Skip to main content

MiR-146b-5p/SEMA3G regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Abstract

Objective

The primary purpose was to unveil how the miR-146b-5p/SEMA3G axis works in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods

ccRCC dataset was acquired from TCGA database, and target miRNA to be studied was further analyzed using survival analysis. We performed miRNA target gene prediction through the database, and those predicted miRNAs were intersected with differential mRNAs. After calculating the correlation between miRNAs and mRNAs, we completed the GSEA pathway enrichment analysis on mRNAs. MiRNA and mRNA expression was examined by qRT-PCR. Western blot was introduced to detect SEMA3G, MMP2, MMP9 expression, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker proteins, and Notch/TGF-β signaling pathway-related proteins. Targeted relationship between miRNA and mRNA was validated using a dual-luciferase test. Transwell assay was employed to assess cell migration and invasion. Wound healing assay was adopted for evaluation of migration ability. The effect of different treatments on cell morphology was observed by a microscope.

Results

In ccRCC cells, miR-146b-5p was remarkably overexpressed, yet SEMA3G was markedly less expressed. MiR-146b-5p was capable of stimulating ccRCC cell invasion, migration and EMT, and promoting the transformation of ccRCC cell morphology to mesenchymal state. SEMA3G was targeted and inhibited via miR-146b-5p. MiR-146b-5p facilitated ccRCC cell migration, invasion, morphology transforming to mesenchymal state and EMT process by targeting SEMA3G and regulating Notch and TGF-β signaling pathways.

Conclusion

MiR-146b-5p regulated Notch and TGF-β signaling pathway by suppressing SEMA3G expression, thus promoting the growth of ccRCC cells, which provides a possible target for ccRCC therapy and prognosis prediction.

Introduction

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a predominant histology of RCC, occupying 75% of RCC patients [1]. Distant metastases have been observed in 25–30% of new cases with ccRCC each year [2]. Changes in the microenvironment that entails epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), such as inflammation, angiogenesis, cancerous stroma, and vascular intercalation, control the progression of cancer metastasis [3]. EMT has also been linked to the pathogenesis of ccRCC [4, 5]. Therefore, studying the underlying molecular mechanisms of ccRCC metastasis and EMT is beneficial for the precise treatment of ccRCC. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) act as regulators in metastasis and EMT phenotypes of cancer cells [6, 7], so we invesgated miRNAs in this study.

As one of the subtypes of non-coding RNAs, miRNAs can specifically recognize and bind to 3ʹ-untranslated region (3ʹ-UTR) of downstream target mRNAs, facilitating mRNA degradation and impeding target gene translation [8]. MiR-146b-5p can play a pro-cancer or anti-cancer role in cancer progression. Shi et al. [9] showed that miR-146b-5p could promote colorectal cancer development through targeting TRAF6. Ren et al. [10] disclosed that miR-146b-5p is a cholangiocarcinoma inhibitor through targeting TRAF6 to repress proliferation and stimulate apoptosis of cholangiocarcinoma cells. Notably, Zhang et al. [11] proved that LINC01535/miR-146b-5p/TRIM2 axis could regulate ccRCC progression via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. At present, limited research has focused on molecular modulatory mechanism of miR-146b-5p in ccRCC, and the correction between miR-146b-5p and ccRCC  still has great research. Here, miR-146b-5p was taken as the target gene to study its regulatory mechanism in ccRCC development and the downstream regulatory gene SEMA3 was found.

Class 3 semaphorins (SEMA3) is a  secreted glycoproteins, approximately 100 kDa consisting of seven isoforms (SEMA3A-G), which is linked to the development of nervous system and axon guidance [12]. The role of SEMA3 in multiple effectors signaling has been found to regulate the formation of dermal lymphatic networks negatively [13]. Regarding SEMA3G, research discovered that PPAR-γ could enhance the migration of endothelial cell by promoting SEMA3G expression [14]. In addition, in a Nrp2/PlexinD1-dependent manner, SEMA3G stimulates distribution of lymphatic endothelial cells away from arteries and generates a branching network during arterial lymphatic development [15]. At present, it has been predicted that SEMA3G can be used as a prognostic indicator in ccRCC [16, 17], but there is no relevant report on the mechanism of SEMA3G in ccRCC. Our investigation found that miR-146b-5p inhibited the expression of SEMA3 expression and affected EMT in ccRCC, and it has been reported that EMT is associated with the Notch and TGF-β signaling pathways [18], so we added contents related to the Notch and TGF-β signaling in our study.

Notch receptor comprises an intracellular domain and an extracellular domain with nuclear localization motifs. Evidence suggests that Notch activity dysregulation is linked to cancer development like breast cancer [19], ovarian cancer [20], prostate cancer [21], and colorectal cancer [22]. TGF-β signaling is the most well-studied mechanism for inducing EMT, and it works via a variety of intracellular messengers. TGF-β superfamily ligands, which contain 3 TGF isoforms (TGF1, 2, and 3) and 6 BMP isoforms, generally activate signaling (BMP2 to BMP7). TGF-β signaling pathway has a connection with the development of cancers, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [23], liver cancer [24], prostate cancer [21], breast cancer [25], and small cell lung cancer [26]. We evaluated the impacts of miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G on the Notch and TGF-β signaling pathways in ccRCC.

This research aimed to clarify how miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G affected the modulation of Notch and TGF-β signaling, thus identifying their roles in ccRCC development. We experimentally discovered that miR-146b-5p enhanced cell growth in ccRCC cells by down-regulating SEMA3G expression and regulating the Notch and TGF-β signaling pathways.

Materials and methods

Bioinformatics

Expression data of ccRCC mRNAs (normal: 72, tumor: 539) and mature miRNAs (normal: 71, tumor: 545) were retrieved from TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). The R package “edgeR” (log|FC|> 1.5, FDR < 0.05) was employed to compare the expression of miRNA and mRNA in the normal and tumor groups (log|FC|> 1.5, FDR < 0.05). And we utilized R package “survival” to examine association between miR-146b-5p and the prognoses of ccRCC patients. To determine miRNA downstream regulatory target genes, we used the miRDB (http://mirdb.org/), TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/), starBase (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/) and mirDIP (http://ophid.utoronto.ca/mirDIP/index.jsp#r) databases. Differential mRNAs with targeted binding sites to target miRNAs were screened, which were intersected with differentially down-regulated mRNAs. Then target genes were finally determined using correlation analysis. GSEA software was applied to perform a KEGG analysis.

Cell culture

BeNa Culture Collection (BNCC, China) provided human normal renal cell lines HK-2 (BNCC339833), ccRCC cell lines 786-O (BNCC338472), 769-P (BNCC341606), Caki-2 (BNCC340136) and renal carcinoma cell line A498 (BNCC338630). Cells were cultivated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 ℃. The mediums used for each cell line were as follows:

HK-2, A498, 769-P cell lines: RPMI-1640 medium (BNCC341471, BNCC, China) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS);

786-O cell line: DMEM medium (BNCC351841, BNCC, China) containing 10% FBS;

Caki-2 cell line: McCoy’s 5a culture medium (BNCC341856, BNCC, China) containing 10% FBS.

Cell transfection

MiR-146b-5p mimic (miR-mimic) and mimic NC (miR-NC), miR-146b-5p inhibitor (miR-inhibitor) and inhibitor NC (inhibitor-NC), pcDNA3.1-SEMA3G plasmid encoding SEMA3G (oe-SEMA3G), and blank pcDNA3.1 plasmid (oe-NC) vectors were all acquired from RiboBio (China). 786-O cell line was transfected with miR-inhibitor/inhibitor-NC and miR-mimic/miR-NC or pcDNA3.1-SEMA3G/blank pcDNA3.1 plasmid was transfected into Caki-2 cell line by Lipofectamine 2000 kit (Invitrogen, USA). Transfection efficiency was detected after 24 h of transfection. Transfection sequences are shown in Table 1. Additionally, to evaluate whether the transfection efficiency changed with transfection time, we further explored the transfection efficiency after 48 h and 72 h.

Table 1 Transfection sequences of genes

Real-time PCR detection

TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, USA) was the tool for extracting total RNA from cells, and RNA concentration was assayed on NanoDrop 2000 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Hairpin-it miRNAs qRT-PCR kit (GenePharm, China) was used to reverse-transcribe miRNAs into cDNA, and PrimeScript RT Master Mix (Takara, Japan) was applied to reverse-transcribe mRNA into cDNA. MiRNA and mRNA expression were evaluated using miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and SYBR® Premix Ex Taq TM II (Takara, Japan). The endogenous control for miR-146b-5p was U6, and that for SEMA3G and other mRNAs was GAPDH. Relative expression of miR-146b-5p and mRNAs was compared using the 2−ΔΔCt value. Table 2 lists the primer sequences.

Table 2 Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR

Western blot

RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was employed to extract proteins, and protein quantification was determined by the BCA Kit (Beyotime, China). After proteins (30 µg per lane) were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels, they were transferred onto PVDF (Millipore, USA) membranes. Membranes were blocked for 2 h with 5% nonfat dried milk and then maintained with primary antibodies at 4 ℃ overnight. Membranes were then rinsed three times in PBST buffer for 30 min and probed with secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h. Protein signals were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Primary antibodies employed in this research were: rabbit anti-SEMA3G (ab197108, 1:500), rabbit anti-MMP2 (ab92536, 1:2000), rabbit anti-MMP9 (ab76003, 1:2000), rabbit anti-Snail1 (ab216347, 1:1000), rabbit anti-Snail2 (Slug, ab63568, 1:500), rabbit anti-E-cadherin (ab40772, 1:25,000), rabbit anti-N-cadherin (ab18203, 1:10,000), rabbit anti-Vimentin (ab92547, 1:3000), rabbit anti-Notch1 (ab52627, 1:1500), rabbit anti-Hes1 (ab108937, 1:1000), rabbit anti-Hes5 (ab194111, 1:1000), rabbit anti-TGFβR1 (ab235178, 1:1000), rabbit anti-TGFβR2 (ab186838, 1:1000), rabbit anti-Smad3 (ab40854, 1:5000), rabbit anti-p-Smad3 (ab52903, 1:2000) and rabbit anti-GAPDH (ab181602, 1:10,000). Secondary antibody was goat-anti-rabbit IgG (ab205718, 1:10,000). All of them were procured from Abcam (UK).

Transwell assay

ccRCC cells (1 × 105 cells) were plated into the upper chamber of the device coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, USA). Next, 700 μL of DMEM containing 20% FBS was filled into the lower chamber. The cells were kept routine conditions for 24 h. The non-invaded cells were removed from the filter membrane, and invaded ones were immobilized with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and dyed with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min. Photographs were taken under a microscope and cells passing through the membrane were counted. Matrigel was not applied to the upper chamber in the migration assay, and other steps were the same with the invasion assay.

Wound healing experiment

Cells at the logarithmic growth phase (2 × 105 cells/well) were plated with 6-well plates, with a volume of 2 mL per well. When the cells filled the wells, the cell layer in each well was marked with a “ + ” with a sterilized 200 μL pipette tip. When scratching, pipette tip was kept perpendicular to the bottom of the plate to ensure the scratch straight and uniform. Then cells were rinsed 4 times with PBS to wash off scratched cells. The remained cells were kept in serum-free DMEM. The wound healing condition was observed and photoed at 0 h and 24 h of incubation.

Dual-luciferase assay

Binding of miR-146b-5p to the 3ʹ-UTR of SEMA3G was identified via dual-luciferase assay. Firstly, pmirGLO-SEMA3G-3ʹ-UTR-WT and pmirGLO-SEMA3G-3ʹ-UTR-MUT luciferase reporter vectors (Promega, USA) were established. The ccRCC cell line Caki-2 was plated in 96-well plates (2 × 105 cells/well) and co-transfected with 3 µg of miR-mimic/miR NC and SEMA3G-WT/SEMA3G-MUT plasmids. Luciferase activity was measured after 48 h of culture on Dual-Luciferase Reporter System (Promega, USA).

Analysis of statistics

All data were processed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (La Jolla, CA) and presented as mean ± standard deviation. Two-group comparing was done using t-test. One-way ANOVA analysis of variance was used for comparison of more than three groups. All experiments were performed in 3 biological replicates. *P < 0.05 indicates statistical differencee, **P<0.01 indicates significant difference, ***P<0.001 indicates extremely significant difference.

Result

MiR-146b-5p is significantly highly expressed in ccRCC cells, and correlates with poor prognosis

Firstly, TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) was utilized to predict miR-146b-5p expression. Compared to normal renal tissues, miR-146b-5p was strikingly and strongly expressed in ccRCC tissues (Fig. 1A). Next, we used the R package “survival” to measure correlation between miR-146b-5p expression and data from 10-year follow-up of the ccRCC patients. We further performed Kaplan–Meier (K–M) survival curves to analyze the results, which showed that patients with higher expression of miR-146b-5p presented prominently shorter overall survival than those with lower miR-146b-5p expression (Fig. 1B). Based on the results of the above bioinformatics analyses, we further analyzed miR-146b-5p expression at cellular level. The results of qRT-PCR revealed that miR-146b-5p expression in ccRCC cells was much higher than in normal human renal cells. (Fig. 1C). Then, miR-146b-5p mimic or miR-146b-5p inhibitor were transfected into ccRCC cells to reveal the potential role of miR-146b-5p in ccRCC. Since miR-146b-5p expression was highest in 786-O cell line and lowest in Caki-2 cell line, the 786-O was used for knockdown treatment, and the Caki-2 was used for overexpression treatment, and transfection efficiency was examined by qRT-PCR. We evaluated transfection efficiency of miR-146b-5p mimic in Caki-2 cells or of miR-146b-5p inhibitor in 786-O cells at 24, 48, and 72 h, and the results demonstrated that the transfection efficiency at 24 h reached a good level. Therefore, the subsequent transfection time was set as 24 h (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). MiR-146b-5p expression was reduced in 786-O cells with miR-146b-5p inhibitor (Fig. 1D), which was increased in Caki-2 cells with miR-146b-5p mimic (Fig. 1E). These findings indicated that miR-146b-5p was significant high-expressed in ccRCC cells and correlated with poor prognosis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

MiR-146b-5p is highly expressed in ccRCC cells. A: Expression of miR-146b-5p, blue box plot indicates normal samples, yellow box plot indicates tumor samples; B: Overall survival curve of miR-146b-5p expression level on patients, red represents high miR-146b-5p expression, blue represents low miR-146b-5p expression; C: Expression of miR-146b-5p in normal cell line HK-2 and ccRCC cell lines 786-O, A498, 769-P and Caki-2; D: Transfection efficiency of knockdown miR-146b-5p in 786-O cells; E: Transfection efficiency of overexpression miR-146b-5p in Caki-2 cells; All the above experiments were performed with 3 biological replicates; ** P  <0.01 indicates siginficant difference, ***P<0.001 indicates extremely significant difference.

MiR-146b-5p enhances migration, invasion and EMT of ccRCC cells

It has been validated that abnormal expression of miR-146b-5p is implicated in progression of malignancies [27,28,29]. Next, we explored the modulatory role of miR-146b-5p in migration, invasion and EMT of ccRCC cells. We used transwell test and wound healing experiment to assess cell migration and invasion. The findings illustrated that knocking down miR-146b-5p markedly decreased ccRCC cell migration and invasion, whereas overexpressing miR-146b-5p boosted ccRCC cell migration and invasion considerably (Fig. 2A, B). MMP2 and MMP9 are strongly expressed in varying malignant tumor tissues and are strongly associated with tumor cell invasion and metastasis [30]. Therefore, we analyzed the expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in ccRCC cells via western blot assay, which showed that miR-146b-5p knockdown evidently suppressed expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in ccRCC cells. However, overexpression of miR-146b-5p evidently enhanced the levels of MMP2 and MMP9 (Fig. 2C), which confirmed the experimental results in Fig. 2A, B. Many mechanistic investigations have discovered that elevated miR-146b-5p expression can trigger EMT and play a tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressing role [31, 32]. Therefore, we looked in whether miR-146b-5p could influence EMT progression of ccRCC cells. Firstly, we analyzed the cell morphology of ccRCC cells under the microscope, which presented that miR-146b-5p mimic treatment enhanced Caki-2 cell adhesion and polarity, reduced pseudopodia formation. While the changes after miR-146b-5p inhibitor treatment in 786-O cells were opposite (Fig. 2D). In addition, Snail1 and Snail2 are important transcription factors in EMT and are closely related to Notch signaling pathway [33,34,35]. Therefore, when detecting mRNA and protein expression levels of EMT markers using qRT-PCR and western blot, the expression levels of Snail1, Snail2 (Slug) and Notch1 were also detected. qRT-PCR and western blot unraveled that knocking down miR-146b-5p elevated the expression of EMT marker protein E-cadherin but reduced the expression of Notch1, Snail1, Snail2, N-cadherin and Vimentin in ccRCC cells, suggesting that EMT process of ccRCC cells was hindered. Increased miR-146b-5p had the opposite results, indicating that overexpressed miR-146b-5p promoted EMT process of ccRCC cells (Fig. 2E, F). Taken together, the above results suggested that miR-146b-5p could facilitate migration, invasion, and EMT of ccRCC cells.

Fig. 2
figure 2figure 2

MiR-146b-5p promotes migration, invasion and EMT of ccRCC cells. A, B: Transwell assay and wound healing experiment were employed to determine the migratory and invasive abilities of ccRCC cells 786–O and Caki-2 in different treatment groups (100 ×); C: Western blot assay was employed to measure the expression levels of MMP2 and MMP9 in 786–O and Caki-2cells in different treatment groups; D: The morphology of 786–O and Caki-2 cells in each transfection group was observed under microscope; E: qRT-PCR evaluated the mRNA levels of Notch1, Snail1, Snail2, E-cadherin, N-cadherin and Vimentin in 786–O and Caki-2 cells; F: The protein expression of Notch1, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Vimentin, Snail1, Snail2, and GAPDH in ccRCC cells 786–O and Caki-2 in different treatment groups; All the above experiments were performed with 3 biological replicates; * P < 0.05 indicates statistical difference, **P<0.01 indicates significant difference, ***P<0.001 indicates extremely siginficant difference.

MiR-146b-5p targetes and down regulates SEMA3G expression

To unravel the modulatory mechanism of miR-146b-5p downstream in ccRCC cells, we performed the differential analysis of mRNAs in TCGA-KIRC database. We intersected differentially down-regulated mRNAs with miR-146b-5p target genes predicted through TargetScan, miRDB, mirDIP, and starBase databases, and obtained 6 differential mRNAs which had targeted binding sites with miR-146b-5p (Fig. 3A). Next, we performed Pearson correlation analysis on the 6 predicted differential mRNAs and miR-146b-5p. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that miR-146b-5p had the strongest negative connection with SEMA3G (Fig. 3B, C), and the role of SEMA3G in the malignant progression of ccRCC had not been reported yet. Therefore, SEMA3G was chosen as the research subject. Next, we conducted bioinformatics analysis on SEMA3G, and data from TCGA-KIRC database (normal: 72, tumor: 539) showed that the expression level of SEMA3G in ccRCC tissues was remarkably lowerthan that  in normal tissues (Fig. 3D). Subsequently, bioinformatics R package “survival” was applied to analyze correlation between SEMA3G expression and the prognosis of ccRCC patients. K-M analysis demonstrated that patients with low SEMA3G level had a much shorter survival than those with high level (Fig. 3E). Next, the above bioinformatics analysis results were verified by cell functional experiments. qRT-PCR exhibited that the mRNA level of SEMA3G was substantially reduced in ccRCC cells (Fig. 3F), in line with the above bioinformatics analysis results. Whereafter, we predicted a binding site for miR-146b-5p with SEMA3G through bioinformatics analysis (Fig. 3G). Dual-luciferase assay further confirmed the targeted relationship between miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G. Overexpression of miR-146b-5p inhibited wild-type SEMA3G 3’-UTR luciferase activity, but did not affect mutant SEMA3G 3’-UTR luciferase activity, which indicated that miR-146b-5p could target and bind to SEMA3G 3’-UTR (Fig. 3H). Finally, qRT-PCR analyzed the regulatory relationship between miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G. Experimental findings illustrated that overexpression of miR-146b-5p could repress SEMA3 expression (Fig. 3I). Accordingly, we concluded that SEMA3G was a target of miR-146b-5p and downregulated by miR-146b-5p.

Fig. 3
figure 3

MiR-146b-5p targets the expression of SEMA3G A: Venn diagram of miR-146b-5p predicted target mRNA and down-regulated differential mRNAs. Green indicates TargetScan database, orange indicates down-regulated differential mRNAs in TCGA-KIRC dataset, yellow indicates starBase database, pink indicates mirDIP database, blue indicates miRDB database; B: Pearson correlation analysis plot of miR-146b-5p and candidate genes; C: Pearson correlation analysis plot of miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G; D: Expression of SEMA3G in TCGA-KIRC database, blue box plot indicates normal samples, yellow box plot indicates tumor samples; E: Expression level of SEMA3G on overall survival curve of patients. Red indicates high expression of SEMA3G. Blue represents low SEMA3G expression; F: SEMA3G mRNA expression level in normal cell line HK-2 and ccRCC cell lines 786–O, A498, 769-P and Caki-2; G: Schematic diagram of SEMA3G-WT and SEMA3G-MUT binding to miR-146b-5p sequence predicted by starBase; H: Dual-luciferase assay was used to detect luciferase activity in different treatment groups in ccRCC cell line Caki-2; I: qRT-PCR was performed to detect the regulatory relationship between miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G in Caki-2 cells; All the above experiments were performed with 3 biological replicates; *P < 0.05 indicates statistical difference, **P<0.01 indicates significant difference, ***P<0.001 indicates extremely significant difference.

MiR-146b-5p targets SEMA3G to modulate Notch and TGF-β signaling, thereby affecting migration, invasion and EMT of ccRCC cells

In the above studies, we have proved stimulative impacts of miR-146b-5p on ccRCC cell migration and invasion. Here, we studied effects of miR-146b-5p/SEMA3G on functions of ccRCC cells. Firstly, we conducted GSEA for SEMA3G and found that SEMA3G was mainly concentrated in the Notch and TGF-β signaling (Fig. 4A). To investigate whether miR-146b-5p/SEMA3G modulates ccRCC cell phenotypes through the Notch and TGF-β signaling, we constructed a SEMA3G overexpression cell line (miR-NC + oe-SEMA3G) and a simultaneous overexpression cell line of miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G (miR-mimic + oe-SEMA3G) using Caki-2 cell line. As evaluated by qRT-PCR and western blot, mRNA and protein expression levels of SEMA3G were elevated in miR-NC + oe-SEMA3G group. Compared to miR-NC + oe-SEMA3G group, SEMA3G mRNA and protein levels were repressed in cells after overexpressing both miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G. (Fig. 4B, C). MiR-146b-5p attenuated SEMA3G expression, and that these cells could be utilized for subsequent assays. Afterward, we performed transwell assays and wound healing experiment, and discovered that cancer cell migration and invasion were significantly reduced following SEMA3G overexpression. However, when miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G were overexpressed at the same time, migratory and invasive abilities of cancer cells were considerably increased in contrast to those with SEMA3G overexpression alone (Fig. 4D, E). Western blot measured the expression of MMP2 and MMP9. According to the results, the expression levels of MMP2 and MMP9 were significantly decreased in miR-NC + oe-SEMA3 group compared to miR-NC + oe-NC group, while those in miR-mimic + oe-SEMA3G group returned to the levels in miR-NC + oe-NC group (Fig. 4F). As for the results of cell morphology analysis, in comparison with miR-NC + oe-NC group, miR-NC + oe-SEMA3 group revealed loss of intercellular adhesion, loss of cell polarity and increased pseudopodia formation, while the cell morphology of miR-mimic + oe-SEMA3G group was similar to that of miR-NC + oe-NC group (Fig. 4G). mRNA expression levels of Notch1, Snail1, Snail2 and EMT markers E-cadherin, N-cadherin and Vimentin were evaluated by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4H) . Notch and TGF-β signaling pathway-related proteins Notch 1, Hes1, Hes5, TGFβR1, TGFβR2, Smad3, and p-Smad3 in cells of different treatment groups were then determined using western blot (Fig. 4 I). EMT process and the activities of Notch and TGF-β signaling pathways were inhibited in ccRCC cells during SEMA3G overexpression, but after simultaneous increasing miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G, EMT process and activities of the Notch and TGFβ signaling pathways in ccRCC cells were notably increased compared with those when SEMA3G was overexpressed alone. All in all, the results above demonstrated that miR-146b-5p facilitated migration, invasion, and EMT of tumor cells by down-regulating SEMA3G via the Notch and TGF-β signaling pathways.

Fig. 4
figure 4figure 4

MiR-146b-5p targets SEMA3G to regulate Notch and TGF-β signaling pathways to affect the migration, invasion and EMT of ccRCC cells. A: GSEA pathway enrichment analysis results of SEMA3G; B, C: The mRNA and protein expression of SEMA3G in different treatment groups of ccRCC cells Caki-2; D, E: Transwell assays and wound healing experiment were performed to inspect the migratory and invasive abilities of ccRCC cells Caki-2 in different treatment groups (100 ×); F: Western blot was performed to inspect the expression levels of MMP2 and MMP9 in Caki-2 cells; G: The morphology of Caki-2 cells in each transfection group was observed under microscope; H: qRT-PCR evaluated the mRNA levels of Notch1, Snail1, Snail2, E-cadherin, N-cadherin and Vimentin in Caki-2 cells; I: The expression of EMT marker proteins, Notch, and TGF-β signaling pathway marker proteins in different treatment groups of ccRCC cells Caki-2; All the above experiments were performed with 3 biological replicates; *P < 0.05 indicates statistical difference, **P<0.01 indicates significant difference, ***P<0.001 indicates extremely significant difference. One-way ANOVA analysis of variance was used for comparison of three groups. 

Discussion

MiRNAs are novel and prospective biomarkers for diagnosing and treating human malignancies. MiRNAs’ role and regulation mechanism in human cancers has been a research hotspot in recent years. MiR-146b-5p dysregulation is unveiled in many cancers. For example, miR-146b-5p controls colorectal cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and metabolism targeting PDHB [29]. Through targeting ZNRF3, miR-146b-5p facilitates thyroid cancer metastasis and triggers EMT [32]. The results of bioinformatics analysis in the current study showed that miR-146b-5p expression was considerably up-regulated in ccRCC cells, which was confirmed by cell biological assays and consistent with the study of Zhang et al [11]. Herein, cell functional experiments unraveled that miR-146b-5p enhanced ccRCC cell migration, invasion, and EMT, which also proved correlation between miR-146b-5p and EMT and agreed with previous study [32].

In this study, a bioinformatics investigation revealed SEMA3G as a new putative target gene downstream of miR-146b-5p. Dual luciferase assay was adopted to validate binding relationship between miR-146b-5p and SEMA3G. There are few reports on the role of SEMA3G as an oncogene, and SEMA3G prevents tumor cell migration and invasion in gliomas [36]. Li et al. [37] disclosed that low level of SEMA3G is a protective factor in ccRCC. According to the results of bioinformatics analysis as well as the cell experiments in the current study, SEMA3G was downregulated in ccRCC cells, which agreed with Li et al. Rescue assay has illustrated that miR-146b-5p accelerated ccRCC cell migration, invasion and EMT by inhibiting SEMA3G expression.

In addition, this study also discovered that SEMA3G was enriched in Notch and TGF-β signaling pathways, thereby regulating cellular EMT progression. Some studies have confirmed the close association of these two signaling pathways with EMT. Previous studies have found that Notch signaling can regulate SNAI1 expression directly [38, 39] or indirectly through inducing hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α). Interaction of Snail2 with Notch is crucial for Notch-mediated E-cadherin inhibition and β-catenin activation in mouse mammary epithelial to mesenchymal (NMuMG) cells [40, 41]. Notch overexpression in endothelial cells gives rise to the loss of vascular endothelial-cadherin, leading to endothelial transition (EndMT) [38]. Inhibited Notch1 decreased cell invasiveness and partially reversed EMT in lung adenocarcinoma cells [42]. We measured the expression of Notch1 and Snail1 in ccRCC cells and found that miR-146b-5p/SEMA3G axis could facilitate the expression of Notch1 and Snail1. Moreover, detection of EMT-related markers confirmed that miR-146b-5p/SEMA3G axis fostered EMT, which confirmed the correlation between Notch1, Snail1 and EMT, echoing previous studies. TGF-β signaling is of essence for maintaining immune responses and tissue homeostasis [43, 44]. It plays a role in multiple cellular functions associated with the environment, such as differentiation, growth arrest, proliferation, EMT and apoptosis [45,46,47]. Currently, most cancer and fibrotic EMT are regulated by TGFβ1 [48], while TGFβ2 primarily controls EndMT in the heart development [49], and TGFβ3 mediates EMT in development [50]. Many studies has reported the involvement of signaling pathways such as Notch [51, 52] and TGF-β [53, 54] in the biological and pathological processes of ccRCC, but there are few reports on the involvement of signaling pathways such as Notch and TGF-β regulated by miRNAs in ccRCC development. Zhang et al. [55] found that miR-154 can regulate Wnt/β-catenin and Notch activities in RCC. Aberrant activation of Notch signaling pathway is closely implicated in cell proliferation, metastasis and EMT [56]. Jingushi et al. [57] disclosed that miR-629 can promote the TGF-β/Smad signaling and accelerate ccRCC migration and invasion via TRIM33. Based on these, we looked deeply into modulatory role of miRNA-146b-5p on SEMA3G and even signaling pathways like Notch and TGF-β in ccRCC. As our study revealed, overexpression of SEMA3G reduced the activity of Notch/TGF-β signaling pathway. And it decreased migration, invasion, and EMT of ccRCC cells compared to controls, but overexpressed of miR-146b-5p reverted these effects. Therefore, we suggested that miR-146b-5p fostered migration, invasion, and EMT of ccRCC cells by inhibiting SEMA3G expression from inactivating signaling pathways such as Notch/TGF-β. These findings provided a molecular mechanism of SEMA3G on ccRCC metastasis and EMT, which supported theoretical establishment of SEMA3G as a modulator and facilitates precision treatment of ccRCC.

In conclusion, miR-146b-5p facilitated migration, invasion and EMT of ccRCC cells by downregulating SEMA3G expression and activating signaling pathways such as Notch/TGF-β. For the first time, functions of miR-146b-5p/SEMA3G axis in ccRCC migration, invasion, and EMT are shown in this work. These findings are conducive to the completion of modulatory network downstream of miR-146b-5p in ccRCC progression. We provided a new entry point to find new targeted therapeutic pathways and therapeutic ideas for ccRCC, which increased our knowledge of SEMA3G regulatory involvement in signaling networks, as well as its role in cancer development. As a matter of course, this study has some potential limitations, mainly lies in the lack of clinical examination of miR-146b-5p/SEMA3G expression, and lack of relevant functional verification from the perspective of in vivo experiments. It is believed that more progress will be made in the treatment of ccRCC with further research.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Zbar B, Klausner R, Linehan WM. Studying cancer families to identify kidney cancer genes. Annu Rev Med. 2003;54:217–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta GP, Massague J. Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell. 2006;127(4):679–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gasinska A, Jaszczynski J, Adamczyk A, Janecka-Widla A, Wilk W, Cichocka A, Stelmach A. Biomarkers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in localized, surgically treated clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2018;56(4):195–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang L, Yang G, Zhao D, Wang J, Bai Y, Peng Q, Wang H, Fang R, Chen G, Wang Z, Wang K, Li G, Yang Y, Wang Z, Guo P, Peng L, Hou D, Xu W. CD103-positive CSC exosome promotes EMT of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: role of remote MiR-19b-3p. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu Z, Huang J, Li X, Xing J, Chen Q, Liu R, Hua F, Qiu Z, Song Y, Bai C, Mo YY, Zhang Z. Gut microbiota regulate tumor metastasis via circRNA/miRNA networks. Gut Microbes. 2020;12(1):1788891.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan G, Liu Y, Shang L, Zhou F, Yang S. EMT-associated microRNAs and their roles in cancer stemness and drug resistance. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021;41(3):199–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamakuchi M, Ferlito M, Lowenstein CJ. miR-34a repression of SIRT1 regulates apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(36):13421–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi L, Su Y, Zheng Z, Qi J, Wang W, Wang C. miR-146b-5p promotes colorectal cancer progression by targeting TRAF6. Exp Ther Med. 2022;23(3):231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren Y, Wang X, Ji T, Cai X. MicroRNA-146b-5p suppresses cholangiocarcinoma cells by targeting TRAF6 and modulating p53 translocation. Acta Histochem. 2021;123(7):151793.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Z, Fu X, Gao Y, Nie Z. LINC01535 Attenuates ccRCC progression through regulation of the miR-146b-5p/TRIM2 axis and inactivation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. J Oncol. 2022;2022:2153337.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo Y, Raible D, Raper JA. Collapsin: a protein in brain that induces the collapse and paralysis of neuronal growth cones. Cell. 1993;75(2):217–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uchida Y, James JM, Suto F, Mukouyama YS. Class 3 semaphorins negatively regulate dermal lymphatic network formation. Biol Open. 2015;4(9):1194–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu W, Li J, Liu M, Zhang H, Wang N. PPAR-gamma promotes endothelial cell migration by inducing the expression of Sema3g. J Cell Biochem. 2015;116(4):514–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu X, Uemura A, Fukushima Y, Yoshida Y, Hirashima M. Semaphorin 3G provides a repulsive guidance cue to lymphatic endothelial cells via Neuropilin-2/PlexinD1. Cell Rep. 2016;17(9):2299–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wan B, Liu B, Huang Y, Yu G, Lv C. Prognostic value of immune-related genes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(23):11474–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao X, Yang J, Chen Y. Identification of a four immune-related genes signature based on an immunogenomic landscape analysis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(12):9834–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin YT, Wu KJ. Epigenetic regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition: focusing on hypoxia and TGF-beta signaling. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27(1):39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Krishna BM, Jana S, Singhal J, Horne D, Awasthi S, Salgia R, Singhal SS. Notch signaling in breast cancer: From pathway analysis to therapy. Cancer Lett. 2019;461:123–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Y, Gu Y, Tang N, Liu Y, Zhao Z. miR-22-Notch signaling pathway is involved in the regulation of the apoptosis and autophagy in human ovarian cancer cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2018;41(8):1237–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Su Q, Xin L. Notch signaling in prostate cancer: refining a therapeutic opportunity. Histol Histopathol. 2016;31(2):149–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vinson KE, George DC, Fender AW, Bertrand FE, Sigounas G. The notch pathway in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(8):1835–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ren C, Zhou Z, Wang X, Hua X, Zou M, Zhang X. SHCBP1 promotes the progression of Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via the TGFbeta pathway. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2021;29(2):136–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Y, Yang J, Zhang X, Liu H, Guo J. KDM6A suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation by negatively regulating the TGF-beta/SMAD signaling pathway. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(3):2774–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chod J, Zavadova E, Halaska MJ, Strnad P, Fucikova T, Rob L. Preoperative transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) plasma levels in operable breast cancer patients. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(6):613–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fischer JR, Darjes H, Lahm H, Schindel M, Drings P, Krammer PH. Constitutive secretion of bioactive transforming growth factor beta 1 by small cell lung cancer cell lines. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(14):2125–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jia M, Shi Y, Li Z, Lu X, Wang J. MicroRNA-146b-5p as an oncomiR promotes papillary thyroid carcinoma development by targeting CCDC6. Cancer Lett. 2019;443:145–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Y, Zhang H, Dong Y, Fan Y, Li Y, Zhao C, Wang C, Liu J, Li X, Dong M, Liu H, Chen J. MiR-146b-5p functions as a suppressor miRNA and prognosis predictor in non-small cell lung cancer. J Cancer. 2017;8(9):1704–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu Y, Wu G, Yan W, Zhan H, Sun P. miR-146b-5p regulates cell growth, invasion, and metabolism by targeting PDHB in colorectal cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7(5):1136–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu W, Fu X, Li R. CNN1 regulates the DKK1/Wnt/beta-catenin/c-myc signaling pathway by activating TIMP2 to inhibit the invasion, migration and EMT of lung squamous cell carcinoma cells. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(2):855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu S, Li L, Tian W, Nie D, Mu W, Qiu F, Liu Y, Liu X, Wang X, Du Z, Chu WF, Yang B. PEP06 polypeptide 30 exerts antitumour effect in colorectal carcinoma via inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Br J Pharmacol. 2018;175(15):3111–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Deng X, Wu B, Xiao K, Kang J, Xie J, Zhang X, Fan Y. MiR-146b-5p promotes metastasis and induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in thyroid cancer by targeting ZNRF3. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;35(1):71–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tang Y, Tang Y, Cheng YS. miR-34a inhibits pancreatic cancer progression through Snail1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the Notch signaling pathway. Sci Rep. 2017;7:38232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hu Y, Nie Q, Dai M, Chen F, Wu H. Histone deacetylases inhibit the snail2-mediated EMT during metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:752.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang G, Zhao Z, Zhang X, Wu A, Huang Y, Miao Y, Yang M. Effect of berberine on the renal tubular epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by inhibition of the Notch/snail pathway in diabetic nephropathy model KKAy mice. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:1065–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou X, Ma L, Li J, Gu J, Shi Q, Yu R. Effects of SEMA3G on migration and invasion of glioma cells. Oncol Rep. 2012;28(1):269–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang QJ, He Y, Li Y, Shen H, Lin L, Zhu M, Wang Z, Luo X, Hill JA, Cao D, Luo RL, Zou R, McAnally J, Liao J, Bajona P, Zang QS, Yu Y, Liu ZP. Matricellular Protein Cilp1 promotes myocardial fibrosis in response to myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2021;129(11):1021–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Timmerman LA, Grego-Bessa J, Raya A, Bertran E, Perez-Pomares JM, Diez J, Aranda S, Palomo S, McCormick F, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, de la Pompa JL. Notch promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition during cardiac development and oncogenic transformation. Genes Dev. 2004;18(1):99–115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Leong KG, Niessen K, Kulic I, Raouf A, Eaves C, Pollet I, Karsan A. Jagged1-mediated Notch activation induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through Slug-induced repression of E-cadherin. J Exp Med. 2007;204(12):2935–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu L, Hebert MC, Zhang YE. TGF-beta receptor-activated p38 MAP kinase mediates Smad-independent TGF-beta responses. EMBO J. 2002;21(14):3749–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yue J, Mulder KM. Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by transforming growth factor-beta. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;142:125–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Xie M, Zhang L, He CS, Xu F, Liu JL, Hu ZH, Zhao LP, Tian Y. Activation of Notch-1 enhances epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gefitinib-acquired resistant lung cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113(5):1501–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Massague J. TGF-beta signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:753–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. David CJ, Massague J. Contextual determinants of TGFbeta action in development, immunity and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(7):419–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Massague J. TGFbeta in Cancer. Cell. 2008;134(2):215–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Massague J. TGFbeta signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(10):616–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Mu Y, Gudey SK, Landstrom M. Non-Smad signaling pathways. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;347(1):11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Akhurst RJ, Derynck R. TGF-beta signaling in cancer–a double-edged sword. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11(11):S44-51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Camenisch TD, Molin DG, Person A, Runyan RB, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, McDonald JA, Klewer SE. Temporal and distinct TGFbeta ligand requirements during mouse and avian endocardial cushion morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2002;248(1):170–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nawshad A, Hay ED. TGFbeta3 signaling activates transcription of the LEF1 gene to induce epithelial mesenchymal transformation during mouse palate development. J Cell Biol. 2003;163(6):1291–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Bhagat TD, Zou Y, Huang S, Park J, Palmer MB, Hu C, Li W, Shenoy N, Giricz O, Choudhary G, Yu Y, Ko YA, Izquierdo MC, Park AS, Vallumsetla N, Laurence R, Lopez R, Suzuki M, Pullman J, Kaner J, Gartrell B, Hakimi AA, Greally JM, Patel B, Benhadji K, Pradhan K, Verma A, Susztak K. Notch pathway is activated via genetic and epigenetic alterations and is a therapeutic target in clear cell renal cancer. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(3):837–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Feng C, Xiong Z, Jiang H, Ding Q, Fang Z, Hui W. Genetic alteration in notch pathway is associated with better prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. BioFactors. 2016;42(1):41–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bostrom AK, Lindgren D, Johansson ME, Axelson H. Effects of TGF-beta signaling in clear cell renal cell carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;435(1):126–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sjolund J, Bostrom AK, Lindgren D, Manna S, Moustakas A, Ljungberg B, Johansson M, Fredlund E, Axelson H. The notch and TGF-beta signaling pathways contribute to the aggressiveness of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e23057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang R, Zhang W, Xu B, Lv C, Hou J, Zhang G. Long intergenic non-coding RNA 1939 eliminates proliferation and migration of human renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells by down-regulation of miR-154. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2020;48(1):695–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhou B, Lin W, Long Y, Yang Y, Zhang H, Wu K, Chu Q. Notch signaling pathway: architecture, disease, and therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Jingushi K, Ueda Y, Kitae K, Hase H, Egawa H, Ohshio I, Kawakami R, Kashiwagi Y, Tsukada Y, Kobayashi T, Nakata W, Fujita K, Uemura M, Nonomura N, Tsujikawa K. miR-629 targets TRIM33 to promote TGFβ/Smad signaling and metastatic phenotypes in ccRCC. Mol Cancer Res. 2015;13(3):565–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

N/A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mx T conducted the experiments, T X supplied critical reagents, Mx T and T X wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Xiong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

There is no animal and human used in the article, so it’s not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Figure S1

Correlation between transfection efficiency and transfection time. A-B: Transfection efficiency of miR-146b-5p mimic in Caki-2 cells or of miR-146b-5p inhibitor in 786-O cells at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h; All the above experiments were performed with 3 biological replicates; ** P<0.01 indicates significant difference, ***P<0.001 indicates extremely significant difference.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, M., Xiong, T. MiR-146b-5p/SEMA3G regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cell Div 18, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13008-023-00083-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13008-023-00083-w

Keywords