- Open Access
The loop-less tmCdc34 E2 mutant defective in polyubiquitination in vitro and in vivo supports yeast growth in a manner dependent on Ubp14 and Cka2
- Agnieszka Lass†1,
- Ross Cocklin†2,
- Kenneth M Scaglione1, 3,
- Michael Skowyra1, 4,
- Sergey Korolev1,
- Mark Goebl2Email author and
- Dorota Skowyra1Email author
© Lass et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 8 December 2010
- Accepted: 31 March 2011
- Published: 31 March 2011
The Erratum to this article has been published in Cell Division 2016 11:13
The S73/S97/loop motif is a hallmark of the Cdc34 family of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes that together with the SCF E3 ubiquitin ligases promote degradation of proteins involved in cell cycle and growth regulation. The inability of the loop-less Δ12Cdc34 mutant to support growth was linked to its inability to catalyze polyubiquitination. However, the loop-less t riple m utant (tm) Cdc34, which not only lacks the loop but also contains the S73K and S97D substitutions typical of the K73/D97/no loop motif present in other E2s, supports growth. Whether tmCdc34 supports growth despite defective polyubiquitination, or the S73K and S97D substitutions, directly or indirectly, correct the defect caused by the loop absence, are unknown.
tmCdc34 supports yeast viability with normal cell size and cell cycle profile despite producing fewer polyubiquitin conjugates in vivo and in vitro. The in vitro defect in Sic1 substrate polyubiquitination is similar to the defect observed in reactions with Δ12Cdc34 that cannot support growth. The synthesis of free polyubiquitin by tmCdc34 is activated only modestly and in a manner dependent on substrate recruitment to SCFCdc4. Phosphorylation of C-terminal serines in tmCdc34 by Cka2 kinase prevents the synthesis of free polyubiquitin chains, likely by promoting their attachment to substrate. Nevertheless, tm CDC34 yeast are sensitive to loss of the Ubp14 C-terminal ubiquitin hydrolase and DUBs other than Ubp14 inefficiently disassemble polyubiquitin chains produced in tm CDC34 yeast extracts, suggesting that the free chains, either synthesized de novo or recycled from substrates, have an altered structure.
The catalytic motif replacement compromises polyubiquitination activity of Cdc34 and alters its regulation in vitro and in vivo, but either motif can support Cdc34 function in yeast viability. Robust polyubiquitination mediated by the S73/S97/loop motif is thus not necessary for Cdc34 role in yeast viability, at least under typical laboratory conditions.
- Sic1 Substrate
- Polyubiquitin Chain
- Ubiquitin Conjugate
- Loop Motif
- Motif Replacement
The covalent attachment of ubiquitin to other proteins often serves as the signal for their degradation by the 26 S proteasome . Protein ubiquitination depends on a cascade of ubiquitin transfer reactions that begins with the formation of a high-energy thiolester between the C-terminus of ubiquitin and the catalytic site cysteine of the E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme. The activated ubiquitin is transesterified to the active site cysteine of one of many E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and then conjugated to specific substrates in a manner dependent upon specific E3 ubiquitin ligases. While the term "ubiquitin ligase" implies that all E3s are enzymes, only the HECT-type E3s contain a catalytic site cysteine that directly participates in the ubiquitin transfer. The RING-type E3s promote ubiquitination of specific substrates by the catalytic site of an E2. The significance of this difference is unclear, as both types of ubiquitin transfer cascades lead to formation of an isopeptide bond between the C-terminus of ubiquitin and a lysine residue on the substrate. Protein substrates can be modified with one or multiple ubiquitins and a chain of polyubiquitin can be synthesized when a lysine of ubiquitin serves as the isopeptide bond acceptor. A chain involving lysine 48 (K48) of ubiquitin and composed of at least 4 ubiquitins serves as the primary signal for substrate proteolysis [2, 3].
The RING-type SCF E3s are the largest and arguably most extensively studied family of ubiquitin ligases, with members present in all eukaryotes . The discovery of the SCF E3s was initiated by the observation that the S. cerevisiae CDC34 gene encodes an E2  that together with the Cdc53, Skp1 and Cdc4 cell cycle regulatory proteins promote degradation of the Sic1 S-phase cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, thereby permitting entry into S phase [6, 7]. A subsequent biochemical reconstruction [8–11] showed that S kp1, C dc53, Rbx1 and Cdc4, an F-box protein, form the SCFCdc4 E3 complex. The large number of F-box proteins with different C-terminal protein-protein interaction motifs enables the family of SCF E3s to recruit many substrates for ubiquitination by Cdc34, usually in response to substrate phosphorylation.
Of the eleven E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in S. cerevisiae, only Cdc34 functions with SCF E3s in vivo. This specificity is attributed to the unique C-terminus of Cdc34 that includes a domain necessary for binding to SCF [12–14], because Cdc34 mutants that lack this C-terminal domain cannot support yeast viability and a fusion protein containing this domain and the catalytic core of Rad6 can replace Cdc34 function in vivo. Based on this evidence it has been proposed that the catalytic cores of the E2s are interchangeable [15, 16].
We show that replacement of the catalytic motif compromises polyubiquitination activity of Cdc34 and alters its regulation in vitro and in vivo. Nevertheless, either motif can support Cdc34 function in cell growth and division, with normal cell size and cell cycle profile. These findings suggest that robust polyubiquitination catalyzed in a manner dependent on the S73/S97/loop motif is not necessary for Cdc34 function in vivo, at least under typical laboratory conditions. The S73/S97/loop motif conservation could be associated with a yet unappreciated role of Cdc34, possibly under conditions of stress and/or compromised growth.
Isogenic CDC34 and tm CDC34 yeast strains have similar growth properties, cell size and cell cycle profiles under typical laboratory conditions
Due to an essential role of Cdc34 in cell division , mutations that compromise Cdc34 function in vivo lead to cell cycle arrest. Monitoring growth and cell cycle phenotype is thus a common approach to assess the role of Cdc34 residues and/or motifs.
Previous analysis of growth phenotypes suggested that the t riple m utant tmCdc34 in which the S73/S97/loop motif conserved among the Cdc34-like E2s is replaced with the K73/D97/no loop motif typical for other E2s (Figure 1A-D) supports yeast growth. This conclusion was based on complementation of the cdc34-2 t emperature s ensitive (ts) and cdc34 Δ mutant yeast by over-expressed ch imeric ch CDC34/RAD6  or t riple m utant tm CDC34 ; an approach that could mask a functional defect due to overproduction of the complementing protein. However, we obtain similar results when cdc34-2 ts yeast express the tm CDC34 allele from the GAL1 promoter under non-inducing conditions thereby ensuring only low level expression (Figure 1E). In contrast, growth is not supported by S97D CDC34 that carries only the S97D replacement, or by Δ12 CDC34 that lacks the loop alone. Disruption of the S73/S97/loop motif in Cdc34, but not its replacement with the alternative E2 core motif is thus lethal for yeast.
These findings verify that tmCdc34 protein supports yeast growth despite lacking the catalytic core elements conserved among the Cdc34-like E2s. However, the steady-state level of tmCdc34 protein in yeast extracts is approximately 4-fold higher than the level of Cdc34 (Figure 2E) even when extracts are prepared by boiling cells directly in SDS-PAGE loading buffer (data not shown). Since the increased steady-state level of tmCdc34 is seen in a strain isogenic to the CDC34 strain, the difference is likely due to a difference in post-translational regulation associated specifically with the replacement of the catalytic E2 motif.
Purified tmCdc34 forms an ubiquitin-thiolester and monoubiquitinates substrates, but is defective in substrate polyubiquitination
To address how tmCdc34 functions without the catalytic core elements conserved among the Cdc34-like E2s, we compared the various activities of purified tmCdc34 to the activities of wild type Cdc34 and loop-less Δ12Cdc34. The comparison of Cdc34 and tmCdc34 was done with full-length proteins, but the comparison of all three catalytic cores (wt, tm, Δ12) could be performed only with Cdc34 proteins terminated at residue 244 (Figure 1D) because full-length Δ12Cdc34 is insoluble (this work). The previous characterization of Δ12Cdc34 was also done with a C-terminally truncated mutant (Δ12Cdc34270) . Ectopic expression of Cdc34244 rescues growth of cdc34Δ yeast [15, 16, 27] and supports yeast viability when expressed from the chromosomal location of CDC34 , demonstrating that the C-terminally truncated form of Cdc34 is functional, at least in the context of the wild type E2 core. All Cdc34 proteins used in this study elute as monomers in gel filtration chromatography (data not shown).
We next tested the ability of full-length Cdc34 and tmCdc34 to autoubiquitinate one of their C-terminal lysines (Figure 1D). This reaction is inefficient and it is catalyzed only in the absence of SCF . However, due to the intra-molecular nature , autoubiquitination provides unique insight into the intrinsic function of Cdc34. We find that autoubiquitination of full-length tmCdc34 is compromised (Figure 3B, α-Cdc34, compare lanes 6-9 and 1-5). The lack of high molecular weight species in reactions with wild type ubiquitin is consistent with a defect in polyubiquitination of monoubiquitinated tmCdc34, as it resembles the pattern observed with methylated ubiquitin that cannot be incorporated into polyubiquitin (Figure 3B, α-Cdc34, compare lanes 6-9, 11-14, and 15-18). However, longer reaction times are also needed to detect monoubiquitinated tmCdc34 in amounts similar to Cdc34 (Figure 3B, α-Cdc34, lanes 11-14 and 15-18). Furthermore, the intra-molecular nature of autoubiquitination  does not allow this assay to discriminate between catalytic defects or a change in the intra-molecular contacts between the E2 C-terminus and the E2 core. The altered pattern of autoubiquitination nevertheless provides evidence of a profound intrinsic (independent of SCF) difference between the activities of tmCdc34 and Cdc34.
We next sought to analyze the activity of tmCdc34 in the presence of SCF E3. We obtained similar results with full-length tmCdc34 and C-terminally truncated tmCdc34244. However, only in experiments with C-terminally truncated proteins terminated at residue 244 could we compare the activities of tmCdc34 and Cdc34 to the activity of Δ12Cdc34 due to the poor solubility of full-length Δ12Cdc34. In SCFCdc4-dependent assays with tmCdc34244, high molecular weight species of the Sic1 substrate (indicative of its polyubiquitination; Sic1-Ubn) are visualized via western blot with α-Sic1 antibodies only after long incubation times, exceeding by at least 12-fold (> 60 vs. 5 min) the time necessary to detect Sic1 modified by Cdc34244 (Figure 3C, lanes 5-8, 1-4). tmCdc34244 is as defective as Δ12Cdc34244 in the formation of high molecular weight Sic1 species and both mutant E2s catalyze a similar accumulation of Sic1 monoubiquitinated on one (Sic1-Ub1) or two (Sic1-Ub2) lysines (Figure 3C, lanes 5-8, 9-12 and data not shown). Monoubiquitination of additional lysines on Sic1 can be observed in the presence of high Cdc34 concentrations (1-3 μM; [8, 9, 29, 30]) that exceed by about 10-fold the estimated concentration of Cdc34 in cells . We also tested polyubiquitination of FMet4, the SCFMet30-dependent substrate modified on a single lysine residue K163 in vivo  and in vitro . Western blot with α-Flag antibodies visualizes polyubiquitinated forms of FMet4 after 5 minutes of reaction with Cdc34244, but 30 minutes are needed for similar polyubiquitination by tmCdc34244, suggesting a rate at least 6-fold slower (Figure 3D; α-FMet4, lanes 1-5 and 6-10, FMet4-Ubn). In contrast, western blot with α-Flag antibodies does not detect polyubiquitinated FMet4 even after 60 minutes of incubation with Δ12Cdc34244 (Figure 3D; α-FMet4, lanes 11-15, FMet4-Ubn), suggesting that Δ12Cdc34244 is less active than tmCdc34244. This difference reflects a difference in the synthesis of polyubiquitin chain on monoubiquitinated FMet4, as monoubiquitinated FMet4 appears with a similar rate in reactions with tmCdc34244 and Δ12Cdc34244 (Figure 3E; due to similarities of the apparent molecular weights, unubiquitinated and monoubiquitinated forms of FMet4 are detectable as separate species only under short western blot exposure times). This observation agrees with the finding that deletion of the loop does not affect substrate monoubiquitination by Cdc34 .
In summary, tmCdc34 is normally charged with ubiquitin thiolester and monoubiquitinates substrates in a manner similar to wild type Cdc34 and Δ12Cdc34. However, either the loop deletion or the motif replacement compromises substrate polyubiquitination by Cdc34.
Unlike in reactions with Cdc34, SCFCdc4 stimulates the synthesis of free polyubiquitin chains by tmCdc34 only modestly and in a manner dependent on substrate recruitment
We next addressed how the defect in substrate polyubiquitination by tmCdc34 relates to the synthesis of free polyubiquitin chains in vitro. The in vitro synthesis of free polyubiquitin chains by wild type Cdc34 is an acknowledged aspect of its function [18, 21, 34–36].
In contrast, SCFCdc4 stimulates the synthesis of free polyubiquitin by tmCdc34 only modestly and in a manner dependent on the Sic1 substrate (Figure 4A, α-Ub WB, compare lane 7 and 8). The ubiquitin conjugates detectable with α-Ub antibodies in reactions with tmCdc34 likely represent free polyubiquitin chains, because the same α-Ub western blot conditions prevent detection of substrate-attached polyubiquitin chains in reactions even with the more active Cdc34 (described above). We did not verify that the high molecular weight ubiquitin conjugates visualized by α-Ub western blot in tmCdc34-dependent reactions are sensitive to IsoT, because the necessity for additional dilution in preparation for IsoT treatment (see Methods) prevents their detection.
In summary, Cdc34 synthesizes super-stoichiometric amounts of free polyubiquitin in the presence of SCFCdc4 and substrate recruitment is sufficient to prevent this process. This regulatory mechanism is disrupted in reactions with tmCdc34, which synthesizes fewer free polyubiquitin chains and in a manner dependent on, not attenuated by, substrate recruitment.
tm CDC34 cells have fewer polyubiquitin conjugates in vivo, but their disassembly depends on the Ubp14 C-terminal ubiquitin hydrolase
To test whether tmCdc34 protein is defective in ubiquitin conjugation in vivo, we first performed western blot analysis with α-ubiquitin antibodies of whole cell extracts prepared by direct boiling of tm CDC34 cells in SDS-PAGE loading buffer. This procedure leads to rapid denaturation of proteins, including proteasome and ubiquitin proteases, and is therefore likely to extract intact ubiquitin conjugates. In these experiments, tm CDC34 cells have fewer ubiquitin conjugates of a broad molecular weight than CDC34 cells (Figure 4C, 10% PAGE, lanes 1 and 2; Ub4-Ubn). This difference is not accompanied by an accumulation of short polyubiquitin chains and the levels of ubiquitin are similar in both extracts (Figure 4C, 18% PAGE, lanes 1 and 2; Ub2-4; Ub1). The control western blot performed with α-Rpn10 antibodies verifies that equal amounts of total proteins were analyzed (Figure 4C, α-Rpn10). A reduction in ubiquitin conjugates but not ubiquitin levels is thus detected by analysis of the total ubiquitin conjugates in tm CDC34 yeast.
The patterns of ubiquitin conjugates detectable in CDC34 and, to a lesser degree, in tm CDC34 cells are similar and involve species of various molecular weights (Figure 4C, 10% PAGE, lanes 1 and 2; Ub4-Ubn). To assess whether these species represent ubiquitin conjugated to substrates or free polyubiquitin, we sought to test how their pattern changes upon deletion of the UBP14 gene, which encodes the only yeast ubiquitin hydrolase that disassembles polyubiquitin in a manner dependent on the free C-terminus [37, 38]. In the absence of UBP14, free polyubiquitin species would be expected to accumulate in the form of short chains composed of 2-6 ubiquitins, as only longer chains are efficiently disassembled by other DUBs, while the pattern of ubiquitin conjugated to substrates should not change unless the levels of free ubiquitin drop . The high molecular weight ubiquitin conjugates (Ubn) detectable in extracts prepared from CDC34 yeast are poorly detectable in extracts prepared from CDC34 upb14Δ yeast (Figure 4C, 10% SDS-PAGE, Ubn, lanes 1 and 3). The loss of ubiquitin conjugates correlates with an appearance of short Ub2-6 chains but not a change in ubiquitin level (Figure 4C, 18% SDS-PAGE, Ub2-6, Ub1, lanes 1 and 3). Free polyubiquitin chains thus represent a prominent fraction of the total ubiquitin conjugates in wild type yeast, at least during vigorous growth. A more accurate estimation is not possible based on these data alone, because western blot detection is not quantitative and the available α-ubiquitin antibodies have different affinities to short and long polyubiquitin chains.
If a significant fraction of the total ubiquitin conjugates detectable in CDC34 yeast extracts are free polyubiquitin chains, the lower level of similarly sized ubiquitin conjugates in tm CDC34 yeast (Figure 4C, 10% SDS-PAGE, lanes 1 and 2) could indicate that tm CDC34 yeast have fewer free polyubiquitin chains of similar lengths. In this case, fewer short Ub2-6 conjugates should be detectable in tm CDC34 cells lacking UPB14. Unexpectedly, this simple prediction could not be tested, because unlike wild type yeast, which are viable in the absence of UBP14, the tm CDC34 ubp14Δ double mutant yeast are inviable (Figure 4D, tm CDC34 upb14Δ and CDC34 upb14Δ). This lethality is corrected by ectopic expression of Ubp14 but not an inactive Ubp14 C354A mutant (Figure 4E), verifying the requirement for Ubp14 function. Thus, tm CDC34 cells have fewer polyubiquitin conjugates in vivo, but these conjugates can be disassembled only by Ubp14.
To get an insight into the Ubp14 dependence, we prepared cell extracts in a manner retaining activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (Methods). This procedure is more time consuming than extraction by cell boiling and does not include protease inhibitors. The extracts therefore do not retain the ubiquitin conjugates that were present in cells prior to lysis, leading to similarly low backgrounds in the isogenic CDC34 and tm CDC34 yeast, and in the isogenic UBP14 and ubp14Δ yeast (data not shown). Instead of inhibiting DUBs, we then attempted to overwhelm their activity by supplementing the extracts with purified Uba1, Ub, ATP and MgCl2, which should maximize the ubiquitin conjugation activities of E2s and E3s in the extracts. As expected, the supplementing components alone are insufficient to conjugate ubiquitin (Figure 4F, α-Ub, lanes 5, 10, 15, 20), but stimulate an accumulation of similar amounts of ubiquitin conjugates in the control extracts prepared from CDC34 yeast, or the isogenic UBP14 or ubp14Δ yeast (Figure 4F, 10% PAGE, α-Ub, lanes 1-5, 11-15 and 16-20). We have thus created conditions under which the lack of Ubp14 activity plays no major role in the accumulation of high molecular weight ubiquitin conjugates. Under these conditions, more of high molecular weight ubiquitin conjugates accumulate in tm CDC34 yeast extract (Figure 4F, α-Ub WB, 10% PAGE, Ubn, lanes 1-5, 6-10, 11-15 and 16-20). This effect is repetitive and the control western blot with α-Rpn10 antibodies verifies that equal amounts of total proteins were analyzed (Figure 4F, α-Rpn10).
It cannot be excluded that the 4-fold higher levels of tmCdc34 protein (Figure 2E) plays a role in the abnormal accumulation of high molecular weight ubiquitin conjugates in tm CDC34 yeast extract. However, this interpretation would be inconsistent with the defective function of tmCdc34 in vivo (Figure 4C, lanes 1, 2). A more likely explanation is that the polyubiquitin conjugates accumulate due to a delay in their disassembly by DUBs other than Ubp14. If a similar delay characterizes the polyubiquitin conjugates synthesized in tm CDC34 cells, their disassembly could be primarily dependent on C-terminal hydrolysis, explaining the essential role of Ubp14.
Phosphorylation of C-terminal serines in tmCdc34 by Cka2 kinase eliminates the synthesis of free polyubiquitin chains, likely by stimulating their attachment to substrate
Deletion of the C-terminus (Figure 5B, lanes 1-4), or replacement of the six C-terminal serines with alanines (Figure 5B, 6SA; lanes 5-10) prevents phosphorylation of Cdc34 by GstCka1. Extended autoradiogram exposure times are required to detect phosphorylation of the Cdc346SA mutant and this level of phosphorylation is comparable to the control phosphorylation of BSA (Figure 5B, lanes 5-10, 4 and 17 days). Only the six most C-terminal serines are thus phosphorylated within full length Cdc34. Charging Cdc34 with an ubiquitin thiolester under conditions that prevent discharge also does not trigger phosphorylation of the E2 core (data not shown).
Similarly, GstCka2 phosphorylates the six most C-terminal serines in Cdc34 (data not shown), or the two most C-terminal serines S207 and S216 in Cdc34244 over a range of concentrations Figure 5C, lanes 1-8). GstCka2 phosphorylates Cdc34244 and tmCdc34244 with similar kinetics (Figure 5C, lanes 9-16), suggesting that the phosphorylation is not affected by the motif replacement. We do not observe phosphorylation of the control Rad6 E2 even under conditions of 50-fold greater sensitivity of [32P] detection (Figure 5C, lane 21), verifying that GstCka2 function is specific to Cdc34. Only under conditions of such sensitivity, we could detect a low level of phosphorylation of Cdc34244 or tmCdc34244 carrying the S207A and S216A substitutions (Figure 5C, 43 h, lanes 18, 20). This signal represents ~1% of that associated with phosphorylation of S207 and S216 (Figure 5C, lanes 17, 19 and graph), does not account for quantitative phosphorylation of any other two serines, and was not observed with full-length Cdc346SA protein (Figure 5B, lanes 5-10).
The stimulation of Sic1 substrate polyubiquitination by GstCka2 correlates with a loss of free polyubiquitin chains in the same reaction mixtures (Figure 6A, α-Ub WB, compare lanes 3 and 7, arrows; see Figure 4A and 4B for verification that under the conditions used α-Ub western blot visualizes only free polyubiquitin chains). Phosphorylation of C-terminal serines in tmCdc34 thus may eliminate the synthesis of free polyubiquitin chains by promoting their attachment to substrate. To assess which of these effects plays a role in vivo, we tested whether overexpression of the Ubp14 C-terminal hydrolase rescues viability of tm CDC34 cka2Δ yeast. Overexpression of Ubp14 or its catalytically inactive mutant does not support growth of tm CDC34 cka2Δ yeast (Figure 6B), suggesting that the requirement for Cka2 function is not associated with its role in preventing the free polyubiquitin chain synthesis. Rather, it reflects the role in the stimulation of substrate polyubiquitination.
In control reactions with wild type Cdc34, GstCka2 has no effect on the SCFCdc4-dependent polyubiquitination of Sic1 substrate (Figure 6A, α−Sic1 WB, compare lanes 9-11 and 13-15). However, GstCka2 prevents the synthesis of free polyubiquitin chains in substrate-free reactions with SCFCdc4 (Figure 6A, α-Ub WB, lanes 12 and 16, green arrows). This effect is detectable only in substrate-free reactions, excluding the possibility that it results from redirecting the synthesis of polyubiquitin chains to substrate. Rather, it reflects a mechanism aimed at inhibiting the unproductive ubiquitin conjugation to free polyubiquitin chains typical of Cdc34 function with substrate-free SCFs. Under conditions of in vitro assays performed with low concentration of ubiquitin, or with an access of SCFCdc4 over substrate, this regulatory effect could indirectly promote substrate polyubiquitination by preventing rapid depletion of free ubiquitin. These possibilities could explain why under some experimental conditions the phosphorylation of wild type Cdc34 could stimulate Sic1 polyubiquitination .
Robust polyubiquitination activity is thought to be key to the function of the Cdc34 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme that, together with the SCF ubiquitin ligases, promotes degradation of proteins involved in cell cycle and growth regulation. However, we find that the tmCdc34 protein in which the S73/S97/loop motif is replaced with the K73/D97/no loop motif typical of other E2s supports yeast growth with normal cell size and cell cycle profile despite producing fewer polyubiquitin conjugates in vitro and in vivo. The significance of this finding comes from the observation that the in vitro defect in Sic1 substrate polyubiquitination by tmCdc34 is similar to the defect of Δ12Cdc34 protein that cannot support growth, and that tm CDC34 yeast contain fewer polyubiquitin conjugates in vivo than CDC34 yeast, despite 4-fold higher steady-state levels of tmCdc34 protein. While several cofactors are implicated in the function of tmCdc34 in vivo , these cofactors thus do not ensure normal ubiquitin conjugation in tm CDC34 yeast.
The observation that the catalytic E2 core motifs define distinct mechanisms of function and regulation is consistent with their conservation. However, their analysis in the context of a single E2 that collaborates with only one class of E3s provides the first direct evidence that the E2 motifs control the robustness and regulation of polyubiquitination. What predictions could be made based on this finding for the role and regulation of other E2s? The most obvious prediction is that the alternative motif would support well the function of the E2s that catalyze monoubiquitination, a process that is not related to protein degradation but yet regulates several aspects of cell biology, including endocytosis , chromatin remodeling  and DNA damage response [44, 45]. An example of such an E2 is Rad6, which monoubiquitinates histones and PCNA. The second prediction is that the alternative motif has the potential to support not only monoubiquitination, but also polyubiquitination, at least in reactions with some E3 partners. However, the mechanism of polyubiquitination catalyzed in a manner dependent on each motif would be different. In support of this possibility, two major self-oligomerization schemes linked to an activation of polyubiquitination emerge from analyses of the E2s that differ in their motifs. The Cdc34/Ubc7-like Ube2g2 E2 self-oligomerizes via a RING-independent interaction with its gp78 E3 partner . In contrast, the Ubc5-like E2s, which carry the K73/D97/no loop motif, self-oligomerize in a way dependent on the RING domain and non-covalent binding between ubiquitin and several residues located opposite the active site [47–50]. Finally, Cdc34 has a high preference for lysine K48 that is independent of its SCF E3 partner [51–53], but other E2s have lower intrinsic fidelity in lysine selection and frequently collaborate with E3s that define the lysine specificity [53, 54]. The low intrinsic fidelity in lysine selection could thus be an evolutionary adaptation that is associated with the K73/D97/no loop motif and that allows the synthesis of different linkages depending on the E3 context. In this view, the alternative motif could have evolved to provide a basis for the diversity of polyubiquitin linkages and signaling, while the original motif would have been selected based on the robustness of K48-type of polyubiquitination.
If the motif replacement in Cdc34 lowers the fidelity of lysine selection during polyubiquitin chain synthesis and SCFCdc4 did not evolve to correct for this change, then polyubiquitin chains synthesized by tmCdc34 could have altered and/or branched linkages instead of, or in addition to, the K48 type of polyubiquitin typical for Cdc34. This model could explain why tm CDC34 yeast are sensitive to loss of Ubp14, which is the only DUB that cleaves polyubiquitin in a manner independent of the Ub-Ub linkage [55, 56], and why DUBs other than Ubp14 disassemble polyubiquitin conjugates less efficiently when they are produced in tm CDC34 cell extracts. A similar delay could cause ubiquitin depletion and/or create conditions under which abnormal polyubiquitin chains potently block the proteasome even without massive accumulation . Ubp14 function is not required in yeast [, this work], but an inhibition of ubiquitin receptors at the proteasome by an excess of free polyubiquitin  is thought to be responsible for the developmental defects associated with Ubp14 absence in multi-cellular organisms, including D. discoideum  and A. thaliana .
What linkages are present in polyubiquitin chains synthesized by tmCdc34 protein in vitro and in vivo, and whether the same linkages are present in substrate-attached and free polyubiquitin are yet unknown. These questions would best be addressed by quantitative mass spectrometry, as ubiquitin mutants could additionally affect the already fragile tmCdc34/SCF interaction interface (Figure 1B and 1C), which is sensitive to loss of phosphorylation within the C-terminus of tmCdc34 and does not properly respond to the regulation by substrate recruitment. What is the basis of the functional communication between the seemingly independent E2 and substrate-interacting domains of SCFCdc4 is yet unknown, but a similar communication is suggested by the observation that substrate recruitment promotes modification of the Cul1 homologue of Cdc53 with the Nedd8 ubiquitin-like protein, leading to E2 activation . Phosphorylation would potentiate the acidic nature of the C-terminus, but how the C-terminus of Cdc34 or tmCdc34 participates in the mechanism of polyubiquitination is also unclear, as the C-terminus is absent from all known E2 structures (Figure 1C, gray arrow). Why is Cka2, and not Cka1, essential in tm CDC34 yeast if each kinase phosphorylates the six most C-terminal serines in tmCdc34 in vitro? Cka1 and Cka2 could differ in their times or levels of expression, or localizations, or an undefined feature could give Cka2 a regulatory advantage in tm CDC34 cells.
Perhaps the most interesting question raised by our study is why the Cdc34/Ubc7-specific motif evolved at all if its replacement in Cdc34 has only a minimal effect on cell growth and division? It is possible that either motif can support Cdc34 function under typical laboratory conditions, but the mechanism defined by the original motif is better for survival under sub-optimal and/or stress conditions. As the only E2 essential for yeast viability and an E2 that has the largest number of substrates known, Cdc34 would likely be required to function under a variety of growth conditions. However, we cannot eliminate the possibility that the motif conservation reflects its ability to undergo post-transcriptional regulation that controls Cdc34 activity and/or levels. This possibility is suggested by the presence of serine residues in the S73/S97/loop motif and by the finding that the steady-state level of tmCdc34 is increased by about four-fold in a strain isogenic to CDC34 yeast. This change is significant, as the steady-state levels of Cdc34 do not change during the cell cycle  and are unaffected by replacement of all lysines to arginines that prevents autoubiquitination . Furthermore, even a five-fold enrichment of Cdc34 in mammalian cells is sufficient to inhibit an association of CENP-E with kinetochores and to either delay or block metaphase alignment of chromosomes [61, 62]; and a similar 4-fold accumulation of Cdc34 has been linked to the development of pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia . If such a modest increase in Cdc34 levels disregulates cell growth and division, a role of the S73/S97/loop motif in the control of Cdc34 activity and/or levels could play a role in its conservation. It will be of great interest to determine what aspect of the catalytic E2 motif function and/or regulation is responsible for its conservation.
Replacement of the catalytic S73/S97/loop motif that is conserved among all members of the Cdc34/Ubc7 family with the K73/D97/no loop motif present in other E2s compromises the polyubiquitination activity of Cdc34 in vitro and in vivo, and alters its regulation. However, either motif can support the essential function of Cdc34 in cell growth and division, at least under typical laboratory conditions, raising the question of what is the basis for the motif conservation. We discuss the possibility that growth under suboptimal and/or stress conditions, or a requirement for stringent regulation of Cdc34 levels via the serine residues present in the motif could explain the motif conservation. We predict that future analysis of the cellular pathways that are sensitive to the motif replacement will answer the question of the motif conservation and may define new roles and/or regulatory aspects of Cdc34. The essential role of Cka2, Rpn10 and Rad23 in tm CDC34 yeast  also opens the possibility to define the still enigmatic role of these cofactors in the SCF-proteasome pathway.
Yeast Strains and their construction
Yeast strains used in this study
MAT a dsk2::Kan R his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0
MAT a ubp14::Kan R his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ 0 ura3Δ0
MATα ubp14::Kan R his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0
MAT a his3-Δ200 leu2-3,112 ura3-52 pep4::HIS3 pYEX4T-+rec::CKA1
MAT a his3-Δ200 leu2-3,112 ura3-52 pep4::HIS3 pYEX4T-+rec::CKA2
MATα ura3-52 trp1-Δ63 leu2-Δ1
MAT a his3Δ200
MAT a CDC34 tm ura3 leu2 trp1 lys2 ade2 ade3
MATα mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3 can1Δ ura3Δ0 leu2Δ0 his3Δ1 lys2Δ0
MAT a CDC34 tm (NAT1) ura3 leu2 trp1 ade2 ade3
MAT a/α CDC34 tm (NAT1)/CDC34 ura3/ura3 leu2/leu2 trp1/TRP1 lys2/LYS2 ade2/ADE2 ade3/ADE3 his3/HIS3 MFA1/mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3 can1/CAN1
MATα cdc34tm(NAT1) mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3 his3Δ ura3Δ leu2Δ can1Δ
MATαCDC34(NAT1) mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3 his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 can1Δ
MAT a CDC34 tm (NAT1)
MAT a/α CDC34 tm (NAT1)/CDC34 ubp14::Kan R /UBP14 mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3/MFA1 his3Δ/his3Δ ura3/ura3Δ0 leu2/leu2Δ0 can1/CAN1 met15Δ0/MET15
MAT a/α CDC34(NAT1)/CDC34 ubp14::Kan R /UBP14 mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3/MFA1 his3Δ/his3Δ ura3/ura3Δ0 leu2/leu2Δ0 can1/CAN1 met15Δ0/MET15
MAT a/α CDC34 tm (NAT1)/CDC34 cka2::Kan R /CKA2 mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3/MFA1 his3Δ/his3Δ ura3/ura3Δ0 leu2/leu2Δ0 can1/CAN1 met15Δ0/MET15
MAT a/α CDC34(NAT1)/CDC34 cka2::Kan R /CKA2 mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3/MFA1 his3Δ/his3Δ ura3/ura3Δ0 leu2/leu2Δ0 can1/CAN1 met15Δ0/MET15
MAT a/α CDC34 tm (NAT1)/CDC34 rps7b::Kan R /RPS7B mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3/MFA1 his3Δ/his3Δ ura3/ura3Δ0 leu2/leu2Δ0 can1/CAN1 met15Δ0/MET15
MAT a/α CDC34(NAT1)/CDC34 rps7b::Kan R /RPS7B mfa1Δ::pMFA1-HIS3/MFA1 his3Δ/his3Δ ura3/ura3Δ0 leu2/leu2Δ0 can1/CAN1 met15 0/MET15
MAT a cdc34-2 leu2Δ1 ura3-52 trp1Δ63 his3Δ Gal+
Plasmids used in this study.
2μm, LEU2, Amp r , GAL10 promoter +CDC34
pYL150 with S97D mutation in CDC34
pYL150 with 12-residue deletion of G-103 to T-114 in CDC34
pYL150 with 12-residue deletion of G-103 to T-114 and S73K and S97D mutations in CDC34
ADH1 promoter and terminator elements + UBP14 in pVT102-U
ADH1 promoter and terminator elements +catalytically inactive UBP14(C354A) mutant in pVT102-U
Recombinant proteins and protein complexes
We used: apyrase, ubiquitin and methylated ubiquitin (Sigma); Lys48-linked multiubiquitin chains and Isopetidase T (Enzo Research); yeast Uba1His6 ; baculoviruses expressing yeast Sic1, Clb5, Cln2HA, GstCdc28, Cdc53, Rbx1, Cdc4, GstSkp1, FlagSkp1 [8, 10], and HAMet30 ; C-terminal His6 fusion (pET21+; Novagen) of full length Cdc34 , tmCdc34 (t riple m utant with the K73/D97/Δ12 instead of the S73/S97/loop motif, this work), Cdc346SA (with S207, 216, 263, 268, 282 and 292A replacements) ; Cdc34244 terminated at residue 244 , tmCdc34244 and Δ12Cdc34244 (this work); S207,216ACdc34244,tm,S207,216Cdc34244, C95ACdc34, S97ECdc34, Cdc34170, Rad6 (this work).
SCF, Sic1 and Cln2 complexes were assembled by co-infecting SF9 insect cells (Invitrogen) for 40 hours with the appropriate baculoviruses, followed by cell lysis and immunoprecipitation . Sic1 was phosphorylated as described previously .
All His-tagged proteins were expressed in E. coli (BL21 DE3 LysS) and purified on NTA resin (Qiagen) followed by DEAE and HPLC gel filtration chromatography on Superdex 200 (Amersham) in U buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 0.2 mM DTT).
GstCka1 and GstCka2 kinases were purified from yeast extracts prepared from cells harvested after 3 hours of treatment with 1 mM CuS04 during logarithmic growth on SD URA medium and blast-frozen in a 1:0.7 ratio of U buffer with 10% glycerol, protease and phosphatase inhibitors. 1 mg of total proteins was diluted to 1 ml with N buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Igepal, 0.1 mM DTT with protease and phosphatase inhibitors), incubated at 4°C with 20 μl of GSH Sepharose (Sigma) for 30 minutes, followed by beads wash, equilibration with U buffer and elution with 40 mM gluthation in buffer U, leading to ~10 ng/μl of GstCka1 or GstCka2.
Ubiquitination and phosphorylation in vitro
Ubiquitination was performed at 25°C for 1 hour or as indicated in 10 μl containing buffer U with 1 mM ATP, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 pmol of Uba1, 660 pmols of Ub, 2 pmol of FlagSCFCdc4 or GstSCFMet30 (where indicated), 2 pmol of Sic1/Cln5/GstCdc28 or FMet4 substrate (where indicated), and 1-5 pmol of the indicated Cdc34 proteins as specified in figures. For phosphorylation the assays included buffer U with 10 μM ATP and [32P] ATP (ICN) as indicated, the indicated E2 protein constructs, and GstCka1 or GstCka2. The reactions were analyzed by WB or autoradiography.
Preparation of yeast extracts with active ubiquitin-proteasome system
Yeast were grown at 30°C in 2 liters of YPD medium  starting from OD 0.05 and harvested in the logarithmic phase of growth. Yeast extracts (5-10 mg/ml proteins) were prepared by grinding cells blast-frozen in a 1:0.7 ratio of cells to buffer U (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5; 50 mM KCl; 0.2 mM DTT). The aliquots of extract were frozen in liquid nitrogen and used immediately after thawing. Note that this method does not preserve polyubiquitin conjugates that have been made in cells prior to lysis, because upon cell lysis in the absence of protease inhibitors the polyubiquitin conjugates are either degraded by the proteasome or disassembled by ubiquitin proteases.
Detection of ubiquitin conjugates in yeast cells
To assess the steady-state levels of ubiquitin conjugates in cells, yeast cells (2.5 × 108) were boiled directly in (150 μl) SDS-PAGE loading buffer with β-mercaptoethanol for 4 minutes at 100°C. Under such conditions, most proteins, including the proteasome and ubiquitin proteases (DUBs) are rapidly inactivated, therefore preserving polyubiquitin conjugates that were present in cells prior to lysis.
Western blot detection of super-stoichiometric amounts of free polyubiquitin chains
The sensitivity of Western blot detection is restricted by the concentration of the antibodies and the time of their incubation with the antigen-bearing membrane. Western blot performed with high concentrations of α-Ub antibodies (1:100 dilution) and/or for long incubation times (> 2 hr) allows detection of even small amounts of ubiquitin (~100 pmol). Western blot performed with low concentration of α-Ub antibodies (1:5000) and short incubation times (< 30 minutes) can detect only large amounts (μmol) of the same antigen. By varying these parameters, we established western blot conditions that allow detection of polyubiquitin chains only in amounts exceeding the amount of polyubiquitinated Sic1 (2 pmol), Cdc34 (a fraction of 4 pmol) and/or SCF subunits (a fraction of 2 pmol) in the reaction mixtures that were independently verified to contain polyubiquitinated Sic1, Cdc34 and/or SCF subunits via western blots performed with the more sensitive α-Sic1, α-Cdc34, α-Cdc4 or α-Cdc53 antibodies. The inability of western blots with α-Ub antibodies to detect polyubiquitinated Sic1, Cdc34 and/or SCF therefore serves as an internal control, which verifies that the α-Ub Western blots allow detection of only super-stoichiometric amounts of polyubiquitin conjugates. The free nature of these polyubiquitin conjugates is independently verified by their sensitivity to IsoT (see IsoT sensitivity assays).
Isopeptidase T sensitivity assays
Ubiquitination reactions were performed for 1 hour in the presence of ATP/MgCl2, Uba1, Ub, full length Cdc34 and SCFCdc4 but not Sic1. 50% of the total ubiquitination mixtures were then incubated at 25°C for 10 minutes with apyrase (0.5 unit), which by hydrolyzing ATP prevents function of the Uba1 E1 and stops ubiquitin conjugation, followed by enriched with DTT (10 mM final) and incubation with Isopeptidase T (0.5 mg) for additional 0-30 minutes. The reactions were stopped by boiling with SDS-PAGE loading buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by western blot with α-Ub antibodies.
Structural models of the E2 core (a.a. 1-170) of Cdc34 and tmCdc34 are shown in the context of structures of a scRad6 (gray ribbon representation; PDB ID 1AYZ; ) and scUbc7 fragment (gray ribbon representation; PDB ID 2UCZ; ). To model the ubiquitin-charged Cdc34 (a.a. 1-170) bound to the RING domain of Rbx1, scUbc7 structure (dark blue; PDB ID 2UCZ; ) was first superimposed with the structure of Ubc1 (light blue) charged with ubiquitin (green; PDB ID 1FXT; ) and with the structure of hUbc7 (not shown) in complex with the RING of c-Cbl (not shown; PDB ID 1FBV; ). The RING domain of c-Cbl was then used to position the RING domain Rbx1 in complex with Cul1 (red and yellow, respectively; PDB ID 1LDK; ). Note that the E2 core domain (a.a. 1-170) used for modeling does not include the 39 a.a. (a.a. 171-209) C-terminal fragment unique to Cdc34 that would extend from the alpha helix marked with a gray arrow. The amino acid numbers refer to the position of the residues in Cdc34. Models were done with the ICM program .
Cell cycle distributions
Yeast cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for their DNA content using propidium iodide staining .
Acknowledgements and Funding
We thank B. Harris and P. Roach for discussions, M. Hochstrasser and B. Sarcevic for reagents. This work was funded by NIH grant R01 GM65267 (DS) and NSF grant MCB-0091317 (MG).
- Hershko A, Ciechanover A: The Ubiquitin System. Ann Rev Biochem 1998, 67: 425–79. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thrower JS, Hoffman L, Rechsteiner M, Pickart C: Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J 2000, 19: 94–102. 10.1093/emboj/19.1.94PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pickart CM, Fushman D: Polyubiquitin chains: polymeric protein signals. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2004, 8: 610–6. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.09.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro C: RING domain ubiquitin E3 ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 2009, 78: 399–434. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goebl MG, Yochem J, Jentsch S, McGrath J, Varshavsky A, Byers B: The yeast cell cycle gene CDC34 encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Science 1988, 241: 1331–1335. 10.1126/science.2842867View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mathias N, Johnson SL, Winey M, Adams AAE, Goetsch L, Pringle JR, Byers B, Goebl MG: Cdc53p acts in concert with Cdc4p and Cdc34p to control the G1 to S phase transition and identifies a conserved family of proteins. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 12: 6634–6643.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwab M, Bohm T, Mendenhall MD, Nasmyth K: The B-type cyclin kinase inhibitor p40Sic1 controls the G1/S transition in S. cerevisiae. Cell 1994, 79: 233–244. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90193-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skowyra D, Craig KL, Tyers M, Elledge SJ, Harper JW: F-box proteins Are Receptors that Recruit Phosphorylated Substrates to the SCF Ubiquitin Ligase Complex. Cell 1997, 91: 209–219. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80403-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feldman RM, Correll CC, Kaplan KB, Deshaies RJ: A complex of Cdc4, Skp1, and Cdc53/cullin catalyzes ubiquitination of the phosphorylated CDK inhibitor Sic1. Cell 1997, 91: 221–30. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80404-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamura T, Koepp DM, Conrad MN, Skowyra D, Moreland RJ, Iliopoulos O, Lane WS, Kaelin WG Jr, Elledge S, Conaway RC, Harper WJ, Conaway JW: Rbx1, a Component of the Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Complex and Subunit of SCF Ubiquitin Ligase. Science 1999, 284: 657–661. 10.1126/science.284.5414.657View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seol JH, Feldman RM, Zachariae W, Shevchenko A, Correll CC, Lyapina S, Chi J, Galova M, Claypool J, Sandmeyer S, Nasmyth K, Shevchenko A, Deshaies RJ: Cdc53/cullin and the essential Hrt1 RING-H2 subunit of SCF define a ubiquitin ligase module that activates the E2 enzyme Cdc34. Genes & Development 1999, 13: 1614–1626.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mathias N, Steussy CN, Goebl MG: An essential domain within Cdc34p is required for binding to a complex containing Cdc4p and Cdc53p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 1998, 273: 4040–5. 10.1074/jbc.273.7.4040View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kleiger G, Hao B, Mohl DA, Deshaies RJ: The acidic tail of the Cdc34 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme functions in both binding to and catalysis with ubiquitin ligase SCF Cdc4 . J Biol Chem 2009, 284: 36012–23. 10.1074/jbc.M109.058529PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kleiger G, Saha A, Lewis S, Kuhlman B, Deshaies RJ: Rapid E2-E3 assembly and disassembly enable processive ubiquitylation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase substrates. Cell 2009, 139: 957–968. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.030PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kolman CJ, Toth J, Gonda DK: Identification of a portable determinant of cell cycle function within the carboxyl-terminal domain of the yeast CDC34 (UBC3 ) ubiquitin conjugating (E2) enzyme. EMBO J 1992, 11: 3081–3090.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silver ET, Gwozd TJ, Ptak C, Goebl M, Ellison MJ: A chimeric ubiquitin conjugating enzyme that combines the cell cycle properties of CDC34 ( UBC3 ) and the DNA repair properties of RAD6 ( UBC2 ): implications for the structure, function and evolution of the E2s. EMBO J 1992, 11: 3091–8.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Mathias N, Steussy CN, Goebl MG: Intragenic suppression among CDC34 (UBC3) mutations defines a class of ubiquitin-conjugating catalytic domains. Mol Cell Biol 1995, 15: 5635–5644.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ: Mechanism of lysine 48-linked ubiquitin-chain synthesis by the cullin-RING ubiquitin-ligase complex SCF-Cdc34. Cell 2005, 123: 1107–20. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.033View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sowa ME, Harper JW: From loops to chains: unraveling the mysteries of polyubiquitin chain specificity and processivity. ACS Chemical Biology 2006, 1: 20–4. 10.1021/cb0600020View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varelas X, Ptak C, Ellison MJ: Cdc34 self-association is facilitated by ubiquitin thiolester formation and is required for its catalytic activity. Mol Cell Biol 2003, 23: 5388–400. 10.1128/MCB.23.15.5388-5400.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gazdoiu S, Yamoah K, Wu K, Escalante CR, Tappin I, Bermudez V, Aggarwal AK, Hurwitz J, Pan ZQ: Proximity-induced activation of human Cdc34 through heterologous dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102: 15053–8. 10.1073/pnas.0507646102PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cocklin R, Heyen J, Larry T, Tyers M, Goebl M: New insights into the role of the Cdc34 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in cell cycle regulation via Ace2 and Sic1. Genetics 2011, 110: 125302.Google Scholar
- Sadowski M, Mawson A, Baker R, Sarcevic B: Cdc34 carboxy-terminal tail phosphorylation regulates SCF-mediated ubiquitination and cell cycle progression. Biochem J 2007, 405: 569–581. 10.1042/BJ20061812PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coccetti P, Tripodi F, Tadeschi G, Nonnis S, Marin O, Fantinato S, Cirulli C, Vanoni M, Algerghina L: The CK2 phosphorylation of catalytic domain of Cdc34 modulates its activity at the G 1 to S transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Cycle 2008, 7: 1391–1401. 10.4161/cc.7.10.5825View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verma R, Oania R, Graumann J, Deshaies RJ: Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell 2004, 118: 99–110. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madura K: Rad23 and Rpn10: perennial wallflowers join the melee. TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences 2004, 29: 637–640. 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.10.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ptak C, Prendergast JA, Hodgins R, Kay CM, Chau V, Ellison MJ: Functional and physical characterization of the cell cycle ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme CDC34 ( UBC3 ); Identification of a functional determinant within the tail that facilitates CDC34 self-association. J Biol Chem 1994, 269: 26539–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scaglione KM, Bansal PK, Deffenbaugh AE, Kiss A, Moore JM, Korolev S, Cocklin R, Goebl M, Kitagawa K, Skowyra D: SCF E3-mediated autoubiquitination negatively regulates activity of Cdc34 E2 but plays a nonessential role in the catalytic cycle in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 2007, 27: 5860–70. 10.1128/MCB.01555-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deffenbaugh AE, Scaglione KM, Zhang L, Moore JM, Buranda T, Sklar LA, Skowyra D: Release of ubiquitin-charged Cdc34-S-Ub from the RING domain is essential for ubiquitination of the SCFCdc4-bound substrate Sic1. Cell 2003, 114: 611–22. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00641-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ: Context of multiubiquitin chain attachment influences the rate of Sic1 degradation. Mol Cell 2003, 11: 1435–1444. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00221-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K, Howson RW, Belle A, Dephoure N, O'Shea EK, Weissman JA: Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 2003, 425: 737–41. 10.1038/nature02046View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flick K, Ouni I, Wohlschlegel JA, Capati C, McDonald WH, Yates JR, Kaiser P: Proteolysis-independent regulation of the transcription factor Met4 by a single Lys 48-linked ubiquitin chain. Nat Cell Biol 2004, 6: 634–41. 10.1038/ncb1143View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chandrasekaran S, Deffenbaugh AE, Ford DA, Bailly E, Mathias N, Skowyra D: Destabilization of binding to cofactors and SCFMet30 is the rate-limiting regulatory step in degradation of polyubiquitinated Met4. Mol Cell 2006, 24: 689–99. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.10.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tan P, Fuchs SY, Chen A, Wu K, Gomez C, Ronai Z, Pan ZQ: Recruitment of a ROC1: Cullin1 ubiquitin ligase by Skp1 and HOS to catalyze the ubiquitination of IkBa. Mol Cell 1999, 3: 527–533. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80481-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohta T, Michael JJ, Schottelius AJ, Xiong Y: ROC1, a homolog of APC11, represents a family of cullin partners with an associated ubiquitin ligase activity. Mol Cell 1999, 3: 535–541. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80482-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu K, Chen A, Pan ZQ: Conjugation of Nedd8 to CUL1 enhances the ability of the ROC1-CUL1 complex to promote ubiquitin polymerization. J Biol Chem 2000, 275: 32317–24. 10.1074/jbc.M004847200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson KD, Tashayev VL, O'Connor LB, Larsen CM, Kasperek E, Pickart CM: Metabolism of the polyubiquitin degradation signal: structure, mechanism, and role of Isopeptidase T. Biochemistry 1995, 34: 14535–46. 10.1021/bi00044a032View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amerik A, Swaminathan S, Krantz BA, Wilkinson KD, Hochstrasser M: In vivo disassembly of free polyubiquitin chains by yeast Ubp14 modulates rates of protein degradation by the proteasome. EMBO J 1997, 16: 4826–38. 10.1093/emboj/16.16.4826PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verma R, Chen S, Feldman R, Schieltz D, Yates J, Dohmen J, Deshaies RJ: Proteasomal proteomics: identification of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affinity-purified proteasomes. Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11: 3425–39.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uchiki T, Kim HT, Zhai B, Gygi SP, Johnston JA, O'Bryan JP, Goldberg A: The ubiquitin-interacting motif protein, S5a, is ubiquitinated by all types of ubiquitin ligases by a mechanism different from typical substrate recognition. J Biol Chem 2009, 284: 12622–32. 10.1074/jbc.M900556200PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim HT, Kim KP, Uchiki T, Gygi SP, Goldberg A: S5a promotes protein degradation by blocking synthesis of nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains. EMBO J 2009, 28: 1867–1877. 10.1038/emboj.2009.115PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hicke L: Protein regulation by monoubiquitination. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001, 2: 195–201. 10.1038/35056583View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shukla A, Chaurasia P, Bhaumik SR: Histone methylation and ubiquitination with their cross-talk and roles in gene expression and stability. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009, 66: 1419–1433. 10.1007/s00018-008-8605-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gregory RC, Taniguchi T, D'Andrea A: Regulation of Fanconi aneamia pathway by monoubiquitination. Seminars in Cancer Biology 2002, 13: 77–82. 10.1016/S1044-579X(02)00102-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ulrich HD: Deubuquitinating PCNA: a downside to DNA damage tolerance. Nature Cell Biol 2006, 8: 303–305. 10.1038/ncb0406-303View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li W, Tu D, Li L, Wollert T, Ghirlando R, Brunger AT, Ye Y: Mechanistic insights into active site-associated polyubiquitination by the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ube2g2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106: 3722–3727. 10.1073/pnas.0808564106PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brzovic PS, Keeffe JR, Nishikawa H, Miyamoto K, Fox D, Fukuda M, Ohta T, Klevit R: Binding and recognition in the assembly of an active BRCA1/BARD1 ubiquitin-ligase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100: 5646–51. 10.1073/pnas.0836054100PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brzovic PS, Lissounov A, Christensen DE, Hoyt DW, Klevit RE: A UbcH5/ubiquitin noncovalent complex is required for processive BRCA1-directed ubiquitination. Mol Cell 2006, 21: 873–80. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brzovic PS, Klevit RE: Ubiquitin transfer from the E2 perspective: why is UbcH5 so promiscuous? Cell Cycle 2006, 5: 2867–73. 10.4161/cc.5.24.3592View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christensen DE, Brzovic PS, Klevit RE: E2-BRCA1 RING interactions dictate synthesis of mono- or specific polyubiquitin chain linkages. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007, 14: 941–8. 10.1038/nsmb1295View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sadowski M, Suryadinata R, Lai X, Heierhorst J, Sarcevic B: Molecular Basis for Lysine Specificity in the yeast ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34. Mol Cell Biol 2010, 30: 2316–2329. 10.1128/MCB.01094-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sadowski M, Sarcevic B: Mechanisms of mono- and poly-ubiquitination: ubiquitination specificity depends on compatibility between the E2 catalytic core and amino acid residues proximal to the lysine. Cell Division 2010, 5: 20. 10.1186/1747-1028-5-19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim HT, Kim KP, Lledias F, Kisselev AF, Scaglione KM, Skowyra D, Gygi SP, Goldberg AL: Certain pairs of ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2s) and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s) synthesize nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains containing all possible isopeptide linkages. J Biol Chem 2007, 282: 17375–17386. 10.1074/jbc.M609659200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christensen DE, Klevit RE: Dynamic interactions of proteins in complex networks: identifying the complete set of interacting E2s for functional investigation of E3-dependent protein ubiquitination. FEBS J 2009, 276: 5381–89. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07249.xPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reyes Turcu FE, Ventil KH, Wilkinson KD: Regulation and Cellular Roles of Ubiquitin-specific Deubiquitinating Enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem 2009, 78: 363–397. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.082307.091526View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raasi S, Varadan R, Fushman D, Pickart CM: Diverse polyubiquitin interaction properties of ubiquitin-associated domains. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005, 12: 708–14. 10.1038/nsmb962View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piotrowski J, Beal R, Wilkinson KD, Cohem RE, Pickart CM: Inhibition of the 26 S proteasome by polyubiquitin chains synthesized to have defined lengths. J Biol Chem 1997, 272: 23712–21. 10.1074/jbc.272.38.23712View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindsey DF, Amerik A, Deery WJ, Bishop JD, Hochstrasser M, Gomer RH: A deubiquitinating enzyme that disassembles free polyubiquitin chains is required for development but not growth in Dictyostelium. J Biol Chem 1998, 273: 29178–87. 10.1074/jbc.273.44.29178View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doelling JH, Yan N, Kurepa J, Walker J, Viestra RD: The ubiquitin-specific protease UBP14 is essential for early embrio development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2001, 27: 393–405. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01106.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bornstein G, Ganoth D, Hershko A: Regulation of neddylation and deneddylation of cullin1 in SCFSkp2 ubiquitin ligase by F-box protein and substrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103: 11515–20. 10.1073/pnas.0603921103PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Topper LM, Bastians H, Ruderman JV, Gorbsky G: Elevating the level of Cdc34/Ubc3 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in mitosis inhibits association of CENP-E with kinetochores and blocks the metaphase alignment of chromosomes. J Cell Biol 2001, 154: 707–717. 10.1083/jcb.200104130PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Q, Shang F, Whitcomb E, Guo W, Li W, Taylor A: Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 3 delays human lens epithelial cells in metaphase. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006, 47: 1302–9. 10.1167/iovs.05-0935View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eliseeva E, Debananda P, Diccinanni MB, Yu AL, Mohsin SK, Margolin JF, Plon SE: Expression and Localization of the CDC34 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cell Growth and Differentiation 2001, 12: 427–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rose M D, Winston F, Hieter P: Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY; 1990.Google Scholar
- Babbitt SE, Kiss A, Deffenbaugh AE, Chang YH, Bailly E, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Buranda T, Sklar LA, Baumler J, Gogol E, Skowyra D: ATP hydrolysis-dependent disassembly of the 26 S proteasome is part of the catalytic cycle. Cell 2005, 121: 553–65. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Worthylake DK, Prakash S, Prakash L, Hill CP: Crystal structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Rad6 at 2.6 A resolution. J Biol Chem 1998, 273: 6271–6. 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6271View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cook WJ, Martin P D, Edwards B F, Yamazaki RK, Chau V: Crystal structure of a class I ubiquitin conjugating enzyme (Ubc7) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 2.9 angstroms resolution. Biochemistry 1997, 36: 1621–7. 10.1021/bi962639eView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton KS, Ellison MJ, Barber KR, Williams RS, Huzil JT, McKenna S, Ptak C, Glover M, Shaw GS: Structure of a conjugating enzyme-ubiquitin thiolester intermediate reveals a novel role for the ubiquitin tail. Structure 2001, 9: 897–904. 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00657-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng N, Wang P, Jeffrey PD, Pavletich NP: Structure of a c-Cbl-UbcH7 complex: RING domain function in ubiquitin-protein ligases. Cell 2000, 102: 533–9. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00057-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng N, Schulman BA, Song L, Miller JJ, Jeffrey PD, Wang P, Chu C, Koepp DM, Elledge SJ, Pagano M, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Harper JW, Pavletich NP: Structure of the Cul1-Rbx1-Skp1-F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Nature 2002, 416: 703–9. 10.1038/416703aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cardozo T, Totrov M, Abagyan R: Homology modeling by the ICM method. Proteins 1995, 23: 403–14. 10.1002/prot.340230314View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haase SB, Lew DJ: Flow cytometric analysis of DNA content in budding yeast. Methods Enzymol 1997, 283: 322–32. full_textView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, Andre B, Bangham R, Benito R, Boeke JD, Bussey H, Chu AM, Connelly C, Davis K, Dietrich F, Dow SW, El Bakkoury M, Foury F, Friend SH, Gentalen E, Giaever G, Hegemann JH, Jones T, Laub M, Liao H, Liebundguth N, Lockhart DJ, Lucau-Danila A, Lussier M, M'Rabet N, Menard P, et al.: Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 1999, 285: 901–906. 10.1126/science.285.5429.901View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martzen MR, McCraith SM, Spinelli SL, Torres FM, Fields S, Grayhack EJ: A biochemical genomics approach for identifying genes by the activity of their products. Science 1999, 286: 1153–1155. 10.1126/science.286.5442.1153View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.