL4Cdt2, a PCNA-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase.Genes Dev 2011, 25: 1568–1582. 10.1101/gad.2068611View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Abbas T, Dutta A: CRL4Cdt2: master coordinator of cell cycle progression and genome stability.Cell Cycle 2011, 10: 241–249. 10.4161/cc.10.2.14530View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Jackson PK, Chevalier S, Philippe M, Kirschner MW: Early events in DNA replication require cyclin E and are blocked by p21CIP1.J Cell Biol 1995, 130: 755–769. 10.1083/jcb.130.4.755View ArticlePubMed
Guo Z, Dunphy WG: Response of Xenopus Cds1 in cell-free extracts to DNA templates with double-stranded ends.Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11: 1535–1546.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Kornbluth S, Smythe C, Newport JW: In vitro cell cycle arrest induced by using artificial DNA templates.Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12: 3216–3223.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
Finkielstein CV, Lewellyn AL, Maller JL: The midblastula transition in Xenopus embryos activates multiple pathways to prevent apoptosis in response to DNA damage.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98: 1006–1011. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1006View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Havens CG, Walter JC: Docking of a specialized PIP Box onto chromatin-bound PCNA creates a degron for the ubiquitin ligase CRL4Cdt2.Mol Cell 2009, 35: 93–104. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.012View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Wei W, Ayad NG, Wan Y, Zhang GJ, Kirschner MW, Kaelin WG Jr: Degradation of the SCF component Skp2 in cell-cycle phase G1 by the anaphase-promoting complex.Nature 2004, 428: 194–198. 10.1038/nature02381View ArticlePubMed
Smythe C, Newport JW: Systems for the study of nuclear assembly, DNA replication, and nuclear breakdown in Xenopus laevis egg extracts.Methods Cell Biol 1991, 35: 449–468.View ArticlePubMed
Abbas T, Sivaprasad U, Terai K, Amador V, Pagano M, Dutta A: PCNA-dependent regulation of p21 ubiquitylation and degradation via the CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin ligase complex.Genes Dev 2008, 22: 2496–2506. 10.1101/gad.1676108View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
Kim Y, Starostina NG, Kipreos ET: The CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin ligase targets the degradation of p21Cip1 to control replication licensing.Genes Dev 2008, 22: 2507–2519. 10.1101/gad.1703708View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
McSherry TD, Mueller PR: Xenopus Cds1 is regulated by DNA-dependent protein kinase and ATR during the cell cycle checkpoint response to double-stranded DNA ends.Mol Cell Biol 2004, 24: 9968–9985. 10.1128/MCB.24.22.9968-9985.2004View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.