Skip to main content
Download PDF

NPRL2 is required for proliferation of oncogenic Ras-transformed bronchial epithelial cells

Cell Division volume 19, Article number: 22 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Nitrogen permease regulator-like 2 (NPRL2/TUSC4) is known to exert both tumor-suppressing and oncogenic effects in different types of cancers, suggesting that its actions are context dependent. Here, we delineated the molecular and functional effects of NPRL2 in malignantly transformed bronchial epithelial cells. To do so, we depleted NPRL2 in oncogenic HRas-transduced and malignantly transformed human bronchial epithelial (BEAS2B), Ras-AI-T2 cells. Intriguingly, depletion of NPRL2 in these cells induced activation of mTORC1 downstream signaling, inhibited autophagy, and impaired Ras-AI-T2 cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest that NPRL2 is required for oncogenic HRas-induced cell transformation. Depletion of NPRL2 increased levels of the DNA damage marker γH2AX, the cell cycle inhibitors p21 and p27, and the apoptosis marker cleaved-PARP. These NPRL2-depleted cells first accumulated at G1 and G2, and later exhibited signs of mitotic catastrophe, which implied that NPRL2 depletion may be detrimental to oncogenic HRas-transformed cells. Additionally, NPRL2 depletion reduced heat shock factor 1/heat shock element- and NRF2/antioxidant response element-directed luciferase reporter activities in Ras-AI-T2 cells, indicating that NPRL2 depletion led to the suppression of two key cytoprotective processes in oncogenic HRas-transformed cells. Overall, our data suggest that oncogenic HRas-transduced and malignantly transformed cells may depend on NPRL2 for survival and proliferation, and depletion of NPRL2 also induces a stressed state in these cells.

Introduction

Nitrogen permease regulator-like 2 (NPRL2, also known as tumor-suppressor candidate 4; TUSC4) is a requisite subunit of the conserved GAP activity toward Rags 1 (GATOR1) complex that inhibits mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) in response to amino acid insufficiency [1]. mTORC1 acts as a serine/threonine kinase to integrate upstream nutrient and growth factor signals with downstream transcriptional and translational apparatuses that control cellular biomass accumulation and metabolism. As such, mTORC1 plays major regulatory roles in fundamental cellular processes including energy utilization, protein synthesis, autophagy, cell growth and proliferation [2]. In light of its myriad functions, the mTOR pathway is widely considered to be a central regulator of cellular and physiological homeostasis, and dysregulation of mTOR signaling has been implicated in many cancers [3]. Since modulating the activity of TORC1 with GATOR1 can rapidly fine-tune the cellular metabolic state in response to environmental cues [4], these factors are able to coordinate cell growth/proliferation with environmental/physiological status.

Much work on NPRL2 has been conducted using Drosophila. In this model organism, NPRL2 is required for viability, and the lethality associated with the NPRL2-null mutation is due to the hyperactivation of TORC1 [5]. Furthermore, NPRL2 RNAi or a null mutation that fails to downregulate TORC1 in response to amino-acid limitation will trigger apoptosis in fly egg chambers [5, 6], implying that NPRL2 protects the cells during amino-acid starvation. However, in the escaper adults of NPRL2-null mutants, multiple cell types exhibit significantly increased sizes, suggesting that NPRL2 also constrains cell growth in some circumstances [5]. Along these lines, a loss-of-function NPRL2 mutation in flies was shown to increase TORC1 activity and induce a high rate of intestinal stem cell proliferation [7]. Genetic studies in yeast supported this idea, as mutants lacking NPRL2 exhibit unchecked growth under specific nutrient limitations [8]. Taken together, these studies reveal that NPRL2 inhibition of TORC1 may have different effects on cell proliferation in different cellular contexts and at different stages of cell development.

Loss of a genomic locus (3p21.3) containing NPRL2 and decreased NPRL2 expression are observed in many cancer cell lines and tumor tissues [9,10,11], suggesting that the protein may have tumor suppressive functions. However, the expression of NPRL2 is slightly and significantly increased in lung cancer tissues compared to macroscopically unchanged lung tissues surrounding the primary lesion [12], making it unclear whether NPRL2 consistently acts as a tumor suppressor. In addition, high expression of NPRL2 has been linked to poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer [13], and NPRL2 expression level is known to be upregulated in prostate cancer cell lines [14]. Importantly, NPRL2 overexpression was shown to promote proliferation and docetaxel chemoresistance of prostate cancer cells through a mechanism that involves inhibition of the mTOR pathway [15, 16]. Thus, the effects of NPRL2 expression on mTOR may be especially important for cell survival and cell proliferation in the context of various cancers.

mTORC1 integrates a variety of extracellular and intracellular signals to drive metabolic pathways that facilitate cell growth and proliferation, and aberrant hyperactivation of mTOR signaling has been observed in many solid tumors [17, 18]. For this reason, selective mTOR inhibitors are under evaluation in clinical trials on different cancers [19]. However, mTOR hyperactivation may also disrupt cellular homeostasis and induce cell death, likely by mechanisms involving increased ROS and oxidative stress [20, 21]. Thus, mTOR activity levels must be titrated in cancer cells such that the cell can meet the high energy demands of cell growth/proliferation without causing cell death. We hypothesized that NPRL2 may play an essential role in restraining mTORC1 activity in transformed cells to allow for survival and proliferation of the transformed cells. Oncogenic Ras is known to induce hyperactivation of mTOR pathway [22, 23], and inhibition of mTOR can reverse oncogenic Ras-induced epithelial neoplasia [24]. Thus, we chose to investigate the role of NPRL2 in oncogenic HRas-transduced and malignantly transformed bronchial epithelial cells. Our results show that depletion of NPRL2 suppresses oncogenic HRas-transformed cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo, likely by inducing cell cycle arrest and mitotic catastrophe and by suppressing cytoprotective stress responses. Therefore, NPRL2 appears to be required for survival and proliferation of the oncogenic HRas-transformed cells, and the cells may also depend on NPRL2 for transformation.

Results

Expression of NPRL2 is upregulated in lung tumor tissues

We evaluated the mRNA expression level of NPRL2 in lung and prostate tumors using data from the The Cancer Gemone Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) datasets. We used the UCSC Xena platform [25] to retrieve the NPRL2 gene expression RNA-sequencing data from TCGA and GTEx. When comparing TCGA-lung tumors and GTEx-normal lung tissues, we found that NPRL2 expression was significantly lower both in lung tumors and the adjacent normal tissues than in normal lung tissues (Fig. 1A, p < 0.001), suggesting that NPRL2 may play a tumor suppressive role in lung tumor development. However, we also found that the expression level of NPRL2 was significantly higher in lung tumors than in the adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1A, p < 0.001), suggesting NPRL2 function might be required in the malignantly transformed cells to somehow benefit their viability and/or further transformation. Similar trends of NPRL2 expression were also observed in prostate tumors and corresponding normal tissues (Fig. 1B, p < 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Expression of NPRL2 is upregulated in lung tumor tissues. The mRNA expression levels of NPRL2 gene were analyzed by RNA sequencing in lung (A) and prostate (B) tissues; data were retrieved from TCGA and GTEx databases using the UCSC Xena platform. Data are presented as individual points with median and interquartile ranges from (A) 288 normal lung tissues, 109 lung tumor adjacent normal tissues, and 1013 primary and recurrent lung tumors. B NPRL2 gene expression data are from 100 normal prostate tissues, 52 prostate tumor adjacent normal tissues, and 496 primary and recurrent prostate tumors. ***p < 0.001 according to Student’s t-test

Full size image

Depletion of NPRL2 activates mTORC1 downstream signaling and inhibits autophagy in Ras-transformed cells

We next wanted to understand the possible role NPRL2 might play in cancerous cells, particularly in those with high mTORC1 activities. Since oncogenic HRas transformation was reported to activate mTORC1 signaling [23, 26], we depleted NPRL2 in oncogenic HRas-transduced and malignantly transformed Ras-AI-T2 cells and measured mTOR downstream signaling and cell proliferation. In our experiments, the depletion efficiency of NPRL2 in Ras-AI-T2 cells was verified by qPCR (Fig. 2A) and immunoblotting (Fig. 2B, left). As previous studies reported that cells with NPRL2 depletion display increased mTORC1 downstream signaling irrespective of amino acid status [27, 28], we examined the effects of NPRL2 depletion in the presence of complete medium. Our results showed that the levels of phospho-Thr386 p70 S6 kinase (pT389-S6K) and phospho-T37/46-4EBP1 (pT37/46-4EBP1), two mTORC1 downstream signaling substrates, were significantly increased (Fig. 2B) in NPRL2-depleted Ras-AI-T2 cells compared to controls transduced with virions containing empty vector. Since activation of mTORC1 leads to inhibition of autophagy [29], the effects of NPRL2 depletion on autophagy markers were also assessed. Ras-AI-T2 cells depleted of NPRL2 had accumulation of LC3-II and SQSTM1/p62 (Fig. 2B, left). Since the simultaneous accumulation of these proteins indicates blockage of autophagy flux [30], we concluded that autophagy might be blocked in the NPRL2-depleted cells. To confirm this, the NPRL2-depelted cells were treated with chloroquine (CQ), an autophagy blocker. The results (Fig. 2B, right) showed that the control depleted cells treating with CQ accumulated elevated levels of SQSTM1/p62 and LC3-II as expected. However, the levels of SQSTM1/p62 and LC3-II in CQ-treated NPRL2-depleted cells did not further increased compared to those without CQ treatment (Fig. 2B, right). Since CQ did not further enhance NPRL2 depletion-induced p62 and LC3-II accumulation, that NPRL2 depletion may also blocked autophagy propagation. In addition, our immunofluorescence staining revealed that the number of cells with puncta stained positively for LC3 but not LAMP1 (Fig. 2C left, arrowheads) was significantly increased in the NPRL2-depleted cultures (Fig. 2C right). Since the puncta show no signal for the lysosome marker LAMP1, we can infer that NPRL2 depletion may disrupt fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. Overall, our results confirmed that NPRL2 is effectively depleted in Ras-AI-T2 cells and that its depletion induces mTORC1 activation and disrupts autophagy flux.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Depletion of NPRL2 activates mTORC1 downstream signaling and inhibits autophagy in oncogenic HRas-transformed cells. A The NPRL2 mRNA expression level in Ras-AI-T2 cells transduced with virions containing empty vector (pLKO.1) or shRNA-targeting NPRL2 (shNPRL2). Forty-eight hours after transduction (20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells), the level of NPRL2 was analyzed by qPCR. Data are the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. ***p < 0.001 according to Student’s t-test. B NPRL2 depletion activates mTORC1 and inhibits autophagy. Left, Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced with control or NPRL2 shRNA containing virion (20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells) for 48 h or 96 h. Then, immunoblotting analyses were performed to measure the levels of NPRL2, mTORC1 downstream substrates, and autophagy markers. Right, Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced as described above and treated with 50 μM chloroquine (CQ) for 96 h. Immunoblotting analyses were performed to measure the level of autophagy markers. C NPRL2 depletion increased the percentage of cells with puncta that were LC3-positive and LAMP1-negative. Left, representative images of control and NPRL2-depleted Ras-AI-T2 cells stained for LC3 (green) and LAMP1 (red). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. Arrowheads indicate the cells with puncta stained only for LC3 and not LAMP1. Right, the percentages of cells displaying puncta stained only for LC3 but not LAMP1. Results are the mean ± SD from at least 200 cells for each condition, as determined from three experiments. *p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test

Full size image

NPRL2 depletion impedes proliferation of oncogenic HRas-transformed cells

Next, we tracked the cell proliferation rate of Ras-AI-T2 cells depleted of NPRL2 in vitro and in vivo. As shown in Fig. 3A, the proliferation rate of cells transduced with virions containing NPRL2-targeting shRNAs (10 or 20 μL virus-containing medium/104 cells) was considerably less than the rate of proliferation for cells transduced with empty control virions. In addition, the colony forming abilities of NPRL2-depleted cells both in solid plates (Fig. 3B) and in soft agar (Fig. 3C) were also significantly decreased compared to cells transduced with empty control virions. We then evaluated cell proliferation in vivo by generating xenografted tumors in immunodeficient mice. In this experiment, proliferation was also significantly reduced by depleting NPRL2 in Ras-AI-T2 cells (Fig. 3D). Additionally, our results shown in Fig. 3E indicated that the NPRL2 depletion-induced inhibition of cell proliferation (Fig. 3E, left) and induction of apoptosis (Fig. 3E, right) could be considerably reduced by rapamycin, a mTORC1 inhibitor. This result implies that NPRL2 depletion-induced mTORC1 activation might cause cell death in Ras-transformed cells. Taken together, these experimental results indicated that NPRL2 depletion impairs proliferation of oncogenic Ras-transformed bronchial epithelial Ras-AI-T2 cells both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, the oncogenic Ras-transformed cells may depend on NPRL2 to restrain mTORC1 for proliferation and malignant transformation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

NPRL2 depletion impedes proliferation of the oncogenic HRas-transformed cells. A NPRL2 depletion reduces the proliferation of Ras-AI-T2 cells. Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced with control or NPRL2-targeting shRNA-containing virions (10 or 20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells) for 48 h. Then, the cells were replated, and the viable cell numbers were monitored for 96 h at 24-h intervals with trypan blue dye exclusion assay. Results are the mean ± SD from three experiments. ***p < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA. B, C NPRL2 depletion reduced colony formation ability of Ras-AI-T2 cells. Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced with control or NPRL2-targeting shRNA-containing virions (10 or 20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells) for 48 h. Then, the cells were subjected to colony formation (B) or soft agar colony formation (C) analyses. Results are the mean ± SD from at least three experiments. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test. D NPRL2 depletion reduces the ability of Ras-AI-T2 cells to form xenografted tumors. Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced with control or NPRL2-targeting shRNA-containing virions (10 or 20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells) for 48 h. Then, the cells were collected and used for xenograft tumor formation assays (3–4 mice in each group). Tumor volumes (upper panels) are shown for individual mice (points) and the mean for each group (line). ***p < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA. Body weights (mean ± SD) are shown in lower panels and did not differ between groups. E Rapamycin reduces NPRL2 depletion-induced cell death and apoptosis. Left, Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced with control or NPRL2-targeting shRNA-containing virions (20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells) for 48 h. Then, the cells were replated in the absence or presence of 20 nM rapamycin for 72 h, and the viable cell numbers were measured with trypan blue dye exclusion assay. Alternatively, the cells were subjected to flow cytometry analysis of annexin V-positive cells (right). Results are the mean ± SD from three experiments. **p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test

Full size image

NPRL2 depletion induces cell cycle arrest and mitotic catastrophe

To understand how NPRL2 depletion might hamper cell proliferation, Ras-AI-T2 cells depleted of NPRL2 were collected and analyzed for phospho-Ser138 histone H2AX (γH2AX; DNA damage marker), p21 Cip1 and p27 Kip1 (inhibitors of cell cycle progression), and cleaved PARP (cPARP; apoptosis marker) by immunoblotting. The results showed that after transduction for 48 h, γH2AX and the two inhibitors of cell cycle progression were significantly increased in NPRL2-depleted cells (Fig. 4A, left). After transduction for 72 h, cPARP was also significantly accumulated in NPRL2-depleted Ras-AI-T2 cell cultures (Fig. 4A, left). Addition of rapamycin, the inhibitor of mTOR, to the NPRL2-depleted cells could significantly reduce the accumulation of p27 Kip1, p21 Cip, and cPARP, indicating the involvement of mTOR in NPRL2 depletion-induced events. Cell cycle analysis revealed that NPRL2 depletion increased the proportions of G1 cells after 24–48 h shRNA transduction, and it increased the proportion of G2 cells after 72 h shRNA transduction, as compared to controls (Fig. 4B, upper). Addition of rapamycin to the NPRL2-depleted cells could reverse NPRL2 depletion-induced cell cycle arrest (Fig. 4B, lower). These results suggest that NPRL2 depletion may induce DNA damage, block cell cycle progression, and promote apoptotic cell death, and mTOR may be involved in these events. In addition, after transduction for 72 h, the NPRL2-depleted Ras-AI-T2 cells displayed multipolar or disorganized mitotic spindles when entering into mitotic stage (Fig. 5A). After transduction for 96 h, increased numbers of the NPRL2-depleted Ras-AI-T2 cells had multiple nuclei (Fig. 5B left) or micronuclei (Fig. 5B right), both of which are features of mitotic catastrophe. Based on these findings, we conclude that NPRL2 depletion in Ras-AI-T2 cells may inhibit cell proliferation by inducing DNA damage, cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death, which is associated with the induction of mitotic catastrophe.

Fig. 4
figure 4

NPRL2 depletion induces DNA damage and cell cycle arrest. A Left, NPRL2 depletion led to accumulation of a DNA damage marker, cell cycle inhibitors, and an apoptosis marker. Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced with control or NPRL2-targeting shRNA-containing virions (20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells) for 48, 72 and 96 h. Then, cell lysates were used for immunoblot analyses. Right, paramycin might decrease NPRL2 depletion-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced as described above and treated with 20 nM rapamycin (Rap.). The cells were then subjected to immunoblotting analyses. B NPRL2 depletion increased the percentages of cells in G1 and G2/M phases. Upper, After transduction for 48, 72 or 96 h, Ras-AI-T2 cells were collected and fixed for cell cycle analysis (lower). Alternatively, the transduced cells were treated with or without 20 nM rapamycin (Rap.) for 48 or 96 h and then collected for analysis of cell cycle distribution (lower). Results are the mean ± SD determined from three experiments. *p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

NPRL2 depletion may induce mitotic catastrophe. A Left, representative images of the mitotic spindles in cells with or without NPRL2 depletion. Seventy-two hours after transduction, Ras-AI-T2 cells were fixed and immunostained with anti-γ-tubulin (green) and anti-α-tubulin (red). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. Right, the percentages of cells displaying abnormal mitotic spindles. Results are the mean ± SD from at least 200 cells for each condition, as determined from three experiments. **p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test. B NPRL2 depletion increases the percentage of cells with multiple nuclei or micronuclei. Ras-AI-T2 cells that were transduced with control shRNA virions (pLKO.1) or depleted of NPRL2 (shNPRL2) for 96 h were used for detection and quantification of multiple nuclei (left) or micronuclei (right). The percentages (mean ± SD) of cells displaying multiple nuclei or micronuclei were determined using at least 500 cells from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test

Full size image

NPRL2 depletion diminishes heat shock and antioxidant responses in oncogenic HRas-transformed cells

Oncogenic Ras-transformed cells are known to exhibit elevated levels of reactive oxygen species [31] and proteotoxic stress [32, 33]. In order to survive the oxidative damage and proteomic instability, the cells need to maintain sufficient levels of antioxidants and activate stress response machineries. We thus examined whether NPRL2 depletion might affect the antioxidant response and the heat shock response by monitoring the activities of luciferase reporters under the control of the NRF2/ARE from NQO1 promoter and HSF1/HSE from HSPA1A promoter. ATO treatment (5 μM for 6 h) of the control virion-transduced cells served as a positive control for both reporters. The results showed that both the NRF2/ARE- (Fig. 6A) and HSF1/HSE-driven (Fig. 6B) luciferase activities were significantly reduced in Ras-AI-T2 cells depleted of NPRL2 compared to those receiving pLKO.1 control. Therefore, NPRL2 depletion appears to disrupt the cellular stress response pathways mediated by NRF2, a key transcription factor for counteracting oxidative stress [34], and HSF1, the master regulator of heat shock response [35].

Fig. 6
figure 6

NPRL2 depletion suppresses HSE- and ARE-directed luciferase reporter activities. Ras-AI-T2 cells that were stably transfected with the NRF2/ARE- (A) or HSF1/HSE- (B) luciferase reporters were transduced with control shRNA virions (pLKO.1) or depleted of NPRL2 (shNPRL2). At the indicated times, cells were collected and assayed for luciferase activities. Treatment of the control virion-transduced cells with ATO (5 μM for 6 h) was used as a positive control for both reporters. Results are mean ± SD as determined from three independent experiments. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t-test

Full size image

Discussion

mTORC hyperactivation frequently occurs in human tumors, suggesting it may be a valuable therapeutic target. However, mTOR inhibitors have performed poorly in clinical trials, with some even displaying the cytoprotective effects of reducing oxygen and glucose consumption [21]. Thus, mTOR activity levels appears to be carefully regulated in cancer cells such that the cell can maintain the high energy demands of cell growth/proliferation without causing cell death. It would be useful to understand how the mTOR signaling pathway functions in malignantly transformed cells. In the present study, we show that depletion of NPRL2, a negative regulator of mTORC1, inhibits the proliferation of the oncogenic HRas-transformed bronchial epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo, possibly by preventing mTOR persistent activation and inducing cell cycle arrest, mitotic catastrophe and cell death. Our findings indicate that NPRL2 is required for proliferation of oncogenic HRas-transformed cells and further imply that NPRL2 may function in Ras-transformed cells to restrict excessive mTORC1 activity and allow for cell survival and transformation.

NPRL2 dysregulation has been implicated in many human pathologies, including cancers. Nevertheless, its role in cancer development is controversial. For example, studies on the expression levels and roles of NPRL2 in lung tumors have produced unclear or conflicting results. Some studies have shown strong suppression of NPRL2 gene expression and promoter hypermethylation in lung tumors [36, 37]. It was also shown that transgenic NPRL2 expression suppresses lung cancer cell proliferation in vitro by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in vitro, and it attenuates tumor xenograft formation in mice [9]. In addition, NPRL2 gene expression level is inversely correlated with cisplatin sensitivity in lung cancer cell lines [10], and NPRL2 overexpression inhibits cell growth and enhances sensitivity to cisplatin in lung cancer cell lines [10, 38]. However, NPRL2 gene expression levels are unchanged or only have small changes in most lung tumor tissues studied [12, 39]. Epigenetic analyses have also failed to show NPRL2 gene promoter hypermethylation in lung tumor tissues [12]. Furthermore, some reports have shown that NPRL2 gene or protein expression is high in some lung cancer tissues or cell lines [10, 12, 37]. Together, these studies suggest that NPRL2 may play distinct roles in different histopathological subtypes, tumor stages, or patients with different characteristics. Thus, it is critical to understand the complex mechanisms by which NPRL2 might affect lung cancer development.

Accumulated evidence indicates that mTORC1 hyperactivation drives cellular senescence and/or quiescence, as inhibition of mTORC1 can delay or even reverse the onset of senescence [40, 41]. Our results show that depletion of NPRL2 activates mTORC1 downstream signaling and inhibits the proliferation of Ras-transformed cells, induces dramatic increases in the levels of γH2AX, upregulates cell cycle inhibitors p21 and p27, increases the proportions of G1 and G2 cells, and induces mitotic catastrophe. Therefore, cells with downregulated NPRL2 and activated mTORC1 might be expected to enter into a senescent (or quiescent) state, and we can conclude that NPRL2 is required for survival and proliferation of the transformed cells. In addition, our results showed that rapamycin, a mTORC1 inhibitor, could rescue NPRL2 depletion-induced cell death, indicating NPRL2 depletion-induced mTORC1 activation may cause cell death in oncogenic HRas-transformed cells. These conclusions are consistent with a previous report showing that NPRL2 expression is upregulated in prostate cancers and linked to poor prognosis [13] and another showing that NPRL2 depletion inhibits proliferation of prostate cancer cells [14]. In addition, NPRL2 was found to be significantly upregulated in docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer cells and associated with decreased mTOR signaling and elevated autophagy; depleting NPRL2 in these cells increases sensitivity to docetaxel by inducing apoptosis [16]. Our results also revealed that NPRL2 depletion activated mTOR downstream signaling, blocked autophagy, induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Along with these studies on prostate cancer, our study supports the idea that NPRL2 is required for cancer cell survival and proliferation in some contexts.

Modulation of mTOR activity has been studied in other contexts as well. For example, chronic activation of mTORC1 in NPRL2 knockout skeletal cells leads to compensatory increases in anaplerotic pathways to replenish TCA intermediates that are consumed for biosynthetic purposes [27]. Those results suggest that persistent mTORC1 hyperactivation may disrupt the homeostatic regulation of mitochondrial functions. Along these lines, primary human fibroblasts with hyperactivated mTOR are known to be deficient in mitophagy, which leads to accumulation of damaged mitochondria and consequent increases in oxidative stress [42]. Furthermore, mTORC1 activation in NPRL2 knockout murine embryonic fibroblasts causes impairments in amino acid metabolism and homeostasis [43]. Similarly, murine embryonic fibroblasts with deficiencies in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC; negative regulator of mTOR) have hyperactivated mTOR and are more susceptible to necrotic cell death [44]. Another report showed that deficiency of TSC in intestinal epithelial cells induces TUNEL-positive cell death [45]. These studies revealed that NPRL2 depletion and chronic activation of mTORC1 may disrupt cellular homeostasis and impair cell proliferation. Our results also showed that NPRL2 depletion-induced cell death could be rescued by inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin in oncogenic Ras-transformed cells. Thus, NPRL2 inhibition of mTORC1 in Ras-transformed cells may paly critical roles to support cell survival and proliferation.

Our experiments showed that NPRL2 depletion in Ras-AI-T2 cells reduced NRF2- and HSF1-directed luciferase reporter activities, suggesting that the antioxidant response and heat shock response were suppressed. These two cytoprotective processes allow cells to cope with stresses that might arise from excessive proliferation, as would occur in oncogenic Ras-transformed cells. Previous studies have shown that the mitogenic response of oncogenic Ras involves the production of reactive oxygen species [46,47,48]. By damaging cellular macromolecules, excessive levels of reactive oxygen species are highly detrimental to the cells, potentially causing cell cycle arrest, senescence or cell death [49]. To combat high levels of reactive oxygen species, the NRF2-mediated antioxidant response is upregulated in oncogenic Ras-transformed cells, and its disruption will impair cell proliferation and tumorigenesis [50]. Similarly, HSF1 can be activated by oncogenic Ras [51] and is required for oncogenic Ras-induced malignant cell transformation [32]. Thus, it is reasonable to expect that HSF1-mediated heat shock response may protect the transformed cells from excessive proliferation-induced proteotoxic stress inherent to malignant transformation. These studies imply that suppression of the NRF2-mediated antioxidant response and HSF1-mediated heat shock response by NPRL2 depletion may disrupt the cytoprotective mechanisms and allow damage to accumulate in the Ras-transformed cells, thus hampering the survival and proliferation of Ras-AI-T2 cells. In addition, mTORC1 has been shown to sense and negatively respond to oxidative and proteotoxic stresses as an adaptive strategy to support cell survival under stress conditions [52, 53]. In our study, NPRL2 depletion in Ras-AI-T2 cells may induce persistent activation of mTORC1, which may worsen cell sensitivity to oxidative stress and proteotoxicity that might be overly produced in the transformed cells.

In summary, our study demonstrates that NPRL2 is required for survival and proliferation of oncogenic HRas-transduced and malignantly transformed bronchial epithelial cells. Furthermore, our data imply that the malignantly transformed cells may depend on NPRL2 to restrict excessive mTORC1 activity, thereby promoting tumorigenic cell survival and proliferation.

Materials and methods

RNA-sequencing data acquisition from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases

The NPRL2 gene expression data from TCGA and GTEx-normal were retrieved using the UCSC Xena platform [25]. As these human data are from public online databases, an institutional approval is not required for the use of these data. RNA-sequencing data from 1013 primary and recurrent lung tumors and 109 adjacent normal lung tissues were retrieved from TCGA-lung cancers, while data from 288 normal lung tissues were obtained from GTEx. RNA-sequencing data from 496 primary and recurrent prostate tumors and 52 adjacent normal prostate tissues were also retrieved from TCGA-prostate cancers, while data from 100 normal prostate tissues were collected from GTEx.

Cell culture and chemicals

BEAS-2B cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, USA) and maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 mg/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin in an incubator with a fully humidified 10% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. The cells containing empty vector pFB-Neo or stably expressing FLAG-tagged HRasG12V were established as described [54]. Ras-AI-T2, a HRasG12V-transduced cell clone was considered to be malignantly transformed due to its abilities to undergo anchorage-independent growth and xenografted tumor formation. The effects of NPRL2 depletion on cell proliferation of Ras-AI-T2 (oncogenic HRas-transduced and malignantly transformed bronchial epithelial) cells were assessed in culture by trypan blue exclusion and annexin V binding apoptosis assays, colony formation assays, and soft agar colony formation assay. Cell proliferation was also evaluated in a xenograft mouse model.

Depletion of NPRL2 and qPCR

shRNAs targeting NPRL2 (gene symbol TUSC4, TRCN-38079 and 38083) were purchased from the National RNAi Core Facility (Genomic Research Center, Academia Sinica). The shRNA-containing virions were prepared, and depletion of endogenous NPRL2 was performed as described previously [55]. Empty vector pLKO.1-containing virions were also prepared and used as a control. Forty-eight hours after transduction, total RNA or cell lysates were collected, and the expression of NPRL2 gene and proteins were assessed by qPCR and immunoblotting. Total RNA was extracted from cells with Trizol (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. A 2.5 μg aliquot of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with the PrimeScriptII RT Enzyme kit (Takara Bio USA). Then, qPCR was performed with a Light Cycler 480 system (Roche, Penzberg, Germany). The amplification reaction was performed in a 20 μL mixture containing 10 μL 2 × SYBR Green mix, 1 μL cDNA, and 0.2 μM of each primer. The PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 10 s. Following amplification, the PCR products were examined via melting curve analyses. NPRL2 RNA levels were normalized to GAPDH mRNA, and each sample was analyzed in triplicate. mRNA levels were assessed by calculating 2−ΔΔCt values. The primer sets used were as follows: NPRL2, forward 5′-TGCACTCTGCCCATTGATGA-3′ and reverse 5′-AGGTACATCATACTCCTGGG; GAPDH, forward 5′-CTCCTCCACCTTTGACG-3′ and reverse 5′-ACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3′.

Immunoblotting

Cell lysis and immunoblotting were performed as described [55]. Proteins were detected using anti-NPRL2 (GTX54626, GeneTex, Taiwan), anti-phospho-Thr389-p70 S6 Kinase (#9205, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), anti-phospho-Thr37/46-4EBP1 (#2855, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p27 Kip1 (#3686, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p21 Cip1 (#2947, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-cleaved PARP (#5625, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-LC3B (#3868, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-SQSTM1/p62 (#5114, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-phospho-Ser139-Histone H2A.X (#9718, Cell Signaling Technology). PCNA and HSC70 served as loading controls and were detected with anti-PCNA (sc-56, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, TX, USA) and anti-HSC70 (sc-7298, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Cell proliferation and apoptosis assays

To evaluate the proliferative capacity of cells depleted of NPRL2, Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced with control or NPRL2 shRNA-containing virions (10 or 20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells). After 48 h, cells were replated, and the viability and proliferation rate were tracked by performing a trypan blue exclusion cell counting assay every 24 h for 4 days [56]. Apoptosis was detected as previously described [57] with annexin V-FITC/PI staining kit (BD Bioscience, New Jersey, USA).

Colony formation assay

Cells were transduced as described above. After 48 h, cells were trypsinized, counted, replated into 60-mm petri dishes, and cultured for 10 days to allow colony formation [58]. The assay was performed in triplicate for each sample. The colonies were then fixed with methanol, stained with 1% Giemsa, air-dried, and counted. Plating efficiency (PE) was calculated as the ratio of the number of colonies to the number of cells seeded; cells transduced with the control pLKO.1-containing virions were taken as 100%.

Soft agar colony formation assay

The virion transduction and cell replating procedures were the same as described for the colony formation assay, except that cells were first suspended in 0.3% agarose-containing medium and then spread onto an 0.6% agarose-containing medium underlay [59]. The assay was performed in triplicate for each sample. Every 7 days, approximately 200 μL of fresh media was added dropwise to each dish in order to keep the agar hydrated. The single cells were allowed to form colonies for 21 days. Colonies were fixed, stained and counted. Colonies were scored using a visual counting grid under a dissecting microscope. Relative colony number for each soft agar plate was obtained by normalizing the colony number in the plate to the PE in a solid plate.

Cell growth in xenograft mouse model

The design and study procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Academia Sinica (Protocol ID: 12-12-436). Male athymic nude mice (4–5 weeks old, with a bodyweight of 18–20 g) were obtained from the National Laboratory Animal Center (Taipei, Taiwan) and housed for 1 week in a pathogen-free animal facility before experimental manipulation. Ras-AI-T2 cells were transduced with virions containing empty vector (pLKO.1) or shRNA targeting NPRL2 (shNPRL2) at a density of either 10 or 20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells. After transduction for 48 h, the cells were collected, suspended in PBS (pH 7.4), and then immediately subjected to implantation. For implantations, an aliquot of Ras-AI-T2 cells (2 × 106 cells) suspended in 100 μL PBS was subcutaneously inoculated into the hind limb of a mouse. To monitor tumor growth, the longest and shortest diameters of the tumors were measured using calipers. Tumor volume (mm3) was calculated according to the following formula: tumor volume = (length × width2)/2. Mouse body weight was also measured as a general indicator of health.

Immunofluorescence staining and analysis of autophagy and spindle abnormalities

Cells were seeded on coverslips and then transduced with control or NPRL2-targeting shRNA-containing virions. After 72 h, the cells were fixed and subjected to immunofluorescence staining as previously described [55]. The primary antibodies included anti-LC3B (#3868, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-LAMP1 (#9091, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-α-tubulin (GeneTex or Sigma) and anti-γ-tubulin (Sigma). Alexa-Fluor 488- and 633-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). For analysis of autophagy abnormalities, the autophagosomes were immunostained for LC3 and LAMP1, as described above. Confocal imaging of the immunostained samples was performed using a Leica TCS-SP5 upright microscope. For each sample, the percentage of cells containing puncta were positively stained for LC3 but not LAMP1 was calculated. For analysis of mitotic spindle abnormalities, the mitotic spindle was revealed by immunostaining for α- and γ-tubulins, as described above. The numbers of cells with mitotic spindle abnormalities were counted under a Zeiss Axioplan 2 Imaging MOT fluorescence microscope. Multipolar spindles and disorganized spindles were regarded as mitotic spindle abnormalities. The level of spindle abnormalities is expressed as the percentage of the mitotic cells containing abnormal spindles.

Analysis of cell cycle distribution

Cell cycle progression was monitored using DNA flow cytometry as described [60]. DNA was stained with propidium iodide (PI), and the DNA contents of individual cells were analyzed using a fluorescence activated cell sorter (Attune NxT, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Invitrogen). The cell cycle distributions were determined using a computer program provided by Invitrogen.

Analysis of cells with multiple nuclei and micronuclei

Cells (1 × 104) were seeded on coverslips and transduced with the indicated volume of medium containing control or NPRL2-targeting shRNA virions. After 96 h, the cells were fixed with methanol and stained with 3% Giemsa (BDH, Bristol, UK). The coverslips were mounted, and cells were examined under an under a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope. Cells with multiple nuclei or micronuclei were identified and counted.

Luciferase reporter assays

Two luciferase reporter cell lines were established by G418 selection of Ras-AI-T2 cells stably expressing firefly luciferase reporter genes under the control of different promoters. HSPA1A-Luc was driven by the heat shock factor 1 binding heat shock element (HSF1/HSE) of HSPA1A [54], and NQO1-Luc was driven by the NRF2/antioxidant response element (ARE) of NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) [61]. After transduction with control virion or virion containing shRNA targeting NPRL2 (20 μL virion-containing medium/104 cells) for the indicated times, the luciferase reporter cells were collected and luciferase assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Bright-Glo assay system, Promega). Luciferase activities were normalized to the protein amount applied in each assay. Treatment of control virion-transduced cells with 5 μM arsenic trioxide (ATO) for 6 h was used as a positive control for both reporters.

Statistics

All statistical analyses are described in the figure legend and were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.12 software.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated or analyzed during this study are contained in this published article.

References

  1. Bar-Peled L, Chantranupong L, Cherniack AD, Chen WW, Ottina KA, Grabiner BC, et al. A tumor suppressor complex with GAP activity for the Rag GTPases that signal amino acid sufficiency to mTORC1. Science. 2013;340(6136):1100–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zoncu R, Efeyan A, Sabatini DM. mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12(1):21–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saxton RA, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 2017;168(6):960–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim J, Guan KL. mTOR as a central hub of nutrient signalling and cell growth. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(1):63–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei Y, Reveal B, Cai W, Lilly MA. The GATOR1 complex regulates metabolic homeostasis and the response to nutrient stress in Drosophila melanogaster. GBethesda. 2016;6(12):3859–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wei Y, Lilly MA. The TORC1 inhibitors Nprl2 and Nprl3 mediate an adaptive response to amino-acid starvation in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21(9):1460–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Xi J, Cai J, Cheng Y, Fu Y, Wei W, Zhang Z, et al. The TORC1 inhibitor Nprl2 protects age-related digestive function in Drosophila. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(21):9811–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu X, Tu BP. Selective regulation of autophagy by the Iml1-Npr2-Npr3 complex in the absence of nitrogen starvation. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(21):4124–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li J, Wang F, Haraldson K, Protopopov A, Duh F-M, Geil L, et al. Functional characterization of the candidate tumor suppressor gene NPRL2G21 located in 3p21.3C. Cancer Res. 2004;64(18):6438–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ueda K, Kawashima H, Ohtani S, Deng W-G, Ravoori M, Bankson J, et al. The 3p21.3 tumor suppressor NPRL2 plays an important role in cisplatin-induced resistance in human non–small-cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66(19):9682–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peng Y, Dai H, Wang E, Lin CC-J, Mo W, Peng G, et al. TUSC4 functions as a tumor suppressor by regulating BRCA1 stability. Cancer Res. 2015;75(2):378–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pastuszak-Lewandoska D, Kordiak J, Migdalska-Sęk M, Czarnecka KH, Antczak A, Górski P, et al. Quantitative analysis of mRNA expression levels and DNA methylation profiles of three neighboring genes: FUS1, NPRL2/G21 and RASSF1A in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Respir Res. 2015;16(1):76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Z, Luo S, Chen Y, Xie X, Du Z, Jiang L. High expression of NPRL2 is linked to poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer. Hum Pathol. 2018;76:141–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen X, Chen Z, Zheng B, Tang W. Targeting NPRL2 to enhance the efficacy of Olaparib in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;508(2):620–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Z, Jiang Q, Zhu P, Chen Y, Xie X, Du Z, et al. NPRL2 enhances autophagy and the resistance to Everolimus in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate. 2019;79(1):44–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Luo S, Shao L, Chen Z, Hu D, Jiang L, Tang W. NPRL2 promotes docetaxel chemoresistance in castration resistant prostate cancer cells by regulating autophagy through the mTOR pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2020;390(2): 111981.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu GY, Sabatini DM. mTOR at the nexus of nutrition, growth, ageing and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(4):183–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wood KC, Gutkind JS. Challenges and emerging opportunities for targeting mTOR in cancer. Cancer Res. 2022;82(21):3884–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ali ES, Mitra K, Akter S, Ramproshad S, Mondal B, Khan IN, et al. Recent advances and limitations of mTOR inhibitors in the treatment of cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22(1):284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wellen KE, Thompson CB. Cellular metabolic stress: considering how cells respond to nutrient excess. Mol Cell. 2010;40(2):323–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Thedieck K, Holzwarth B, Prentzell MT, Boehlke C, Kläsener K, Ruf S, et al. Inhibition of mTORC1 by astrin and stress granules prevents apoptosis in cancer cells. Cell. 2013;154(4):859–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Skeen JE, Bhaskar PT, Chen CC, Chen WS, Peng XD, Nogueira V, et al. Akt deficiency impairs normal cell proliferation and suppresses oncogenesis in a p53-independent and mTORC1-dependent manner. Cancer Cell. 2006;10(4):269–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kiessling MK, Curioni-Fontecedro A, Samaras P, Atrott K, Cosin-Roger J, Lang S, et al. Mutant HRAS as novel target for MEK and mTOR inhibitors. Oncotarget. 2015;6(39):42183–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wislez M, Spencer ML, Izzo JG, Juroske DM, Balhara K, Cody DD, et al. Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin reverses alveolar epithelial neoplasia induced by oncogenic K-ras. Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3226–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldman MJ, Craft B, Hastie M, Repečka K, McDade F, Kamath A, et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):675–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan FH, Bai Y, Saintigny P, Darido C. mTOR signalling in head and neck cancer: heads up. Cells. 2019;8(4):333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dutchak PA, Estill-Terpack SJ, Plec AA, Zhao X, Yang C, Chen J, et al. Loss of a negative regulator of mTORC1 induces aerobic glycolysis and altered fiber composition in skeletal muscle. Cell Rep. 2018;23(7):1907–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cai Y, Xu G, Wu F, Michelini F, Chan C, Qu X, et al. Genomic alterations in PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer result in mTORC1 activation and limit the sensitivity to PI3Kα inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2021;81(9):2470–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. King KE, Losier TT, Russell RC. Regulation of autophagy enzymes by nutrient signaling. Trends Biochem Sci. 2021;46(8):687–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang P, Mizushima N. LC3- and p62-based biochemical methods for the analysis of autophagy progression in mammalian cells. Methods. 2015;75:13–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu R, Li B, Qiu M. Elevated superoxide production by active H-ras enhances human lung WI-38VA-13 cell proliferation, migration and resistance to TNF-alpha. Oncogene. 2001;20(12):1486–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dai C, Whitesell L, Rogers AB, Lindquist S. Heat shock factor 1 is a powerful multifaceted modifier of carcinogenesis. Cell. 2007;130(6):1005–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. De Raedt T, Walton Z, Yecies JL, Li D, Chen Y, Malone CF, et al. Exploiting cancer cell vulnerabilities to develop a combination therapy for ras-driven tumors. Cancer Cell. 2011;20(3):400–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Bellezza I, Giambanco I, Minelli A, Donato R. Nrf2-Keap1 signaling in oxidative and reductive stress. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2018;1865(5):721–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kmiecik SW, Mayer MP. Molecular mechanisms of heat shock factor 1 regulation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2022;47(3):218–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lerman MI, Minna JD. The 630-kb lung cancer homozygous deletion region on human chromosome 3p21.3: identification and evaluation of the resident candidate tumor suppressor genes. The International Lung Cancer Chromosome 3p21.3 Tumor Suppressor Gene Consortium. Cancer Res. 2000;60(21):6116–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Senchenko VN, Anedchenko EA, Kondratieva TT, Krasnov GS, Dmitriev AA, Zabarovska VI, et al. Simultaneous down-regulation of tumor suppressor genes RBSP3/CTDSPL, NPRL2/G21 and RASSF1A in primary non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jayachandran G, Ueda K, Wang B, Roth JA, Ji L. NPRL2 sensitizes human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells to cisplatin treatment by regulating key components in the DNA repair pathway. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(8): e11994.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Dammann R, Li C, Yoon JH, Chin PL, Bates S, Pfeifer GP. Epigenetic inactivation of a RAS association domain family protein from the lung tumour suppressor locus 3p21.3. Nat Genet. 2000;25(3):315–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Saoudaoui S, Bernard M, Cardin GB, Malaquin N, Christopoulos A, Rodier F. mTOR as a senescence manipulation target: a forked road. Adv Cancer Res. 2021;150:335–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Blagosklonny MV. Cell senescence, rapamycin and hyperfunction theory of aging. Cell Cycle. 2022;21(14):1456–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Bordi M, Darji S, Sato Y, Mellén M, Berg MJ, Kumar A, et al. mTOR hyperactivation in Down Syndrome underlies deficits in autophagy induction, autophagosome formation, and mitophagy. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(8):563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Dutchak Paul A, Laxman S, Estill Sandi J, Wang C, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Regulation of hematopoiesis and methionine homeostasis by mTORC1 inhibitor NPRL2. Cell Rep. 2015;12(3):371–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Filipczak PT, Thomas C, Chen W, Salzman A, McDonald JD, Lin Y, et al. TSC2 deficiency unmasks a novel necrosis pathway that is suppressed by the RIP1/RIP3/MLKL signaling cascade. Cancer Res. 2016;76(24):7130–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Xie Y, Zhao Y, Shi L, Li W, Chen K, Li M, et al. Gut epithelial TSC1/mTOR controls RIPK3-dependent necroptosis in intestinal inflammation and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(4):2111–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang JQ, Li S, Domann FE, Buettner GR, Oberley LW. Superoxide generation in v-Ha-ras-transduced human keratinocyte HaCaT cells. Mol Carcinog. 1999;26(3):180–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chuang JI, Chang TY, Liu HS. Glutathione depletion-induced apoptosis of Ha-ras-transformed NIH3T3 cells can be prevented by melatonin. Oncogene. 2003;22(9):1349–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. DeNicola GM, Tuveson DA. RAS in cellular transformation and senescence. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(Suppl 1):211–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang Y, Qi H, Liu Y, Duan C, Liu X, Xia T, et al. The double-edged roles of ROS in cancer prevention and therapy. Theranostics. 2021;11(10):4839–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. DeNicola GM, Karreth FA, Humpton TJ, Gopinathan A, Wei C, Frese K, et al. Oncogene-induced Nrf2 transcription promotes ROS detoxification and tumorigenesis. Nature. 2011;475(7354):106–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Zamkova M, Khromova N, Kopnin BP, Kopnin P. Ras-induced ROS upregulation affecting cell proliferation is connected with cell type-specific alterations of HSF1/SESN3/p21Cip1/WAF1 pathways. Cell Cycle. 2013;12(5):826–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Aramburu J, Ortells MC, Tejedor S, Buxadé M, López-Rodríguez C. Transcriptional regulation of the stress response by mTOR. Sci Signal. 2014;7(332):re2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Su KH, Dai C. mTORC1 senses stresses: Coupling stress to proteostasis. Bioessays. 2017;39(5).

  54. Yih LH, Hsu NC, Kuo HH, Wu YC. Inhibition of the heat shock response by PI103 enhances the cytotoxicity of arsenic trioxide. Toxicol Sci. 2012;128(1):126–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Fang CT, Kuo HH, Pan TS, Yu FC, Yih LH. HSP70 regulates the function of mitotic centrosomes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(20):3949–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Fang CT, Kuo HH, Yuan CJ, Yao JS, Yih LH. Mdivi-1 induces spindle abnormalities and augments taxol cytotoxicity in MDA-MB-231 cells. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7(1):118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Yih LH, Hsueh SW, Luu WS, Chiu TH, Lee TC. Arsenite induces prominent mitotic arrest via inhibition of G2 checkpoint activation in CGL-2 cells. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26(1):53–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Franken NAP, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2315–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Du F, Zhao X, Fan D. Soft agar colony formation assay as a hallmark of carcinogenesis. Bio Protoc. 2017;7(12): e2351.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Wu YC, Yen WY, Ho HY, Su TL, Yih LH. Glyfoline induces mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis in cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(4):1017–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Harbottle JA, Petrie L, Ruhe M, Houssen WE, Jaspars M, Kolb AF. A cell-based assay system for activators of the environmental cell stress response. Anal Biochem. 2020;592: 113583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Core Facility of the Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, for assistance with confocal microscopy and flow cytometry.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Academia Sinica and the National Science and Technology Council (MOST111-2320-B-001-011-MY3), Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Jing-Yuan Chuang, Pei-Han Wang & Chih-Jou Su

  2. Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan

    Hsiao-Hui Kuo, Pei-Han Wang, Chih-Jou Su & Ling-Huei Yih

Authors
  1. Jing-Yuan Chuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hsiao-Hui Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pei-Han Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chih-Jou Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ling-Huei Yih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JYC supervised the work. HHK, PHW and CJS performed the experiments and analyzed the data. LHY contributed to the conception and design of the work, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling-Huei Yih.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chuang, JY., Kuo, HH., Wang, PH. et al. NPRL2 is required for proliferation of oncogenic Ras-transformed bronchial epithelial cells. Cell Div 19, 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13008-024-00126-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13008-024-00126-w

Keywords

Cell Division

ISSN: 1747-1028

Contact us